Ride Clean
#1476
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,182
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hey, inability to make the leap from unsophisticated and easily caught to "I did it and I'd do it again all over just the same" that has been echoed again and again is not a lapse on the part of the writer.
#1477
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
It reads as if YOU are the one saying that, not some random drug user.
#1479
Has a magic bike
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,590
Bikes: 2018 Scott Spark, 2015 Fuji Norcom Straight, 2014 BMC GF01, 2013 Trek Madone
Mentioned: 699 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4456 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
157 Posts
Hilarious to me how some guys who love crits and road races can't grasp that there's significant $ to be made by taking people's money. Money that can be used to support your thing. Or the next generation of cyclists. Or the US National Team.
Instead it makes more sense to hand-wring over what is "real" racing (with "real" racing being the type of racing the handwringer does of course) and beat your chest as to how much better your kind of real racing is over the kind where someone as they come up the ranks gets a participation trophy before they decide to try to win. Or maybe they never decide to try to win (like most crit racers).
Pushing these people with $ out of your sport is smart??
Um. Ok.
#1480
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
#1482
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
how many dudes were in the world's RR where Thor or Sagan won their stripes?
Or are you saying 3400 is too big? Boston Marathon only has like 30,000 runners and seems like a big deal in the marathon race world.
Or are you saying 3400 is too big? Boston Marathon only has like 30,000 runners and seems like a big deal in the marathon race world.
#1483
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
I'm saying that there are not 3400 bike racers in that gran fondo because it's not a bike race.
Just like there are not 30,000 racers (what do you call actual racing runners?) in the Boston Marathon, though there are probably significantly more running racers there than most other marathons since you have to run a qualifying time. Charity people skew the numbers.
Anyway, it's a participation event with a race happening at the front, a race 95+ % of the participants are not involved in. You "pay to be a pro for a day" as the website advertises.
#1484
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
It denotes a participation event rather than a legitimate bike race.
I mean, to "qualify" for the "world championship" you have to place...what, top 30 in your age group? It's kind of ridiculous.
Compare that to say, taking the top 3 from master's nationals, or winner of master's nats and top 3 nationally ranked; something that actually means something as a bike racer.
#1485
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Lol @Ygduf gets it.
Hilarious to me how some guys who love crits and road races can't grasp that there's significant $ to be made by taking people's money. Money that can be used to support your thing. Or the next generation of cyclists. Or the US National Team.
Instead it makes more sense to hand-wring over what is "real" racing (with "real" racing being the type of racing the handwringer does of course) and beat your chest as to how much better your kind of real racing is over the kind where someone as they come up the ranks gets a participation trophy before they decide to try to win. Or maybe they never decide to try to win (like most crit racers).
Pushing these people with $ out of your sport is smart??
Um. Ok.
Hilarious to me how some guys who love crits and road races can't grasp that there's significant $ to be made by taking people's money. Money that can be used to support your thing. Or the next generation of cyclists. Or the US National Team.
Instead it makes more sense to hand-wring over what is "real" racing (with "real" racing being the type of racing the handwringer does of course) and beat your chest as to how much better your kind of real racing is over the kind where someone as they come up the ranks gets a participation trophy before they decide to try to win. Or maybe they never decide to try to win (like most crit racers).
Pushing these people with $ out of your sport is smart??
Um. Ok.
Where does that last question even come from? Who's talking about pushing anyone out of anything?
#1486
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,182
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Instead it makes more sense to hand-wring over what is "real" racing (with "real" racing being the type of racing the handwringer does of course) and beat your chest as to how much better your kind of real racing is over the kind where someone as they come up the ranks gets a participation trophy before they decide to try to win. Or maybe they never decide to try to win (like most crit racers).
But this is just philosophizing about outcomes others could face. So what's the harm, right? Dig the spurs in and run someone else's pony until it drops dead. Then go back to brushing out and braiding the mane on yours like nothing happened.
#1487
Has a magic bike
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,590
Bikes: 2018 Scott Spark, 2015 Fuji Norcom Straight, 2014 BMC GF01, 2013 Trek Madone
Mentioned: 699 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4456 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
157 Posts
You want to define a fondo as "not a race".
Many others see a timed event with a winner as "indeed a race".
When you have a large event like a fondo, the contenders are going to be racing well ahead of the unwashed masses. Their race is unaffected by what the masses are doing.
USAC could accomplish a number of things by adding fondos to their roster of events, two of the most important being bringing in needed cash and increasing exposure to the sport of bike racing.
If bike racers involved in traditional bike racing believe that they are "true" racers and that the efforts of participants of a fondo are not even worthy of being described as racing, guess what? Those people may well move on to another sport. Reasonably so, IMO.
It just completely escapes me why so many traditional bike racers want to create this chasm between themselves and the people who, if things were done right, could actually be funding their sport for them.
#1488
Has a magic bike
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,590
Bikes: 2018 Scott Spark, 2015 Fuji Norcom Straight, 2014 BMC GF01, 2013 Trek Madone
Mentioned: 699 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4456 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
157 Posts
By siphoning away what small amount of credibility it is subsisting on into who's pockets? Sister, if you think that fondo cash is going into building a better tomorrow your train already left the station.
Again since it has zero direct or immediate impact that you can conceive coming back on you, SELL SELL SELL. Let's throw a couple thousand new people onto your TT courses and see how much handwringing and crying about dissolution of the purest form of racing, a race against the clock, suddenly enter your mindset. Sounds like your own personal Fiesta Island dream, right. A party with 4000 of your closest new friends all enjoying something on the same level at the same time. What could possibly bother a "real" TT racer like you about that?
But this is just philosophizing about outcomes others could face. So what's the harm, right? Dig the spurs in and run someone else's pony until it drops dead. Then go back to brushing out and braiding the mane on yours like nothing happened.
Again since it has zero direct or immediate impact that you can conceive coming back on you, SELL SELL SELL. Let's throw a couple thousand new people onto your TT courses and see how much handwringing and crying about dissolution of the purest form of racing, a race against the clock, suddenly enter your mindset. Sounds like your own personal Fiesta Island dream, right. A party with 4000 of your closest new friends all enjoying something on the same level at the same time. What could possibly bother a "real" TT racer like you about that?
But this is just philosophizing about outcomes others could face. So what's the harm, right? Dig the spurs in and run someone else's pony until it drops dead. Then go back to brushing out and braiding the mane on yours like nothing happened.
Lol, I would be 100% fine with 4000 people racing at Fiesta or any TT that I race. It would actually bring a lot of money into the sport and, if managed properly, that money could allow for a lot of positive things to happen. I in no way see bike racing as something that should be exclusive or exclusionary, and more people participating would in no way tarnish my event for me.
Do I believe that the current USAC organization would be capable of managing that money properly? No. But that's a different subject.
I'm not trying to hurt your pony, don't worry. I would never do that. I'm a veterinarian.
<Fiesta BTW is a bad example, its not USAC-sanctioned. But I get your point.>
#1491
Senior Member
Does a ride need to have usac approval to be called a race? Or does it need to have categories?
Idk, back when I was a kid we had a one acre lot and all the friends would line up at one end and run as fast as we could until the winner smashed into the chain link fence on the other end. Pretty sure that was a race. (damn Kyle would almost always win but I could run til he collapsed in any game of tag!)
Idk, back when I was a kid we had a one acre lot and all the friends would line up at one end and run as fast as we could until the winner smashed into the chain link fence on the other end. Pretty sure that was a race. (damn Kyle would almost always win but I could run til he collapsed in any game of tag!)
#1492
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,182
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nah, I took some liberties with how deeply into the conversation aspects of it could be picked up for momentary reexamination. It's like stabbing a puddle trying to accurately point out the overly dissected parts that comprise doping anymore. Just causes a ripple effect in conversation and distorted view for anyone not fully attentive at this late point.
Last edited by miyata man; 06-27-17 at 09:25 PM.
#1493
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
It brings it down a notch in my opinion.
It denotes a participation event rather than a legitimate bike race.
I mean, to "qualify" for the "world championship" you have to place...what, top 30 in your age group? It's kind of ridiculous.
Compare that to say, taking the top 3 from master's nationals, or winner of master's nats and top 3 nationally ranked; something that actually means something as a bike racer.
It denotes a participation event rather than a legitimate bike race.
I mean, to "qualify" for the "world championship" you have to place...what, top 30 in your age group? It's kind of ridiculous.
Compare that to say, taking the top 3 from master's nationals, or winner of master's nats and top 3 nationally ranked; something that actually means something as a bike racer.
#1495
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,182
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Does a ride need to have usac approval to be called a race? Or does it need to have categories?
Idk, back when I was a kid we had a one acre lot and all the friends would line up at one end and run as fast as we could until the winner smashed into the chain link fence on the other end. Pretty sure that was a race. (damn Kyle would almost always win but I could run til he collapsed in any game of tag!)
Idk, back when I was a kid we had a one acre lot and all the friends would line up at one end and run as fast as we could until the winner smashed into the chain link fence on the other end. Pretty sure that was a race. (damn Kyle would almost always win but I could run til he collapsed in any game of tag!)
Last edited by miyata man; 06-27-17 at 09:27 PM.
#1496
**** that
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 15,402
Mentioned: 151 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1099 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
30 Posts
it brings it down a notch in my opinion.
It denotes a participation event rather than a legitimate bike race.
I mean, to "qualify" for the "world championship" you have to place...what, top 30 in your age group? It's kind of ridiculous.
Compare that to say, taking the top 3 from master's nationals, or winner of master's nats and top 3 nationally ranked; something that actually means something as a bike racer.
It denotes a participation event rather than a legitimate bike race.
I mean, to "qualify" for the "world championship" you have to place...what, top 30 in your age group? It's kind of ridiculous.
Compare that to say, taking the top 3 from master's nationals, or winner of master's nats and top 3 nationally ranked; something that actually means something as a bike racer.
#1498
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
You want to define a fondo as "not a race".
Many others see a timed event with a winner as "indeed a race".
When you have a large event like a fondo, the contenders are going to be racing well ahead of the unwashed masses. Their race is unaffected by what the masses are doing.
USAC could accomplish a number of things by adding fondos to their roster of events, two of the most important being bringing in needed cash and increasing exposure to the sport of bike racing.
If bike racers involved in traditional bike racing believe that they are "true" racers and that the efforts of participants of a fondo are not even worthy of being described as racing, guess what? Those people may well move on to another sport. Reasonably so, IMO.
It just completely escapes me why so many traditional bike racers want to create this chasm between themselves and the people who, if things were done right, could actually be funding their sport for them.
Many others see a timed event with a winner as "indeed a race".
When you have a large event like a fondo, the contenders are going to be racing well ahead of the unwashed masses. Their race is unaffected by what the masses are doing.
USAC could accomplish a number of things by adding fondos to their roster of events, two of the most important being bringing in needed cash and increasing exposure to the sport of bike racing.
If bike racers involved in traditional bike racing believe that they are "true" racers and that the efforts of participants of a fondo are not even worthy of being described as racing, guess what? Those people may well move on to another sport. Reasonably so, IMO.
It just completely escapes me why so many traditional bike racers want to create this chasm between themselves and the people who, if things were done right, could actually be funding their sport for them.
There's no chasm, there are definitions. There are words and what those words actually mean. There's no need to perpetuate some delusion to make sure no one's feelings are hurt. I'm not a Nascar driver because I go to a track day. And no one in their right mind would suggest me thinking I am is actually okay.
#1499
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
I don't know where this idea is even coming from, or what it has to do with anything.
The billionaire down the road could be funding the sport as well, but I'm not going to start addressing him as Mr. Bike Racer just because he came on a group ride so that he'd actually do it.
#1500
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Does a ride need to have usac approval to be called a race? Or does it need to have categories?
Idk, back when I was a kid we had a one acre lot and all the friends would line up at one end and run as fast as we could until the winner smashed into the chain link fence on the other end. Pretty sure that was a race. (damn Kyle would almost always win but I could run til he collapsed in any game of tag!)
Idk, back when I was a kid we had a one acre lot and all the friends would line up at one end and run as fast as we could until the winner smashed into the chain link fence on the other end. Pretty sure that was a race. (damn Kyle would almost always win but I could run til he collapsed in any game of tag!)