Custom Gearing for Cat 5 Sprinter - 52/34 12-28
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,109
Bikes: s-1
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 221 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Custom Gearing for Cat 5 Sprinter - 52/34 12-28
I've searched and read a lot - maybe this post is just to tell you what I'm going to attempt and to log my results for the rest of the web.
What I had: FSA Omega 50/34, BB4000 English - 105 5800 FD/SS RD 105 11-28
Advertised Specs: 16T max drop, 28t max advertised, 33 total tooth max capacity
What I'm running: DA9000 52/36, BB9000 English - 105 5800 FD/SS RD 105 (12-28) (built from 5800 11/-28/12-25)
What I'm going to run: DA9000 52/34, BB9000 English, 105 5800 FD/SS RD 105 12-28 [running 18T drop on 105 5800 FD Mechanical on 105 12-28 cassette, being careful not to crosschain]
Actual Specs: 18T max drop, 28t max advertised, 34 total max capacity
I don't think the 34 tooth total will be an issue at all, especially because I don't cross chain, and never beyond 2 cogs., and I'm sure Shimano designs a cog or two of error into their posted specs. I will have a compact low gear (34/28) and a nearly standard high (52/12), with a crazy range, with over 40mph+ of top end for leadouts and downhills and a modest low gear for climbing. Given this setup, a front change would be accompanied by 4 gears on the cassette, which is more than 1 throw, but doable. I've ready in detail that the new 2015+ 105+ can easily take 18T up front. Carefully conducted, this setup could probably also utilize a 12-32 .
I'm not only certain this can be done, I'm wondering why Shimano doesn't come out with something incredible and drastic, like the 46/30 13-32, which in my opinion, would absolutely crush the commuter and touring market. It could go anywhere and almost NEVER exceed the drivetrain in any situation.
What I had: FSA Omega 50/34, BB4000 English - 105 5800 FD/SS RD 105 11-28
Advertised Specs: 16T max drop, 28t max advertised, 33 total tooth max capacity
What I'm running: DA9000 52/36, BB9000 English - 105 5800 FD/SS RD 105 (12-28) (built from 5800 11/-28/12-25)
What I'm going to run: DA9000 52/34, BB9000 English, 105 5800 FD/SS RD 105 12-28 [running 18T drop on 105 5800 FD Mechanical on 105 12-28 cassette, being careful not to crosschain]
Actual Specs: 18T max drop, 28t max advertised, 34 total max capacity
I don't think the 34 tooth total will be an issue at all, especially because I don't cross chain, and never beyond 2 cogs., and I'm sure Shimano designs a cog or two of error into their posted specs. I will have a compact low gear (34/28) and a nearly standard high (52/12), with a crazy range, with over 40mph+ of top end for leadouts and downhills and a modest low gear for climbing. Given this setup, a front change would be accompanied by 4 gears on the cassette, which is more than 1 throw, but doable. I've ready in detail that the new 2015+ 105+ can easily take 18T up front. Carefully conducted, this setup could probably also utilize a 12-32 .
I'm not only certain this can be done, I'm wondering why Shimano doesn't come out with something incredible and drastic, like the 46/30 13-32, which in my opinion, would absolutely crush the commuter and touring market. It could go anywhere and almost NEVER exceed the drivetrain in any situation.
Last edited by ypsetihw; 10-10-16 at 06:22 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
There are not sprinter setups that take a 32. 28 is about the max.
Sprinters are in the big ring.
Smaller front = more chain tension. Rarely discussed and a real thing.
I do know a few folks in Shimano and have never heard about crushing the commuter and touring market - but I really would not know.
Sprinters are in the big ring.
Smaller front = more chain tension. Rarely discussed and a real thing.
I do know a few folks in Shimano and have never heard about crushing the commuter and touring market - but I really would not know.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,109
Bikes: s-1
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 221 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
this gives me a 12/52 to sprint, at 120 cadence it's over 40mph and even with a good lead out I've only ever hit 37mph on flats. I'm a cat 5 with only 2 starts under my belt, keep that in mind.
I'm also 195 lbs and next season, if I can get down to the mid 180s, I'll still need a 34/28 for anything hilly. The overlap on the 34 and 36 is comparable, and I don't know why I wouldn't go for it.
Just to clarify, the DA9000 34T inner ring is only $22, and I already have the 52/36 crankset. IMHO, it's worth the cost of the experiment, and might actually be surprisingly good.
I'm also 195 lbs and next season, if I can get down to the mid 180s, I'll still need a 34/28 for anything hilly. The overlap on the 34 and 36 is comparable, and I don't know why I wouldn't go for it.
Just to clarify, the DA9000 34T inner ring is only $22, and I already have the 52/36 crankset. IMHO, it's worth the cost of the experiment, and might actually be surprisingly good.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,109
Bikes: s-1
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 221 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There are not sprinter setups that take a 32. 28 is about the max.
Sprinters are in the big ring.
Smaller front = more chain tension. Rarely discussed and a real thing.
I do know a few folks in Shimano and have never heard about crushing the commuter and touring market - but I really would not know.
Sprinters are in the big ring.
Smaller front = more chain tension. Rarely discussed and a real thing.
I do know a few folks in Shimano and have never heard about crushing the commuter and touring market - but I really would not know.
2) "Smaller front = more chain" tension is also ridiculous, as I will not ever crosschain the 52/28 and certainly ever the 52/32 if that happens, and the short cage RD will happily suck up the slack on a 34 12-28 setup with a 52T big ring: the spec is 33 total and the actual would be 34, hardly outrageous and irrelevant if you don't cross chain the small ring.
3) I don't know anyone who can spin an 11t, and I only know a couple who could use a 12t, regardless of chainring. For the commuter and tourer market, the 46/13 would be plenty high at almost 3:1, and 30T/32t at less than 1:1 is more than most casual commuter/fitness/touring riders need ever in any situation, with acceptable gaps between the gears.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
1) There most certainly are "sprinter setups" that get a 32, especially when they have dozens or hundreds of miles in the hills to get to that bunch finish. This is an asinine statement and not worth more elaboration.
2) "Smaller front = more chain" tension is also ridiculous, as I will not ever crosschain the 52/28 and certainly ever the 52/32 if that happens, and the short cage RD will happily suck up the slack on a 34 12-28 setup with a 52T big ring: the spec is 33 total and the actual would be 34, hardly outrageous and irrelevant if you don't cross chain the small ring.
3) I don't know anyone who can spin an 11t, and I only know a couple who could use a 12t, regardless of chainring. For the commuter and tourer market, the 46/13 would be plenty high at almost 3:1, and 30T/32t at less than 1:1 is more than most casual commuter/fitness/touring riders need ever in any situation, with acceptable gaps between the gears.
2) "Smaller front = more chain" tension is also ridiculous, as I will not ever crosschain the 52/28 and certainly ever the 52/32 if that happens, and the short cage RD will happily suck up the slack on a 34 12-28 setup with a 52T big ring: the spec is 33 total and the actual would be 34, hardly outrageous and irrelevant if you don't cross chain the small ring.
3) I don't know anyone who can spin an 11t, and I only know a couple who could use a 12t, regardless of chainring. For the commuter and tourer market, the 46/13 would be plenty high at almost 3:1, and 30T/32t at less than 1:1 is more than most casual commuter/fitness/touring riders need ever in any situation, with acceptable gaps between the gears.
#2 - OK.
#3 - OK - I do.
#9
out walking the earth
some of this interests me, trolling aside.
what's the largest cog I can make work on 6700? does a med cage rear derailleur get me to 32 or larger? Once I get there what's the smallest cassette I can also run without swapping chains?
on my climbing bike I'd love to run a 34x25 most of the time but 34x32 (or bigger) on my race wheels for certain races.
Do I need a mountain bike derailleur?
what's the largest cog I can make work on 6700? does a med cage rear derailleur get me to 32 or larger? Once I get there what's the smallest cassette I can also run without swapping chains?
on my climbing bike I'd love to run a 34x25 most of the time but 34x32 (or bigger) on my race wheels for certain races.
Do I need a mountain bike derailleur?
#10
Senior Member
#11
Rides too much bike
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Boston
Posts: 842
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
@gsteinb I can probably answer a few of these questions. I have played around a lot with different climbing set-ups.
Your max gear in back is partially controlled be the derailleur and partially controlled by the frame / hanger. All you really need to be able to use a large gear (Like a 32) is for the derailleur pulley to be positioned low enough to clear the cog. One thing you can do is use something like this: RoadLink ? wolftoothcomponents.com which gives you more clearance. Sometimes you can also find a derailleur hanger that fits your bike and has a little more length.
Your chain wrap is the amount of chain that the rear derailleur is capable of keeping in check. That is the 33T capacity (Or 37T capacity on a long cage Shimano). Having too short a cage just means that you can get dangling chain if you shift small-small and and your tooth differences are larger than the capacity.
As for @gsteinb 's climbing bike: I have seen a number of people try to mix a mountain derailleur with a road shifter and it almost never works properly. You will inevitably see problems in the shifting, normally at the higher ranges of tension / lower gears so I don't think it is a good idea for a climbing bike. If you really want to run a 32 I suggest starting off with a long cage road derailleur and trying things out. If that doesn't work, grab a road-link and most likely things will be fine.
Your max gear in back is partially controlled be the derailleur and partially controlled by the frame / hanger. All you really need to be able to use a large gear (Like a 32) is for the derailleur pulley to be positioned low enough to clear the cog. One thing you can do is use something like this: RoadLink ? wolftoothcomponents.com which gives you more clearance. Sometimes you can also find a derailleur hanger that fits your bike and has a little more length.
Your chain wrap is the amount of chain that the rear derailleur is capable of keeping in check. That is the 33T capacity (Or 37T capacity on a long cage Shimano). Having too short a cage just means that you can get dangling chain if you shift small-small and and your tooth differences are larger than the capacity.
As for @gsteinb 's climbing bike: I have seen a number of people try to mix a mountain derailleur with a road shifter and it almost never works properly. You will inevitably see problems in the shifting, normally at the higher ranges of tension / lower gears so I don't think it is a good idea for a climbing bike. If you really want to run a 32 I suggest starting off with a long cage road derailleur and trying things out. If that doesn't work, grab a road-link and most likely things will be fine.
#12
Senior Member
I have seen a number of people try to mix a mountain derailleur with a road shifter and it almost never works properly. You will inevitably see problems in the shifting, normally at the higher ranges of tension / lower gears so I don't think it is a good idea for a climbing bike. If you really want to run a 32 I suggest starting off with a long cage road derailleur and trying things out. If that doesn't work, grab a road-link and most likely things will be fine.
Campy for sure, at least when they made mtb stuff. Plus their front shifters are basically ratcheting shifters so they work with any front derailleur.
Shimano no idea.
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
#13
Senior Member
dz nuzz is correct.. for example on my Parlee I can run a 30T max.. my wife madone will run a 32T and it's just because how the RD sits under to clear the cog. A medium derailleur is probably a good idea, but my short cage DA9070 can handle a 32T when called upon. (normally run an 11/28 cassette)
#14
Rides too much bike
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Boston
Posts: 842
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You are right that in theory they do work (Both use what they call Exact Actuation, which is really just a fancy term for 1:1 movement of cable:derailleur movement) but I have a teammate that did Mt. Washington with a SRAM road / mountain mix and he has said that the shifting just isn't that great. Better than Shimano from what I have seen, but still non-ideal (Admittedly he was using an X-7 derailleur so it is possible that a better derailleur would have fixed things.)
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,567
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 675 Times
in
427 Posts
Since I do not run a compact crankset, when I go to the mountains, I put a Sram WiFli RD on the bike with a 11-32 cassette. That gives me a 39-32 at the low end, which is basically the same as a 34-27. I think Shimano can handle up to 30 or 32 on its regular RDs. If not, you can get a long cage RD to be able to handle the bigger cassette.
If I wanted to go with something like a 40 in the back, I could use the WolfTooth think that Dr. Nuzz referenced with the WiFli RD.
All that said, the shifting on the long cage RD isn't great, and the cassette jumps are huge.
If I wanted to go with something like a 40 in the back, I could use the WolfTooth think that Dr. Nuzz referenced with the WiFli RD.
All that said, the shifting on the long cage RD isn't great, and the cassette jumps are huge.
#16
out walking the earth
@gsteinb I can probably answer a few of these questions. I have played around a lot with different climbing set-ups.
Your max gear in back is partially controlled be the derailleur and partially controlled by the frame / hanger. All you really need to be able to use a large gear (Like a 32) is for the derailleur pulley to be positioned low enough to clear the cog. One thing you can do is use something like this: RoadLink ? wolftoothcomponents.com which gives you more clearance. Sometimes you can also find a derailleur hanger that fits your bike and has a little more length.
Your chain wrap is the amount of chain that the rear derailleur is capable of keeping in check. That is the 33T capacity (Or 37T capacity on a long cage Shimano). Having too short a cage just means that you can get dangling chain if you shift small-small and and your tooth differences are larger than the capacity.
As for @gsteinb 's climbing bike: I have seen a number of people try to mix a mountain derailleur with a road shifter and it almost never works properly. You will inevitably see problems in the shifting, normally at the higher ranges of tension / lower gears so I don't think it is a good idea for a climbing bike. If you really want to run a 32 I suggest starting off with a long cage road derailleur and trying things out. If that doesn't work, grab a road-link and most likely things will be fine.
Your max gear in back is partially controlled be the derailleur and partially controlled by the frame / hanger. All you really need to be able to use a large gear (Like a 32) is for the derailleur pulley to be positioned low enough to clear the cog. One thing you can do is use something like this: RoadLink ? wolftoothcomponents.com which gives you more clearance. Sometimes you can also find a derailleur hanger that fits your bike and has a little more length.
Your chain wrap is the amount of chain that the rear derailleur is capable of keeping in check. That is the 33T capacity (Or 37T capacity on a long cage Shimano). Having too short a cage just means that you can get dangling chain if you shift small-small and and your tooth differences are larger than the capacity.
As for @gsteinb 's climbing bike: I have seen a number of people try to mix a mountain derailleur with a road shifter and it almost never works properly. You will inevitably see problems in the shifting, normally at the higher ranges of tension / lower gears so I don't think it is a good idea for a climbing bike. If you really want to run a 32 I suggest starting off with a long cage road derailleur and trying things out. If that doesn't work, grab a road-link and most likely things will be fine.
thanks, very helpful
Not want so much as need for mount washington and a few other HCs I plan on doing next season. A bunch of people I talked to at App Gap run mountain bike derailleurs (shimano). The guy who beat me there placed really high at mount washington and runs a 36 tooth cog. That seems like overkill to me (34x36), but I guess if he's comfortable spinning an ultra high cadence...I do think that a 34x28 will get kinda grindy in some of those races though.
#17
Senior Member
You are right that in theory they do work (Both use what they call Exact Actuation, which is really just a fancy term for 1:1 movement of cable:derailleur movement) but I have a teammate that did Mt. Washington with a SRAM road / mountain mix and he has said that the shifting just isn't that great. Better than Shimano from what I have seen, but still non-ideal (Admittedly he was using an X-7 derailleur so it is possible that a better derailleur would have fixed things.)
Campy's mtb and road stuff mixed well, because the derailleurs were basically the same, just long cage or not. Back in those days (8s Campy) I built up a bike for a customer, a Pederson, and used a combination of road and mtb stuff. His road stuff ended up, with his permission, on my bike.
One thing that affects compatibility is the hub. I have all HED wheels, 10s Campy, but my race wheel requires about a half turn on the barrel adjuster to shift well. Then I put the clincher back on and it's half a turn back. I can probably fix it but it's become a ritual for me, start the race, fiddle with the barrel adjuster, shift back and forth a few times, and then I'm good to go. I don't do it in warm up because no warm up usually, plus at low speeds it works fine.
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
On the 10s. I have seen a few 11s cassettes that will fit on a 10s freewheel. RECON appears to. I (junior) have the RECON and we have to space it out when putting on a 11s FW and I had not had the need to put it on a 10s, but teammates have and I recall it worked.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,553
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4199 Post(s)
Liked 2,913 Times
in
1,781 Posts
I've searched and read a lot - maybe this post is just to tell you what I'm going to attempt and to log my results for the rest of the web.
What I had: FSA Omega 50/34, BB4000 English - 105 5800 FD/SS RD 105 11-28
Advertised Specs: 16T max drop, 28t max advertised, 33 total tooth max capacity
What I'm running: DA9000 52/36, BB9000 English - 105 5800 FD/SS RD 105 (12-28) (built from 5800 11/-28/12-25)
What I'm going to run: DA9000 52/34, BB9000 English, 105 5800 FD/SS RD 105 12-28 [running 18T drop on 105 5800 FD Mechanical on 105 12-28 cassette, being careful not to crosschain]
Actual Specs: 18T max drop, 28t max advertised, 34 total max capacity
I don't think the 34 tooth total will be an issue at all, especially because I don't cross chain, and never beyond 2 cogs., and I'm sure Shimano designs a cog or two of error into their posted specs. I will have a compact low gear (34/28) and a nearly standard high (52/12), with a crazy range, with over 40mph+ of top end for leadouts and downhills and a modest low gear for climbing. Given this setup, a front change would be accompanied by 4 gears on the cassette, which is more than 1 throw, but doable. I've ready in detail that the new 2015+ 105+ can easily take 18T up front. Carefully conducted, this setup could probably also utilize a 12-32 .
I'm not only certain this can be done, I'm wondering why Shimano doesn't come out with something incredible and drastic, like the 46/30 13-32, which in my opinion, would absolutely crush the commuter and touring market. It could go anywhere and almost NEVER exceed the drivetrain in any situation.
What I had: FSA Omega 50/34, BB4000 English - 105 5800 FD/SS RD 105 11-28
Advertised Specs: 16T max drop, 28t max advertised, 33 total tooth max capacity
What I'm running: DA9000 52/36, BB9000 English - 105 5800 FD/SS RD 105 (12-28) (built from 5800 11/-28/12-25)
What I'm going to run: DA9000 52/34, BB9000 English, 105 5800 FD/SS RD 105 12-28 [running 18T drop on 105 5800 FD Mechanical on 105 12-28 cassette, being careful not to crosschain]
Actual Specs: 18T max drop, 28t max advertised, 34 total max capacity
I don't think the 34 tooth total will be an issue at all, especially because I don't cross chain, and never beyond 2 cogs., and I'm sure Shimano designs a cog or two of error into their posted specs. I will have a compact low gear (34/28) and a nearly standard high (52/12), with a crazy range, with over 40mph+ of top end for leadouts and downhills and a modest low gear for climbing. Given this setup, a front change would be accompanied by 4 gears on the cassette, which is more than 1 throw, but doable. I've ready in detail that the new 2015+ 105+ can easily take 18T up front. Carefully conducted, this setup could probably also utilize a 12-32 .
I'm not only certain this can be done, I'm wondering why Shimano doesn't come out with something incredible and drastic, like the 46/30 13-32, which in my opinion, would absolutely crush the commuter and touring market. It could go anywhere and almost NEVER exceed the drivetrain in any situation.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,553
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4199 Post(s)
Liked 2,913 Times
in
1,781 Posts
You are right that in theory they do work (Both use what they call Exact Actuation, which is really just a fancy term for 1:1 movement of cable:derailleur movement) but I have a teammate that did Mt. Washington with a SRAM road / mountain mix and he has said that the shifting just isn't that great. Better than Shimano from what I have seen, but still non-ideal (Admittedly he was using an X-7 derailleur so it is possible that a better derailleur would have fixed things.)
