Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31
  1. #1
    Arschgaudi Mayonnaise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Chicago (Beverly)
    My Bikes
    Merckx Team SC, Masi (fixed), Merckx Cyclo-Cross
    Posts
    807
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Book: From Lance To Landis

    http://www.amazon.com/Lance-Landis-I...2872482&sr=8-1

    David Walsh's new book was published today. Based on the NPR interview, I'm interested in reading it. I know there's lots of mud slinging and hearsay, but I'd like to read it for myself if it's worth the time and money.

    I know he's saying stuff that isn't popular and getting blasted with a flamethower, but I'm still curious.

    Does anyone have a reasonable opinion on this guy.
    Work To Eat
    Eat To Live
    Live To Ride
    Ride To Work

  2. #2
    Senior Member geraldatwork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Long Island, New York
    My Bikes
    2005 Windsor Kennet, 1982 Raleigh Super Course
    Posts
    767
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This is what Lance (or someone who writes really well) had to say.
    Armstrong Statement on Walsh book Wednesday, June 20, 2007

    Back to Listing + Larger Font | + Smaller Font


    A statement from Lance Armstrong:
    Predictably, on the eve of the Tour de France, I will be the subject of a repeated, baseless attack in yet another unobjective book by David Walsh. Trying to jump on the bandwagon of current publicity surrounding cycling, Walsh now issues a recycled version of two earlier French books that were likewise founded upon a demonstrably false string of sensational, untrue and fabricated allegations.

    This latest attack will be no different than the first two - a sensationalized attempt to cash in on my name and sully my reputation by people who have demonstrated a consistent failure to adhere to the most basic journalistic standards or ethics. We proved in Court that Walsh and his sources have no credibility. Walsh bolstered his first two book’s accusations by knowingly using false, backdated and manufactured diary entries and documents. He violated fundamental principles by paying his sources for “information”; he then compounded his unethical conduct by lying and denying those payments until confronted with irrefutable proof to the contrary.

    The allegations and sources in the latest book remain just as baseless, unreliable and manufactured as they were in the first two books. Continuing a pattern of distortion and fabrication started in the other books, the new book takes recycled allegations from the first books and cherry-picked allegations and testimony from the losing side of a court case I won and attempts to portray them as facts. I responded in court to these allegations, most of which are made by a handful of grudge holders, axe grinders, and a so-called “expert” whose graduate degree turned out to be by way of correspondence courses -- and I proved them false. I was awarded 7.5 Million dollars in actual and punitive damages by a professional panel of legal experts who received all the evidence and heard from all the “eyewitnesses”. Every allegation and witness was confronted thoroughly, lawfully and fairly. I was vindicated yet again.

    I raced clean. I won clean. I am the most tested athlete in the history of sports. I have defended myself and my reputation and won every court case to prove I was clean. Yet another Walsh book with baseless, sensational and rejected allegations will not overcome the truth.

    Like most fair minded people, I am sick and tired of those who try to profit off the tactics of smear and guilt by innuendo or association.

    Lance Armstrong

  3. #3
    pan y agua merlinextraligh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Jacksonville
    My Bikes
    Wilier trestina Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Co-Motion Robusta; Schwinn Paramount; Motobecanne Phantom Cross; Cervelo P2
    Posts
    26,708
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^^^^
    Pays to hire good lawyers and PR people.

  4. #4
    a blend of wit and charm Moochers_Dad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    Serotta Fierte and a 1989 Centurian Prestige (plus, various others)
    Posts
    886
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
    ^^^^^
    Pays to hire good lawyers and PR people.
    I agree. It's really the best way to write a concise statement that proves what a moron David Walsh is. Although Armstrong is an author too; so he probably wrote it himself.

    I found a bootleg copies online of the English translation of Walsh's book. And it's clearly a lot of fabrication; but still entertaining to read.

  5. #5
    DocRay
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Moochers_Dad
    I agree. It's really the best way to write a concise statement that proves what a moron David Walsh is. Although Armstrong is an author too; so he probably wrote it himself.

    I found a bootleg copies online of the English translation of Walsh's book. And it's clearly a lot of fabrication; but still entertaining to read.
    Armstrong never wrote anything. He has "editors", and a considerable budget of lawyers.

    Walsh's books are not very good and not very believable, much like Armstrong's books.

  6. #6
    . botto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    40,275
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayonnaise
    http://www.amazon.com/Lance-Landis-I...2872482&sr=8-1

    David Walsh's new book was published today. Based on the NPR interview, I'm interested in reading it. I know there's lots of mud slinging and hearsay, but I'd like to read it for myself if
    it's worth the time and money.

    I know he's saying stuff that isn't popular and getting blasted with a flamethower, but I'm still curious.

    Does anyone have a reasonable opinion on this guy.
    doubtful.

  7. #7
    DocRay
    Guest
    What's good is that amazon has bundles it with other BS cycling books..one stop shopping of delusion.

    Buy this book with Positively False: The Real Story of How I Won the Tour de France by Floyd Landis today!

    Buy Together Today: $35.15

    +

  8. #8
    Slow'n'Aero DrWJODonnell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Driving the pace in the crosswind
    Posts
    2,599
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just finished reading the book. My opinion has been swayed a bit. I have to say that while I think that the amount of conjecture is staggering, and I think in many places a REEEEEEAAAAAAAL stretch, I do believe that there was enough in the way of fact to make me re-think the whole Lance story.

    I did find it particularly amusing reading the supposed arguments between the Australian exercise and sports scientist/anti-doping crusader Dr Ashenden and Dr. Coyle. But maybe it is just because I understand a bit more about exercise physiology than I do about the euro doping scene.

    Sorry to resurrect the thread as the whole doping thing has been talked to death, but I did not want to start a new one. Anyone have an idea of who the euro pro cyclist might be who was discussed in the very end?

  9. #9
    Senior Member classic1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    5,019
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sorry to resurrect the thread as the whole doping thing has been talked to death, but I did not want to start a new one. Anyone have an idea of who the euro pro cyclist might be who was discussed in the very end?
    Haven't read it. Give us a brief overview and someone might be able to work it out.

  10. #10
    Peloton Dog patentcad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Chester, NY
    My Bikes
    2013 Scott Foil, 2009 Scott Addict R2, 2008 Cervelo P3 TT bike, 2008 Motobecane Fly Ti Hard Tail MTB
    Posts
    55,759
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DrWJODonnell View Post
    Just finished reading the book. My opinion has been swayed a bit. I have to say that while I think that the amount of conjecture is staggering, and I think in many places a REEEEEEAAAAAAAL stretch, I do believe that there was enough in the way of fact to make me re-think the whole Lance story.

    I did find it particularly amusing reading the supposed arguments between the Australian exercise and sports scientist/anti-doping crusader Dr Ashenden and Dr. Coyle. But maybe it is just because I understand a bit more about exercise physiology than I do about the euro doping scene.

    Sorry to resurrect the thread as the whole doping thing has been talked to death, but I did not want to start a new one. Anyone have an idea of who the euro pro cyclist might be who was discussed in the very end?
    But I have re-thought the whole Lance story. I'm convinced that virtually all the cyclists of his era were doping. Which means it was a level playing field. And to me, that makes this whole 'debate' a major 'what's your point' topic. It only makes Lance look craftier than the cyclists who got nailed for doping (and most of those who doped in his era clearly never got snagged).

    Regardless, there is nothing to be gained for anyone if Lance ever confessed. There would only be pain and loss, particularly in the cancer community. And for what? So DocRay can say 'I told you so' and all the idiots that confuse the pro cycling business with some Hallowed Ground of Sportsmanship? Direct your misdirected search for morality someplace more appropriate. Politics in Washington DC might be a good place to start.

    Changes nothing for me. Essential truth: Lance gets very sick, somehow manages to survive (that alone was rather miraculous), then Lance inspires millions of cancer patients and their loved ones when he wins 7 Tours. That unprecedented feat remains utterly astonishing even if he was taking EPO, HGH, Steroids and Crank. Even if nobody else was doping. But they were. And you all know it. Lance's story is much bigger than cycling. Cycling is a friggin footnote in that Big Picture. And if you don't get that, you don't get anything.

    Whatever. Go Giants. Thank God the NFL is clean, eh?
    Last edited by patentcad; 01-31-08 at 09:30 PM.

  11. #11
    Blast from the Past Voodoo76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Schertz TX
    My Bikes
    Old ones
    Posts
    2,463
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by patentcad View Post
    And you all know it. Lance's story is much bigger than cycling. Cycling is a friggin footnote in that Big Picture. And if you don't get that, you don't get anything.
    But the emperor, as remarkable as his story is, has no cloths! He's stark friking naked. Integrity my freind, isn't about how "big" your story is. It's about time our sport had a little.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Bullseye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    My Bikes
    Cannondale systemsix, Raleigh Competition '05
    Posts
    498
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by patentcad View Post
    But I have re-thought the whole Lance story. I'm convinced that virtually all the cyclists of his era were doping. Which means it was a level playing field. And to me, that makes this whole 'debate' a major 'what's your point' topic. It only makes Lance look craftier than the cyclists who got nailed for doping (and most of those who doped in his era clearly never got snagged).

    Regardless, there is nothing to be gained for anyone if Lance ever confessed. There would only be pain and loss, particularly in the cancer community. And for what? So DocRay can say 'I told you so' and all the idiots that confuse the pro cycling business with some Hallowed Ground of Sportsmanship? Direct your misdirected search for morality someplace more appropriate. Politics in Washington DC might be a good place to start.

    Changes nothing for me. Essential truth: Lance gets very sick, somehow manages to survive (that alone was rather miraculous), then Lance inspires millions of cancer patients and their loved ones when he wins 7 Tours. That unprecedented feat remains utterly astonishing even if he was taking EPO, HGH, Steroids and Crank. Even if nobody else was doping. But they were. And you all know it. Lance's story is much bigger than cycling. Cycling is a friggin footnote in that Big Picture. And if you don't get that, you don't get anything.

    Whatever. Go Giants. Thank God the NFL is clean, eh?
    Wow. For once, I entirely agree with PCad, with no reservations!

    -bullseye

  13. #13
    My idea of fun kensuf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    My Bikes
    '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '02 Kona Lavadome, '07 Giant TCR Advanced, '07 Karate Monkey
    Posts
    9,727
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bullseye View Post
    Wow. For once, I entirely agree with PCad, with no reservations!

    -bullseye
    Incorrect.

    The pats all the way baby.

    Putting the Duh in Floriduh.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    754
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by patentcad View Post
    But I have re-thought the whole Lance story. I'm convinced that virtually all the cyclists of his era were doping. Which means it was a level playing field. And to me, that makes this whole 'debate' a major 'what's your point' topic.
    I don't know. It seems possible to me that those with big money and power behind them like Lance would be able to more thoroughly investigate various doping alternatives, more thoroughly calculate the risks of various doping protocols, and in the end engage in a doping program that is superior to that of the average pro. Of course there is no way of knowing whether this was the case or not. I am just recognizing it as a possibility.

  15. #15
    Announcer EventServices's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    In the drops.
    My Bikes
    Too many and not enough
    Posts
    4,963
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    PCad, I agree completely.

    Like it or not, we all have to help perpetuate The Great Lie because the general public wants a hero to believe in.

  16. #16
    slow up hills kudude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    My Bikes
    Giant TCR, Redline CX, Ritchey Breakaway, Spec S-works epic
    Posts
    4,928
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Skewer View Post
    I don't know. It seems possible to me that those with big money and power behind them like Lance would be able to more thoroughly investigate various doping alternatives, more thoroughly calculate the risks of various doping protocols, and in the end engage in a doping program that is superior to that of the average pro. Of course there is no way of knowing whether this was the case or not. I am just recognizing it as a possibility.
    ha
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_tom View Post
    Cycling isn't a sport. It's more like a really, really expensive eating disorder.

  17. #17
    Burning Matches. ElJamoquio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Le Champion SL, Cervelo P2SL
    Posts
    9,660
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Skewer View Post
    I don't know. It seems possible to me that those with big money and power behind them like Lance would be able to more thoroughly investigate various doping alternatives, more thoroughly calculate the risks of various doping protocols, and in the end engage in a doping program that is superior to that of the average pro. Of course there is no way of knowing whether this was the case or not. I am just recognizing it as a possibility.
    So... you're saying he cheated better than everyone else? That doesn't fill me with sympathy for incompetent dopers.

    And I'm not privy to financial statements, etc, but he didn't get big money deals until after he won his (at a minimum) first TdF.
    Reacting is mind candy; it requires no thought. Thinking is tedious.

    Bikeforums 'Group Buy': Kinlin Rims, Sapim/DT Spokes, Formula/Bitex Hubs


    "The only good race pace is suicide pace, and today looks like a good day to die."
    -Steve Prefontaine

  18. #18
    Peloton Dog patentcad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Chester, NY
    My Bikes
    2013 Scott Foil, 2009 Scott Addict R2, 2008 Cervelo P3 TT bike, 2008 Motobecane Fly Ti Hard Tail MTB
    Posts
    55,759
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ElJamoquio View Post
    So... you're saying he cheated better than everyone else?
    Excellence in this regard is no vice.

  19. #19
    Burning Matches. ElJamoquio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Le Champion SL, Cervelo P2SL
    Posts
    9,660
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't really care too much one way or the other, but my point (I think I had one) was that you're nit-picking/sour-grapes if you say he won because he doped better than the other dopers.
    Reacting is mind candy; it requires no thought. Thinking is tedious.

    Bikeforums 'Group Buy': Kinlin Rims, Sapim/DT Spokes, Formula/Bitex Hubs


    "The only good race pace is suicide pace, and today looks like a good day to die."
    -Steve Prefontaine

  20. #20
    Slow'n'Aero DrWJODonnell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Driving the pace in the crosswind
    Posts
    2,599
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by classic1 View Post
    Haven't read it. Give us a brief overview and someone might be able to work it out.
    "Four years ago, I traveled to Milan to meet a young American who had recently moved from Colorado to Italy. He told a story about a friend of his, a European-born pro cyclist..."

    (Four years ago would put it in 2002-2003 as per publish date of the book?)

    "Though the young man told me the cyclist's name, he did not want the guy publicly shamed, mostly because of the attention that would fall on the whistle-blower. I follow the rider's performances each year, and over the last three seasons, he has become quite a star. He has won stages of the Tour d France and is expected to claim another in 2007. Journalists write about him as a man and athlete we should admire."

    I have a guess, but I know you guys know the Euro Peloton much better than I.

    Any suggestions?

  21. #21
    Senior Member Homebrew01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ffld Cnty Connecticut
    My Bikes
    Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
    Posts
    14,421
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by patentcad View Post
    But I have re-thought the whole Lance story. I'm convinced that virtually all the cyclists of his era were doping. Which means it was a level playing field. And to me, that makes this whole 'debate' a major 'what's your point' topic. It only makes Lance look craftier than the cyclists who got nailed for doping (and most of those who doped in his era clearly never got snagged).

    Regardless, there is nothing to be gained for anyone if Lance ever confessed. There would only be pain and loss, particularly in the cancer community. And for what? So DocRay can say 'I told you so' and all the idiots that confuse the pro cycling business with some Hallowed Ground of Sportsmanship? Direct your misdirected search for morality someplace more appropriate. Politics in Washington DC might be a good place to start.

    Changes nothing for me. Essential truth: Lance gets very sick, somehow manages to survive (that alone was rather miraculous), then Lance inspires millions of cancer patients and their loved ones when he wins 7 Tours. That unprecedented feat remains utterly astonishing even if he was taking EPO, HGH, Steroids and Crank. Even if nobody else was doping. But they were. And you all know it. Lance's story is much bigger than cycling. Cycling is a friggin footnote in that Big Picture. And if you don't get that, you don't get anything.

    Whatever. Go Giants. Thank God the NFL is clean, eh?
    Correct, mostly. Some that got caught were just as crafty, but someone squealed on them, or an underling was sloppy and left evidence. He wasn't using anything special. He would use EPO at specific times to boost blood, then save off packets of blood in the freezer for later use. Blood doping is essentially undetectable. The pros are still doping, but I'm sure they're being much more careful with EPO and testosterone than they were before.

    I agree that during Lance's era, it's quite possible that "they we're all doing it", but not so earlier. Greg LeMond got burned the year after his last TdF win because Indurain and the other started using EPO and he didn't. So although Greg was in his best shape ever, guys that he blew away the year before were now blowing him away. Pros at that level don't just magically improve 10% from 1 year to the next. Just like "Flo-Jo" in running. Did you ever see the "before" and "after" pictures of her when she started doping ?
    Last edited by Homebrew01; 02-03-08 at 01:25 PM.
    Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike

  22. #22
    rog
    rog is offline
    militant buddhist rog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Old Bridge, NJ
    My Bikes
    '08 Scott CR-1 Pro, '02 Jamis Nova
    Posts
    1,609
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DrWJODonnell View Post
    Just finished reading the book. My opinion has been swayed a bit. I have to say that while I think that the amount of conjecture is staggering, and I think in many places a REEEEEEAAAAAAAL stretch, I do believe that there was enough in the way of fact to make me re-think the whole Lance story.

    I did find it particularly amusing reading the supposed arguments between the Australian exercise and sports scientist/anti-doping crusader Dr Ashenden and Dr. Coyle. But maybe it is just because I understand a bit more about exercise physiology than I do about the euro doping scene.

    Sorry to resurrect the thread as the whole doping thing has been talked to death, but I did not want to start a new one. Anyone have an idea of who the euro pro cyclist might be who was discussed in the very end?
    It was Rasmussen. A guy who he used to race mountain bikes with was coming over to Europe, Ras asked him to bring over a pair of shoes, blah blah. That's all in the book, right? The guy (whose name I can't remember) decided to go on the record after Ras said he wasn't doping during the Tour.

    Here's an article about it.
    Last edited by rog; 02-03-08 at 01:17 PM.
    -r

  23. #23
    rog
    rog is offline
    militant buddhist rog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Old Bridge, NJ
    My Bikes
    '08 Scott CR-1 Pro, '02 Jamis Nova
    Posts
    1,609
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ElJamoquio View Post
    So... you're saying he cheated better than everyone else? That doesn't fill me with sympathy for incompetent dopers.

    And I'm not privy to financial statements, etc, but he didn't get big money deals until after he won his (at a minimum) first TdF.
    He had a $2 million dollar deal with Cofidis just before he got cancer. That's pretty big money, in my book...
    -r

  24. #24
    Senior Member classic1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    5,019
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DrWJODonnell View Post
    "Four years ago, I traveled to Milan to meet a young American who had recently moved from Colorado to Italy. He told a story about a friend of his, a European-born pro cyclist..."

    (Four years ago would put it in 2002-2003 as per publish date of the book?)

    "Though the young man told me the cyclist's name, he did not want the guy publicly shamed, mostly because of the attention that would fall on the whistle-blower. I follow the rider's performances each year, and over the last three seasons, he has become quite a star. He has won stages of the Tour d France and is expected to claim another in 2007. Journalists write about him as a man and athlete we should admire."

    I have a guess, but I know you guys know the Euro Peloton much better than I.

    Any suggestions?
    Best guess the seppo is Danielson and the Italian is Basso (when they were at Fasso Bortolo), but there are likely other candidates.

  25. #25
    Slow'n'Aero DrWJODonnell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Driving the pace in the crosswind
    Posts
    2,599
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by classic1 View Post
    Best guess the seppo is Danielson and the Italian is Basso (when they were at Fasso Bortolo), but there are likely other candidates.
    No. Roq hit it on the head. The link matches up quite well with the story.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •