Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Dirt-riding heretic DrPete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Gig Harbor, WA
    My Bikes
    Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9
    Posts
    17,416
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Anyone racing a compact crank?

    So, I need to make a dirty confession--My Flyte came with a triple crankset. It's nice because in the rare case that I'm on a hilly ride on a recovery day I can say hi to Granny and keep a low HR up a stupid-steep hill, but having the triple crank seems to lead to sloppier shifting with the FD, more extreme chain angles when I'm racing in the big ring, and more chain-dropping. I've never really cared about the image thing, so whatever.

    I'm shopping around and have been looking at compact cranks. I feel like the 50/34 with SRAM's new 11-26 cassette would be a pretty sweet combination, with enough of a high end for sprinting and plenty of room at the low end to climb at a higher cadence on climbs without futzing with the triple.

    Most of my races are crits, with the occasional RR. I'm NOT a strong climber just yet, so that's what makes the compact appealing.

    Any compact racers out there? How's it working for you?
    "Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    331
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yea, i use a compact to race. 50/34 with a 11-23, somtimes a 11-21. works well, no complaints. there has only been 1 situations where i wish i had a 53-11. it was on very hilly road race and i was trying to bridge to the break on the decents.

    there are alot of opinions on compacts, but i say go for it.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Southwest VA
    My Bikes
    Cannondale Adventure 600, Lemond Croix de Fer
    Posts
    170
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I race a compact. I've never been limited by the lack of fast gears in a sprint, and it has only helped me on the climbs.

    Granted maybe women's races are a little slower, but I've also placed top 10 in a men's race with my compact.

  4. #4
    Geosynchronous Falconeer recursive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    My Bikes
    2006 Raleigh Rush Hour, Campy Habanero Team Ti, Soma Double Cross
    Posts
    6,312
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I race with a 50-34 and 11-23. Top end is not a problem. 50x11 is higher than 53x12. I have yet to run out of gears in a sprint.

    And I'd much rather have the option of spinning up the hills in 34x23. If you have a 26, you'll have crazy low end.
    Bring the pain.

  5. #5
    Wher'd u Get That Jacket? flythebike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Somewhere in the Tubes
    My Bikes
    Calfee Dragonfly, Lemond Poprad, Airborne Manhatten Project, Calfee Luna Fixie
    Posts
    1,317
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I raced on one for awhile. I have mixed feelings. I tended to drop my chain a lot shifting from the big to small rings. I guess they have the compact specific FDs now, so that could be overcome. I liked the broader range of gears for crits. The the fours they would slow down a lot so you would be overgeared in the big ring sometimes but undergeared in the small ring. You will turn more revoultions so your gears will wear out quicker.

    I ended up switching back to a regular crank and that works for me. I have that compact on my cross bike with a 36/46 12-27 and that is just fine for that application. I got a third eye chain watcher and don't drop my chain either.

    Probably the biggest argument agaisnt them for racing is that if you are down in the smaller cogs on the big ring, you lost efficiency. In the Bicycling Science book they found that bigger cogs result in greater efficency, probably because of the higher contact area. So a 53 will keep you in a bigger back cog and thus slightly higher efficiency. But this is a really small difference.

    It sounds like for you it would be a useful change.
    WeBlog: http://flythebike.blogspot.com
    "Then know, that I have little wealth to lose. A man I am, crossed with adversity; My riches are these poor habiliments, Of which if you should here disfurnish me, You take the sum and substance that I have." Shakespeare: The Two Gentlemen of Verona
    Calfee Dragonfly Record, Calfee Luna Fixie T/A, Level, Campy Cervelo P3SL Campy, Lemond Poprad Campy, Fisher X-Calibur

  6. #6
    Geosynchronous Falconeer recursive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    My Bikes
    2006 Raleigh Rush Hour, Campy Habanero Team Ti, Soma Double Cross
    Posts
    6,312
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by flythebike
    I raced on one for awhile. I have mixed feelings. I tended to drop my chain a lot shifting from the big to small rings. I guess they have the compact specific FDs now, so that could be overcome.
    For another data point, I have dropped the chain once in about 700 miles since I started riding compact. That one time, I was going up a hill, and still managed to re-engage the chain without stopping.

