Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 29
  1. #1
    Sensible shoes. CastIron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    St. Paul,MN
    My Bikes
    A few.
    Posts
    8,799
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Poor man's zipps?

    Cane Creek Aros 58 Road, half the cost of Zipps, and there is at least a smidge of potential to get these over the winter months. So anyone know anything about 'em? Viable for a 215# fella? It would be a race only wheelset.

    Last edited by CastIron; 08-15-07 at 04:45 PM.
    Mike
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    It looks silly when you have quotes from other forum members in your signature. Nobody on this forum is that funny.
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    Why am I in your signature.

  2. #2
    Senior Member djbowen1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    NY
    My Bikes
    Cervelo Soliost
    Posts
    2,283
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    they are probably a gigantex rim, which is also used on the token wheels and quite a few others. The hubs are decent. Depends what the price and weight is. i had the Token branded ones and i noticed a crazy amount of flex when out of the saddle. I am only 140lbs.

  3. #3
    nom nom nom Frunkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Wisconsin
    My Bikes
    Lemond Tete de Course, Slingshot DDX, Fuji Track Pro, Surly Steamroller
    Posts
    2,096
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    heavy

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,918
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why not go with the Neuvation C48s or 50s?

  5. #5
    Sensible shoes. CastIron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    St. Paul,MN
    My Bikes
    A few.
    Posts
    8,799
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Neuvation is pretty much out as I'm a clyde on Campy according to their own info.
    Mike
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    It looks silly when you have quotes from other forum members in your signature. Nobody on this forum is that funny.
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    Why am I in your signature.

  6. #6
    Mitcholo CrimsonKarter21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
    My Bikes
    2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
    Posts
    8,851
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by djbowen1 View Post
    they are probably a gigantex rim, which is also used on the token wheels and quite a few others. The hubs are decent. Depends what the price and weight is. i had the Token branded ones and i noticed a crazy amount of flex when out of the saddle. I am only 140lbs.
    WRONG! Can Creek uses the non-dimpled version of the 404 rim, their hubs are great, they come in different colors, there is a heavier version if you want to spend a little less, and they're stiff.
    The Aros 58 would be my first choice for a race wheelset if I was tight on budget and couldn't afford Zipps but wanted carbon.
    Also, they're only about 100g more than the new 404's, and are very stiff.
    If you're on a team, CC might be able to give you a little break, since I know they help out a lot of athletes by hooking them up with cheap components. I've never seen the road version in person, but I know the track version is VERY popular.

    E-mail CC about your weight and riding style and see what they say.

  7. #7
    Race to train jrennie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    suffering on the back
    Posts
    3,115
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would stay away from carbon tubulars at 215 but if you do, dont get anything with cx-ray spokes. They are more aero and lighter but lower weight limits. The lew vt-1's have no weight limit

  8. #8
    Professional Fuss-Budget Bacciagalupe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,304
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't know any poor men who can afford to blow $1100 on bike wheels, by the way.

  9. #9
    Senior Member djbowen1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    NY
    My Bikes
    Cervelo Soliost
    Posts
    2,283
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    unless you have some facts i still have to say they are not zipp. the front wheel weights 810g and the rear is 1060. 1870 grams for a set of tubular wheels is absurd.

  10. #10
    it's your bicycle bells popdelusions's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    378
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by djbowen1 View Post
    unless you have some facts i still have to say they are not zipp. the front wheel weights 810g and the rear is 1060. 1870 grams for a set of tubular wheels is absurd.
    I have a pair of the tubulars. Specs given at that link are for the clinchers; it isn't that far off the 404 (these are definitely Zipp rims, previous generations of CC Aros wheels used a Reynolds rim). The CC build is a little heavier than the Zipp for obvious reasons (two "nipples" per spoke, 28 spokes out back, a lot of metal in that rear hub), but it's still a pretty lightweight wheelset. Definitely a good budget alternative to 404s.

  11. #11
    Mitcholo CrimsonKarter21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
    My Bikes
    2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
    Posts
    8,851
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Zipp's rim is a 58mm depth, and IIRC, Token's is a 56mm. Cane Creek isn't going to come out and say that their rims are made by Zipp.

    Here is the tubular version with the correct weights, SS version and Team Issue version of them.

  12. #12
    I'm so much cooler online eriksbliss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    297
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You may want to consider Flash-Point wheels. The FP60's are clinchers at about the same weight as these, true deep-section carbon rim (not just fairing), aero spokes. Made by Zipp so presumably the quality is Zipp-level (and my understanding is that the FP's are basically Zipps design from a few years ago). Nice hubs. Good looking. And they have held my 230# for a triathlon and time trial racing season with no problems.

  13. #13
    Peloton Dog patentcad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Chester, NY
    My Bikes
    2013 Scott Foil, 2009 Scott Addict R2, 2008 Cervelo P3 TT bike, 2008 Motobecane Fly Ti Hard Tail MTB
    Posts
    55,984
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Zipp says their 404 clinchers weigh about 1500 grams for a set. That's 300+ grams lighter than those CC's. That's not 'close'.

  14. #14
    Sensible shoes. CastIron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    St. Paul,MN
    My Bikes
    A few.
    Posts
    8,799
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    IF--and it's a truly huge if--I go the route of seep section carbon wheels, then they will be tubular. Totally. FlashPoint wheels are clinchers. Further, there seems little point to get carbon tubbies if they have a big ole aluminum rim embedded, which the Cane Creeks do not appear to. For the price point ($1100) I can't seem to come up with much else. PCAD, the weight comes in at 1495g/pair. That's on par with the 404 Pave/cx wheels I'd actually get (one set to race in everything and handle my capacious caboose).
    Mike
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    It looks silly when you have quotes from other forum members in your signature. Nobody on this forum is that funny.
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    Why am I in your signature.

  15. #15
    it's your bicycle bells popdelusions's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    378
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by patentcad View Post
    Zipp says their 404 clinchers weigh about 1500 grams for a set. That's 300+ grams lighter than those CC's. That's not 'close'.
    No they don't...Zipp claims 788/884, so around 1700 grams. It ends up being the same differential as for the tubulars.

    Trust me, CC uses Zipp rims, same OEM deal as Ritchey, American Classic, etcetera. These aren't Gigantex rims.

  16. #16
    Zippy Engineer Waldo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    IN
    My Bikes
    Bianchi 928, Bianchi Pista Concept 2004, Surly Steamroller, 1998 Schwinn Factory Team Homegrown, 1999 Schwinn Homegrown Factory, 2000 Schwinn Panther, Niner EMD9
    Posts
    1,801
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by djbowen1 View Post
    unless you have some facts i still have to say they are not zipp. the front wheel weights 810g and the rear is 1060. 1870 grams for a set of tubular wheels is absurd.
    I work at Zipp and can confirm that Cane Creek definitely uses our rims, though I have heard that they may be abandoning the wheel market so you might be able to score a deal.

  17. #17
    Senior Member djbowen1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    NY
    My Bikes
    Cervelo Soliost
    Posts
    2,283
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Waldo View Post
    I work at Zipp and can confirm that Cane Creek definitely uses our rims, though I have heard that they may be abandoning the wheel market so you might be able to score a deal.
    And i work at Cervelo and can confirm pedal force uses our frames. Im kidding. Goog to know, thats the weight then for tub?

  18. #18
    Mitcholo CrimsonKarter21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
    My Bikes
    2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
    Posts
    8,851
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Waldo View Post
    I work at Zipp and can confirm that Cane Creek definitely uses our rims, though I have heard that they may be abandoning the wheel market so you might be able to score a deal.
    Where is this info coming from!? Is this straight from Cane Creek, or is this through analyzing stats and sales?

  19. #19
    Cat. 2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    33
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They no longer have the Aros 58 in stock and are not planning to make anymore of them any time soon. I just tried to place a team order 2 weeks ago and they said that they phasing out most if not all wheels, they just are not economical anymore.

  20. #20
    delicious 40x14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    nyc downtown
    My Bikes
    The one under my bum.
    Posts
    317
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  21. #21
    I like pie! BCgoFHS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    SoCal baby!
    Posts
    64
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    How about Ritchey WCS Carbon tubies? They weight in at 1336, not too bad, and can be had for around 1.1k. Plus Ritchey has a good crash replacement policy.
    Bold, Cheesy, Graceful, Overwhelming, Funny, Hardworking, Sophisticated
    Damn I am good!

  22. #22
    DocRay
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by djbowen1 View Post
    And i work at Cervelo and can confirm pedal force uses our frames. Im kidding. Goog to know, thats the weight then for tub?
    I work for LOOK and can confirm Cervelo copies all our frames.

    [IMG][/IMG]

  23. #23
    DocRay
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by popdelusions View Post
    No they don't...Zipp claims 788/884, so around 1700 grams. It ends up being the same differential as for the tubulars.

    Trust me, CC uses Zipp rims, same OEM deal as Ritchey, American Classic, etcetera. These aren't Gigantex rims.
    Flashpoints are 774/958, for $1100.
    404s are 788/884, for $2000+, but if you are above 180, they recommend clysdales.

    $900 is a quite a lot for some dimples. You could get 600g lighter for less.

    anywhoo...the bullsh*t expensive wheel market is tanking, which is why cane creek is heading out.

  24. #24
    EdZ
    EdZ is offline
    Clinically Insane EdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    765
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BCgoFHS View Post
    How about Ritchey WCS Carbon tubies? They weight in at 1336, not too bad, and can be had for around 1.1k. Plus Ritchey has a good crash replacement policy.

    Which is?

  25. #25
    Sensible shoes. CastIron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    St. Paul,MN
    My Bikes
    A few.
    Posts
    8,799
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Ritchey wheels look like a decent option, particularly if the CC jobs are to be no more. WTH doesn't flashpoint make a full carbon tubbie?
    Mike
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    It looks silly when you have quotes from other forum members in your signature. Nobody on this forum is that funny.
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    Why am I in your signature.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •