Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-10-07, 10:55 PM   #1
Snicklefritz
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Snicklefritz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the middle of horse country, in The Garden State
Bikes:
Posts: 3,159
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Floyd, the US ADA and the offer to "rat out" Lance

What do you guys think of this:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,271395,00.html
Snicklefritz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-07, 11:09 PM   #2
voltman
It is fantastic.
 
voltman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The OC
Bikes: 05 Specialized Allez Elite; 06 Fuji Team Pro
Posts: 7,977
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Stupid Americans.
voltman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-07, 11:21 PM   #3
USAZorro
Seņor Member
 
USAZorro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florence, KY
Bikes: 1954 Hetchins M.O., 1959 Viking Severn Valley, 1970 Raleigh Pro, 1972 Fuji "The Finest", 1974 Raleigh Superbe&Comp, 1976 Raleigh Team Pro, 1996 Giant Iguana, 2000 Bob Jackson Arrowhead
Posts: 14,417
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
If USADA did make that offer, it was incredibly stupid on their part.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
USAZorro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-07, 11:25 PM   #4
donrhummy
Senior Member
 
donrhummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Wow. If this is true (and they'll deny, deny) I hope Landis' lawyer recorded the conversation. It still won't win him his case, as he's clearly being setup to lose (whether or not he's guilty), but it'll look a lot better when he sues them in a real court.
donrhummy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-07, 11:48 PM   #5
VT Biker
Senior Member
 
VT Biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Bikes: Cannondale R700 (2005)
Posts: 1,961
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
At the end of the day, it was a stupid proposition. Unless Landis has photos or other hard evidence (which I am sure he does not), it becomes a he said/she said issue. And if that is the case, Lance is going to win. What was the USADA thinking? Did they really think Landis was going to rat out Lance? He would never be welcomed in the cycling community again.

The current ethos is much like that scene from Goodfellas where Deniro tells the kid that everyone gets pinched once in a while, but the important thing is he didn't squeal.
VT Biker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-07, 11:58 PM   #6
Snicklefritz
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Snicklefritz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the middle of horse country, in The Garden State
Bikes:
Posts: 3,159
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I agree the whole proposition is really dumb. However let's say, for the sake of argument, that Landis took the bait and said something about Lance. What would the USADA hope to gain by getting info on Lance if indeed there is anything out there?

I'm tired of seeing these people go after cyclists when there are so many pro sports that are dirtier than dirty and just get mere hand slapping for offenses (I'm thinking NFL, MLB, etc.)
Snicklefritz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 02:36 AM   #7
botto 
.
 
botto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 40,362
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snicklefritz
I agree the whole proposition is really dumb. However let's say, for the sake of argument, that Landis took the bait and said something about Lance. What would the USADA hope to gain by getting info on Lance if indeed there is anything out there?

I'm tired of seeing these people go after cyclists when there are so many pro sports that are dirtier than dirty and just get mere hand slapping for offenses (I'm thinking NFL, MLB, etc.)
Seeing as he didn't, lets not.
botto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 03:25 AM   #8
roadwarrior
Senior Member
 
roadwarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Bike Business!!!
Bikes: Cannondale Super Six High Mod, Evo, Sram Red, CAAD9 Rival
Posts: 10,499
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by botto
Seeing as he didn't, lets not.
Good to see a sane person out here.
roadwarrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 03:32 AM   #9
roadwarrior
Senior Member
 
roadwarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Bike Business!!!
Bikes: Cannondale Super Six High Mod, Evo, Sram Red, CAAD9 Rival
Posts: 10,499
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snicklefritz
I agree the whole proposition is really dumb. However let's say, for the sake of argument, that Landis took the bait and said something about Lance. What would the USADA hope to gain by getting info on Lance if indeed there is anything out there?

I'm tired of seeing these people go after cyclists when there are so many pro sports that are dirtier than dirty and just get mere hand slapping for offenses (I'm thinking NFL, MLB, etc.)


To pick on the two that you mention...the USADA does not have jurusdiction over them. They do their own testing. And the NFL regularly suspends players who have positive tests.

Baseball, on the other has just seemed to have discovered this steroid thingy...

But that's not the subject of the thread.

American pro sports have their own unions, their own collective bargaining agreements, and run their own shops. And the players are not treated with the disdain that pro cyclists are. "We think you might be guilty, so we'll suspend you until we figure it out. It might take six to nine months, maybe a year, but be patient."
If people had drug testing on their jobs and were treated like this, they'd be screaming.
roadwarrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 04:13 AM   #10
patentcad
Peloton Dog
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Bikes: 2013 Scott Foil, 2014 Scott Addict, 2008 Cervelo P3 (TT), 2015 Scott Scale 700SL MTB
Posts: 59,454
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Let me state unequivocally that I the case against me has nothing to do with Cypress and any damning evidence I might be able to provide in this matter will not be forthcoming at this juncture.

That being said, anyone who sprints 40mph on his bicycle is juicing.

Or maybe I'm just really slow.
patentcad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 05:24 AM   #11
WCroadie
Senior Member
 
WCroadie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chester County, PA
Bikes: 2010 Trek Madone 5.5 CAAD9
Posts: 2,353
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Good for Landis to not even respond to that BS. I wish Armstrong would show more support for Floyd and maybe throw a little money his way.
WCroadie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 05:59 AM   #12
El Diablo Rojo
Banned.
 
El Diablo Rojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ATX, Ex So Cal
Bikes: Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu
Posts: 11,058
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by patentcad
Let me state unequivocally that I the case against me has nothing to do with Cypress and any damning evidence I might be able to provide in this matter will not be forthcoming at this juncture.

That being said, anyone who sprints 40mph on his bicycle is juicing.

Or maybe I'm just really slow.
Or both

Landis is cooked, even if he's innocent he's cooked. For him to walk away with a not guilty verdict now would embarrass every governing body involved and frankly I can't see that being allowed to happen.
El Diablo Rojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 06:15 AM   #13
botto 
.
 
botto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 40,362
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Diablo Rojo
Or both

Landis is cooked, even if he's innocent he's cooked.
For him to walk away with a not guilty verdict now would embarrass every governing body involved and frankly I can't see that being allowed to happen.
if floyd loses, the terrorists win.
botto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 06:19 AM   #14
damocles1
The mods changed this...
 
damocles1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 2,346
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think it's the principle for Floyd at this point.
damocles1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 06:53 AM   #15
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Bikes: Wilier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Co-Motion Robusta; Schwinn Paramount; Motobecane Phantom Cross; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Calfee Dragonfly Tandem
Posts: 29,131
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by USAZorro
If USADA did make that offer, it was incredibly stupid on their part.

Why? The whole criminal justice system depends on giving some criminals a break to roll on other criminals. If you didn't have plea bargaining the whole system would grind to a halt.

Why would it be shocking or wrong to apply the same principles to doping control enforcement in sports?

Last edited by merlinextraligh; 05-11-07 at 07:17 AM.
merlinextraligh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 07:15 AM   #16
El Diablo Rojo
Banned.
 
El Diablo Rojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ATX, Ex So Cal
Bikes: Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu
Posts: 11,058
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by botto
if floyd loses, the terrorists win.

You sir, are a true Patriot
El Diablo Rojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 08:04 AM   #17
USAZorro
Seņor Member
 
USAZorro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florence, KY
Bikes: 1954 Hetchins M.O., 1959 Viking Severn Valley, 1970 Raleigh Pro, 1972 Fuji "The Finest", 1974 Raleigh Superbe&Comp, 1976 Raleigh Team Pro, 1996 Giant Iguana, 2000 Bob Jackson Arrowhead
Posts: 14,417
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
Why? The whole criminal justice system depends on giving some criminals a break to roll on other criminals. If you didn't have plea bargaining the whole system would grind to a halt.

Why would it be shocking or wrong to apply the same principles to doping control enforcement in sports?
Stupid because, as VT Biker points out, even if Floyd did have knowledge of Armstrong doping, what action would they be able to pursue against Lance? All it could do would be to diminish Armstrong's reputation.

If this was what happened, it could only have been an attempt to play Floyd for the fool.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
USAZorro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 08:07 AM   #18
Bacciagalupe
Professional Fuss-Budget
 
Bacciagalupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 6,438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think Landis has gone completely off the deep end. I don't believe that the USADA did anything even remotely similar to what Landis is claiming, and he can't have much confidence in his defense if he's pulling stunts like this.

They already have what they need to determine whether or not Landis doped: test results, and extensive documentation that the defense can examine for errors and/or protocol violations.

There are no pending cases or hearings against Armstrong, and no reason for the USADA to even consider going after him.


If Landis keeps this up, WADA may lift the gag rule on sporting authorities during proceedings. And despite Landis' shenanigans, I don't think that would be a good thing....
Bacciagalupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 08:09 AM   #19
botto 
.
 
botto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 40,362
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Diablo Rojo
You sir, are a true Patriot
incorrect. i don't have enough spacers.
botto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 08:14 AM   #20
GuitarWizard
Used to be a climber..
 
GuitarWizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: East Baldwin, ME
Bikes: 2016 Ridley Fenix SL, 2013 PedalForce RS3-ISP, 2015 Trek 520 Disc
Posts: 6,834
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Lol
GuitarWizard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 08:15 AM   #21
biffstephens
Biker looking for a ride!
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Edmond Oklahoma
Bikes: Kuota Kreedo...looking for something different.
Posts: 1,480
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am completely not surprised......once again it shows the doping agencies expectations to live life in secret....the only person watching over them is Dick Pound....

Guilty or Not Guilty WADA needs to change....
biffstephens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 08:24 AM   #22
djbowen1
Senior Member
 
djbowen1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NY
Bikes: Cervelo Soliost
Posts: 2,275
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If it is true, which i believe then i would think it stems from Andreu claiming Floyd has pictures of a motorcycle with drugs in a bag that delivered to usps early in Lance's tour streak.
djbowen1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 08:30 AM   #23
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Bikes: Wilier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Co-Motion Robusta; Schwinn Paramount; Motobecane Phantom Cross; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Calfee Dragonfly Tandem
Posts: 29,131
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by USAZorro
Stupid because, as VT Biker points out, even if Floyd did have knowledge of Armstrong doping, what action would they be able to pursue against Lance? All it could do would be to diminish Armstrong's reputation.

If this was what happened, it could only have been an attempt to play Floyd for the fool.

The USADA absolutely could take action against Armstrong if they had evidence. You don't need a postive test, possession is enough for a violation (UCI Artcle 15.6.1). The statute of limitations is 8 years (UCI article 307) And the UCI rule specifically provide for reductions of period of ineligiblity for providing material assistance, so the alleged offer is consistent with the rules (UCI Article 266).

And you wouldn't need pictures. If Landis testified he observed Armstrong use PED's that would be sufficient to find a violation, as long as the USADA, and (ultimately an arbitration panel, and the Court of ARbitration for Sport) found it to be credible.

If I'm a Prosecutor, I'm absolutely going to explore whether I can get a defendant to roll up bigger players.

If I'm in charge of enforcing doping controls, I'd do the exact same thing.
merlinextraligh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 08:41 AM   #24
erader
Senior Member
 
erader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: silicon valley
Bikes:
Posts: 1,774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snicklefritz
at this point if flandis said the sky was blue i would assume it had changed colors .

ed rader
erader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-07, 08:42 AM   #25
reef58
Senior Member
 
reef58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
Bikes: Serotta Nove
Posts: 1,634
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It sounds like they are going after Lance, so if anyone is going to rat him out it will be soon. If not soon then we will have to wait for the deathbed confession.

Richard
reef58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:48 PM.