    Also, I'm using a normal FD. Actually, this is about the same rate I used to drop chains on my triple.
    Bring the pain.

  7. #7
    Racing iS my Training Pizza Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    San Francisco
    My Bikes
    07 Bianchi San Jose, 08 Tarmac SL2, 05 Cervelo P3
    Posts
    1,263
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've been racing with the stock FSA 50-34 that came with my Felt F2C all season from Cat 5 up to Cat 2 (so far ). I've been using a 11-23 on the rear in all races and have a 12-25 on my training wheels.
    I've never had shifting problems in a race, and have had pretty good results this season.
    5 wins, 6 2nds, 3 3rds, 3 4ths, 1 5th, 2 6ths.
    I don't think I'll ever go to a 53-39, but I may switch to a 50-36.

    edit: I wanted to add that I do go through a lot of chains (about every 1,000 miles). I think that climbing in the 34 puts a lot more stress on a chain than a 39.
    Last edited by Pizza Man; 08-18-06 at 10:24 AM.

  8. #8
    Banned. El Diablo Rojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    ATX, Ex So Cal
    My Bikes
    Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu
    Posts
    11,058
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I run a 50/36-23/11 for most races and 50/34-26/12 for one stage of the Ft Davis stage race (it has a 1/2 mile section of 17-20%). Most races in the Austin area have some pretty good rolling sections and short but steep climbs. I get better spacing with with the 23/11 rather than the 25/12 I'd be running with a 53/39 chainring set. Also I get a little better gearing on the top and bottom.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    2,957
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by flythebike
    Probably the biggest argument agaisnt them for racing is that if you are down in the smaller cogs on the big ring, you lost efficiency. In the Bicycling Science book they found that bigger cogs result in greater efficency, probably because of the higher contact area.
    It would be nice if you put some numbers to this. Total power loss through the drivetrain is on the order of 1-3% and a lot of that comes through sideways deflection of the chain and drag in the derailleur jockey wheels (beside the bushing drag, the chain is going around two 9 or 10 tooth cogs right there). So of what's left for drivetrain losses, how much change can there be in going to the smaller chainring and cogs?

  10. #10
    Now Racer Ex Vinokurtov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,709
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've gone back to a standard crankset on all my race bikes. I'm running 53/39 or 53/38 with a variety of cassettes up to a 12/29.

    I had a compact on my road racer/climbing bike and on my training bike, probably dropped the chain 5 times in a couple of years, using both standard and compact front derallieurs.

    Funny thing is (in the "That's funny, my front door wasn't kicked in and I had a TV before I left home this morning way, not the ha ha way) 3 of the 5 times were in races at crucial times and cost me 3 top 5 results.

    Still have one on my trainer, but I just am done racing with them.

  11. #11
    Wher'd u Get That Jacket? flythebike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Somewhere in the Tubes
    My Bikes
    Calfee Dragonfly, Lemond Poprad, Airborne Manhatten Project, Calfee Luna Fixie
    Posts
    1,317
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by asgelle
    It would be nice if you put some numbers to this. Total power loss through the drivetrain is on the order of 1-3% and a lot of that comes through sideways deflection of the chain and drag in the derailleur jockey wheels (beside the bushing drag, the chain is going around two 9 or 10 tooth cogs right there). So of what's left for drivetrain losses, how much change can there be in going to the smaller chainring and cogs?
    Actually according to the tests published in that book (which I don't have because it was a loan) deflection accounted for minimal loss of efficiency. So while crossover has some other problems, efficiency evidently isn't one of them. The difference between efficiency in an 11 versus a 21 was considerable though, on the order of a few percent of possible power.
    WeBlog: http://flythebike.blogspot.com
    "Then know, that I have little wealth to lose. A man I am, crossed with adversity; My riches are these poor habiliments, Of which if you should here disfurnish me, You take the sum and substance that I have." Shakespeare: The Two Gentlemen of Verona
    Calfee Dragonfly Record, Calfee Luna Fixie T/A, Level, Campy Cervelo P3SL Campy, Lemond Poprad Campy, Fisher X-Calibur

  12. #12
    Banned. El Diablo Rojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    ATX, Ex So Cal
    My Bikes
    Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu
    Posts
    11,058
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've droped my chain about the same amount as I did on my standard set up, maybe once or twice. FWIW I'm using a standard Record FD.

  13. #13
    It is fantastic. voltman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    The OC
    My Bikes
    05 Specialized Allez Elite; 06 Fuji Team Pro
    Posts
    7,978
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by El Diablo Rojo
    I run a 50/36-23/11 for most races and 50/34-26/12 for one stage of the Ft Davis stage race (it has a 1/2 mile section of 17-20%). Most races in the Austin area have some pretty good rolling sections and short but steep climbs. I get better spacing with with the 23/11 rather than the 25/12 I'd be running with a 53/39 chainring set. Also I get a little better gearing on the top and bottom.
    Is your choice of running the 36 versus the 34 normally just a gearing choice or for shifting performance?

  14. #14
    Veni, Vidi, Vomiti SteveE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Republic of Anaerobia
    My Bikes
    Serotta Legend Ti, Romani Columbus SL, Soma Doublecross
    Posts
    3,582
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've been running a compact setup since February - 50/34-11/23 after running a triple prior to that time. I've yet to drop the chain using a Record CT crankset set with Chorus derailleurs and brifters. I've only done one crit. Pretty much road races for me. When I was running the triple, prior to a race, I would set the lower limit screw on the front derailleur to prevent accidental shifting to the inner chainring. Most race parcours don't have insanely steep hills, so not having my lowest gears wasn't a problem.
    "Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting ...'holy *****...what a ride!'"

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    517
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Pretty ruff year eh pizza man...nice.I think he makes the case.

  16. #16
    semifreddo amartuerer 'nother's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northern CA
    My Bikes
    several
    Posts
    4,599
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a buddy who's been racing with a 50/36 & 12-27 cassette...he had no trouble getting out of the 5s straight away. He's been a 4 for a while but it's not the compact that's holding him back PizzaMan's story is a pretty good counter to the Real Men Who Only Race With Big Chainrings. I say go for it, Doc.
    Can you pass the test?
    Yield to Life.

  17. #17
    Dirt-riding heretic DrPete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Gig Harbor, WA
    My Bikes
    Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9
    Posts
    17,416
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Anyone know anything about what appears to be the new FSA Energy? I think they're selling at JensonUSA for $229 but there's no pic so I can't tell. These look SWEET. And 170g lighter than the SLK triple according to FSA's page... same weight as the K-Force compact!

    http://www.fullspeedahead.com/fly.as...xid=21&pid=770
    "Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."

  18. #18
    Gios my baby hiromian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    My Bikes
    Gios 96, Mercier 72, Peugeot 74 X 2, Sears full suspension High rise banana seat, Kona 94, CCM Rambler 70s.
    Posts
    1,135
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Pizza Man
    I've been racing with the stock FSA 50-34 that came with my Felt F2C all season from Cat 5 up to Cat 2 (so far ). I've been using a 11-23 on the rear in all races and have a 12-25 on my training wheels.
    I've never had shifting problems in a race, and have had pretty good results this season.
    5 wins, 6 2nds, 3 3rds, 3 4ths, 1 5th, 2 6ths.
    I don't think I'll ever go to a 53-39, but I may switch to a 50-36.

    edit: I wanted to add that I do go through a lot of chains (about every 1,000 miles). I think that climbing in the 34 puts a lot more stress on a chain than a 39.
    You the man Pizza! Wow and WTF. Great first year. Please tell me you are young like 25 and have raced MTB your whole life and delivered Pizza too boot. Sh1t thats just awsome.
    "Aiyah...Oh no"

  19. #19
    Banned. El Diablo Rojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    ATX, Ex So Cal
    My Bikes
    Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu
    Posts
    11,058
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by voltman
    Is your choice of running the 36 versus the 34 normally just a gearing choice or for shifting performance?
    Gearing choice. I don't run into any shifting problems with either chainring (34 or 36). For the type of terrain we have here in Austin I find the 50/36 11/23 set up to work the best for me. FWIW I made the decision to go to a compact after doing a test with my coach and we determined that I make my best and most efficient power between 90-105 rpm. Below or above those numbers I get less efficient and make less power.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •