Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-26-03, 09:56 PM   #1
extomesm
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
extomesm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Bikes:
Posts: 135
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
pedaling cadence

i think we have all noticed that the pedaling cadence of jan and lance are alot different. jan uses the big gears for slower pedaling but more distance per stroke while lance uses the opposite a smaller gear with a faster pedaling action. i find a quicker quicker tempo werx better for me only cuz i have not the massive legs of ulrich so i find that i prefer the smaller gear witha quicker pedaling action. i was just wondering what everyone elses thoughts on this was.
extomesm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-03, 08:31 AM   #2
Bik'n' Rev.
Junior Member
 
Bik'n' Rev.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kohler, WI
Bikes:
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I believe that when I read Lance Armstrong and Chris Carmicheal's book on training (the title escapes me), Chris talked about how Lance is somewhat of an anomaly because he produces more power at a high cadence in a lower gear than he does "mashing" the lower gears. Perhaps Jan has done his own studies and found that he produces more power in the lower gears.

Bottom-line: it's all about the individual.
Bik'n' Rev. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-03, 10:19 AM   #3
roadbuzz
Just ride.
 
roadbuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: C-ville, Va
Bikes:
Posts: 3,246
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If you were able to see any television coverage, you'd notice (under normal circumstances) Lance's cadence is very similar to the other riders. He'll go ballistic for attacks and some time trials. Jan, on the other hand, is almost always pedaling noticably slower.

I think your experience agrees with what most riders find. Pushing a big gear tires muscles, and requires hours for recovery. Whereas spinning a lower gear drives up the heart rate and respiration, and for most of us, is slower. But recovery comes in minutes.
roadbuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-03, 11:23 AM   #4
Captain Crunch
Mad For Marinoni !!!
 
Captain Crunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Matheson, Ontario, Canada
Bikes:
Posts: 438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
When watching the two ITT's during the tour I thought it looked like Lance could have managed to gear up a little as it appeared that he was pedalling at such a high cadence that he seemed to be bouncing a little. I wonder if it would have been more effective to jump up one gear. His cadence would hardly have changed. I know that Lance knows more about this than anyone but that is how it appeared to me watching it.

The other thing I noticed about most of the riders in the TT's was that they were all over the road (ok, maybe not from one side to the other but certainly not straight as an arrow) and not keeping that nice line we all try to mimic while spending hours on the rollers for that smooth stroke. Maybe they were seeing thing in or on the road that the T.V. coverage was not picking up but it looked more like they were just exerting so much energy that they weaved all over the road.
Captain Crunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-03, 07:52 PM   #5
2stupid2quitnow
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Have any of you measured your heart rate at a slower vs. faster cadence? Or is it more important to measure the cadence by wattage alone? I know for myself that I can maintain a higher cadence longer than a slower "mashing" cadence.

I thought Ullrich's cadence was too heavy to allow him to respond quickly on the climbs.
2stupid2quitnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-03, 08:38 PM   #6
RiPHRaPH
Don't Believe the Hype
 
RiPHRaPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: chicagoland area
Bikes: 1999 Steelman SR525, 2002 Lightspeed Ultimate, 1988 Trek 830, 2008 Scott Addict
Posts: 2,585
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
and that is why Jan has had all the knee surgeries. but he is a different build than Lance. when Lance stands, he seems to dance on the pedals. Jan can't do this/.
RiPHRaPH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-03, 09:58 PM   #7
Jaimie65
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hobart, Tasmania
Bikes:
Posts: 73
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The book is the Lance Armstrong Performance Program - written by LA and his coach Chris Carmichael good read and good training book whatever your standard.
To mash or not to mash - apparently Ullrich has tested the higher cadence (110+) and the juice just aint there - that's why he sticks with the knee crunching, thigh burning, mind altering 90 rpm - just like the rest of us.
Jaimie65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-03, 08:51 PM   #8
Trouble
Sloth Hunter
 
Trouble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Bikes: 03 Lemond Zurich (Sold) 07 Steelman Custom steel road bike
Posts: 408
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by 2stupid2quitnow
Have any of you measured your heart rate at a slower vs. faster cadence? Or is it more important to measure the cadence by wattage alone? I know for myself that I can maintain a higher cadence longer than a slower "mashing" cadence.
I've done a little experimenting with HR and cadence.
My HR increases with higher cadence, actually my HR increases in relation to effort in either mode; mashing or spinning.
In the drops on a slight down hill slope at a 95rpm cadence putting out what I think is little effort, my HRM indicates 87%/max. This I can never figure out.
Maybe it's that I'm using more of the larger glutes. :confused:
Trouble is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:57 PM.