#21
commu*ist spy
I would get a compact crankset and 11-28 cassette (50/11 is higher ratio than 52/12). or you could stay with your current crankset, and get a gs rear derailleur and a 11/12-32 cassette. your front derailleur is optimized such that it shifts optimally for certain sized chainring combinations, eg. 50/34 or 52/36. I've never seen a 52/34, but I would rather not risk it and potentially suffer from worse front derailleur performance. meanwhile, the other setups are proven and will work very well.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18320 Post(s)
Liked 4,489 Times
in
3,338 Posts
I'm not only certain this can be done, I'm wondering why Shimano doesn't come out with something incredible and drastic, like the 46/30 13-32, which in my opinion, would absolutely crush the commuter and touring market. It could go anywhere and almost NEVER exceed the drivetrain in any situation.
One thing that you've skipped is the 11T.
Say a 11:28 gives a 1:2.5 ratio.
13:32 gives a little less, about the same as a 11:27.
So, by having a 2 tooth smaller sprocket on the low end, one gets a 5 tooth smaller sprocket on the high end, and can make much tighter gearing throughout the sprocket.
In your case, I don't see a huge benefit for going from the 50/34, 11-28 to the 52/34, 12/28.
Perhaps we'll see smaller chainrings to gain tighter gearing.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,109
Bikes: s-1
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 221 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would get a compact crankset and 11-28 cassette (50/11 is higher ratio than 52/12). or you could stay with your current crankset, and get a gs rear derailleur and a 11/12-32 cassette. your front derailleur is optimized such that it shifts optimally for certain sized chainring combinations, eg. 50/34 or 52/36. I've never seen a 52/34, but I would rather not risk it and potentially suffer from worse front derailleur performance. meanwhile, the other setups are proven and will work very well.
Front shifts are poor compared to the rear anyway in any case with any derailleur, and with that said, the 18T jump is well within the capacity of the FD cage and is going to be fine. Specs are public info for the misinformed so the company doesn't EVER have to deal with blowback, but the capabilities of the front mech are well beyond this and there are tons of people running 18T jumps on DA9000 crankset up front, and even some who have reported 20T with no issues (54/34 chainrings).
When I say I can't spin an 11t, I mean that I can't SPIN it, and spinning while sprinting, to me, means upwards of 140-160rpm or more, which approaches or exceeds 45 mph on a 12t. I have personally registered a max cadence of 188. If you have a sprint, flat out, even with a lead out, at any RPM, that exceeds 45mph, I'd like to see it. You should be racing in the pro cat on the national tour. The 12 is PLENTY for 99.99% of bike riders, and too much for 80% or more riders, especially if you are actually SPINNING (120+ rpm minimum).
My goal is simply to absolutely maximize the range of the gearing, and to show some of you naysayers what is actually possible outside of the "advertised specs" produced by manufacturers. 34 teeth total is easily achievable with a 52/34 12-28 on a 105 SS RD, and gives you HUGE range and massive top end with a reasonably low climbing gear. My speculation on the 32 is that it would be possible, certainly with a GS RD, and would give the recreational rider gearing that couldn't be exceeded under MOST circumstances.
In summary, I agree with DurianRider that almost ALL road bikes have gearing that is MUCH too hard for ALMOST ALL recreational riders, and the trend towards 11t small cogs is simply a holdover from hardman racing in the past. Informed, world class racers are running 32 or even 36 cassettes in the TDF, and even some sprinters at the world class level are sticking with a 12 to allow them lower gears and better spacing in the mid range for getting over the mountains. We are stuck on stupid and we should be demanding more from the manufacturers.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,109
Bikes: s-1
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 221 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts