Landis: Breaking News
#1
Wer wagt, gewinnt.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 124
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Landis: Breaking News
From the AP wire:
Arbitrators find Landis guilty of doping, rule he must forfeit 2006 Tour title
By EDDIE PELLS, AP National Writer
September 20, 2007
PARIS (AP) -- Floyd Landis lost his expensive and explosive doping case Thursday when the arbitrators upheld the results of a test that showed the 2006 Tour de France champion used synthetic testosterone to fuel his spectacular comeback victory, The Associated Press has learned.
The decision, handed down nearly four months after a bizarre and bitterly fought hearing, leaves Landis with only one more outlet to possibly salvage his title -- an appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport"
https://sports.yahoo.com/sc/news;_ylt...v=ap&type=lgns
Arbitrators find Landis guilty of doping, rule he must forfeit 2006 Tour title
By EDDIE PELLS, AP National Writer
September 20, 2007
PARIS (AP) -- Floyd Landis lost his expensive and explosive doping case Thursday when the arbitrators upheld the results of a test that showed the 2006 Tour de France champion used synthetic testosterone to fuel his spectacular comeback victory, The Associated Press has learned.
The decision, handed down nearly four months after a bizarre and bitterly fought hearing, leaves Landis with only one more outlet to possibly salvage his title -- an appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport"
https://sports.yahoo.com/sc/news;_ylt...v=ap&type=lgns
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Not a surprise. What is a surprise is the group finding that the initial test was invalid:
In its 84-page decision, the majority found the initial screening test to measure Landis' testosterone levels — the testosterone-to-epitestosterone test — was not done according to World Anti-Doping Agency rules.
But the more precise and expensive carbon-isotope ration analysis (IRMS), performed after a positive T-E test is recorded, was accurate, the arbitrators said, meaning "an anti-doping rule violation is established."
But the more precise and expensive carbon-isotope ration analysis (IRMS), performed after a positive T-E test is recorded, was accurate, the arbitrators said, meaning "an anti-doping rule violation is established."
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lactate Threshold
Posts: 584
Bikes: Orbea
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The USADA is funded by the US goverment......they needed to net a big fish to keep your tax money flowing.
#4
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts