Guess Wiki's next error about Eddy
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Guess Wiki's next error about Eddy
A couple of weeks ago the Wikipedia article on Merckx said he did not finish the 1977 TDF. That wsa wrong. It has been corrected. Now the article includes
[quote]Tour de France debut in 1969, Merckx immediately won the yellow jersey (overall leader), the green jersey (best sprinter) and the red polka-dotted jersey ("King of the Mountains" - best climber in the mountain stages). No other cyclist has achieved this trifecta in the Tour de France, and only Laurent Jalabert has been able to match this feat at the Grand Tour level, in the 1995 Vuelta.[quote]
I guess technically one could say Eddy matched it in the Giro, but one other rider also walk away from one of the Grand torus with all three jerseys BEFORE Jalabert.
Two questions. Who and how could someone know about Jalabert and not the other rider.
But what I'm really wondering about is what they will get wrong next? And will it match the faix paix on Vrs. where they said Eddy won the 1969 Giro?
[quote]Tour de France debut in 1969, Merckx immediately won the yellow jersey (overall leader), the green jersey (best sprinter) and the red polka-dotted jersey ("King of the Mountains" - best climber in the mountain stages). No other cyclist has achieved this trifecta in the Tour de France, and only Laurent Jalabert has been able to match this feat at the Grand Tour level, in the 1995 Vuelta.[quote]
I guess technically one could say Eddy matched it in the Giro, but one other rider also walk away from one of the Grand torus with all three jerseys BEFORE Jalabert.
Two questions. Who and how could someone know about Jalabert and not the other rider.
But what I'm really wondering about is what they will get wrong next? And will it match the faix paix on Vrs. where they said Eddy won the 1969 Giro?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That's why it's a community driven site. Since you know the correct information you can put that into that page. Just register for free and add the correct info.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 662
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by donrhummy
That's why it's a community driven site. Since you know the correct information you can put that into that page. Just register for free and add the correct info.
"Finally, the fork is 1.5-inch diameter at the top of the fork crown and the standard 1.25-inch diameter where the stem clamps on."
Somebody must have pointed it out to them, because it's since been fixed.
#4
Double Prick
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Canadian version of Texas
Posts: 561
Bikes: Cervelo Carbon Soloist, Cervelo Aluminum Soloist, Cannondale cyclecross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
That's why it's a community driven site. Since you know the correct information you can put that into that page. Just register for free and add the correct info.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
That's why it's a community driven site. Since you know the correct information you can put that into that page. Just register for free and add the correct info.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by marin1
And people with incorrect info can post as well. Just because it is on wiki does not mean it is true. I thought it was widely known that wiki was just as much garbage as truth.
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=5055388
Most errors that crop up are found and corrected within a short period of time. That doesn't mean errors don't occur, but they're usually fixed fairly quickly and easily via discussion pages about some subject. it's a surprisingly good system and as shown in the study, as accurate as a well respected encyclopedia.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Keith99
Don't think so. If it were a case of cleaning things up once perhaps, but this error is new and I have a feeling it will get cleaned up and a newer error will take its place.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
Uh, sure but it's accuracy was found to be the same as the Encyclopedia Britannica.
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=5055388
Most errors that crop up are found and corrected within a short period of time. That doesn't mean errors don't occur, but they're usually fixed fairly quickly and easily via discussion pages about some subject. it's a surprisingly good system and as shown in the study, as accurate as a well respected encyclopedia.
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=5055388
Most errors that crop up are found and corrected within a short period of time. That doesn't mean errors don't occur, but they're usually fixed fairly quickly and easily via discussion pages about some subject. it's a surprisingly good system and as shown in the study, as accurate as a well respected encyclopedia.
#9
more ape than man
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nyc
Posts: 8,091
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
i find wiki to be a tremendous source of information. but, no source can be completely error free, wiki especially. one thing they do a good job of is to cite to their sources. i could read dozens of news articles to get the same or less information in a typical wiki entry.
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by Keith99
Very misleading. Your link is for science articles and they count errors where the information in the respected encyclopedia has information that is out of date as being the same as things that are simply wrong. Wiki is fast, it is not accurate.
ctrl-c, ctrl-v:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilberto_Simoni
https://www.answers.com/topic/gilberto-simoni
#11
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DocRay
+1, this is why most universities have banned it. It's the research equivalent of postman, and a lot of the site is plagiarized, and wrong.
What universities have banned it or do you just mean banned citing it as a source?
I don't think there are many college level courses where you can cite ANY encyclopedia.
Also
Originally Posted by answers.com
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
#12
Prefers Cicero
Originally Posted by marin1
And people with incorrect info can post as well. Just because it is on wiki does not mean it is true. I thought it was widely known that wiki was just as much garbage as truth.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DocRay
+1, this is why most universities have banned it. It's the research equivalent of postman, and a lot of the site is plagiarized, and wrong.
ctrl-c, ctrl-v:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilberto_Simoni
https://www.answers.com/topic/gilberto-simoni
ctrl-c, ctrl-v:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilberto_Simoni
https://www.answers.com/topic/gilberto-simoni