Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Senior Member Kris Flatlander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Bellevue, WA
    My Bikes
    Cannondale Super Six 1, Cannondale F29er 1, Cannondale XTJ, Guru Pista, Lemond Limoge
    Posts
    760
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Avg vs. Normalized Power?

    Now that I have a powertap I'm confused when reviewing data. Which one is better to use and what are they both anyways (ie. differences)?

  2. #2
    Quarq shill cslone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    My Bikes
    08 Felt F4, 05 Fuji Team SL, 08 Planet X Stealth, 10 Kona Jake the Snake, 03 Giant OCR flat bar.
    Posts
    3,962
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Average power is exactly what it says. Your power over the ride, averaged.

    Normalized power is the amount you would have put out had you pedaled constantly for the ride.


    When you ride, your power jumps all over the place. This variability means that the overall average power for a ride is a poor assumption of the actual intensity of the effort. Normalized power is a more accurate way of showing the effort of your ride. Coggan developed this algorithm, along with intensity factor to quantify the actual physiological toll the ride took on your body.
    FS: Fuji SL1 frameset, 55.5cm toptube, excellent condition.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    2,957
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kris Flatlander
    Now that I have a powertap I'm confused when reviewing data. Which one is better to use and what are they both anyways (ie. differences)?
    http://www.cyclingpeakssoftware.com/...11/defined.asp

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •