Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Burning Matches. ElJamoquio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Le Champion SL, Cervelo P2SL
    Posts
    9,663
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Crank Length for TT's

    Stats:

    Height 5'9"
    Bike Inseam ~32"
    TT Crank Length: 172.5 mm
    Road Crank Length: 172.5 mm

    Like many/most, the major factor limiting my TT position is hip angle. If I go down as far as I'd like in the bars, there's almost a dead spot towards the top of my pedalling stroke. I'm working on my flexibility, but I doubt it'll make my on-the-hoods FTP (~300 watts) equal my TT FTP (~270 watts???)

    I'm pretty happy with my road crank length; but if I had to choose, I'd pick 170. If I had to blindly pick a TT length, I'd go with 165 or 167.5. Anyone go down a size or two in crank length for their TT bike?
    Reacting is mind candy; it requires no thought. Thinking is tedious.

    Bikeforums 'Group Buy': Kinlin Rims, Sapim/DT Spokes, Formula/Bitex Hubs


    "The only good race pace is suicide pace, and today looks like a good day to die."
    -Steve Prefontaine

  2. #2
    . botto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    40,336
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    um... maybe i'm getting old and senile, like roadwarrior/eldiablorojo/patentcad, but i seem to recall the philosophy was to go for longer, not shorter cranks in a TT.

  3. #3
    Quarq shill cslone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    My Bikes
    08 Felt F4, 05 Fuji Team SL, 08 Planet X Stealth, 10 Kona Jake the Snake, 03 Giant OCR flat bar.
    Posts
    3,962
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yep, generally people go up in length. I went from 172.5's to 175's for the TT bike and actually liked it enough to go 175 on all my bikes.
    FS: Fuji SL1 frameset, 55.5cm toptube, excellent condition.

  4. #4
    Burning Matches. ElJamoquio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Le Champion SL, Cervelo P2SL
    Posts
    9,663
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by botto View Post
    um... maybe i'm getting old and senile, like roadwarrior/eldiablorojo/patentcad, but i seem to recall the philosophy was to go for longer, not shorter cranks in a TT.
    Nope. That's the philosphy. I'm not looking for more power, I'm looking to be more aero.
    Reacting is mind candy; it requires no thought. Thinking is tedious.

    Bikeforums 'Group Buy': Kinlin Rims, Sapim/DT Spokes, Formula/Bitex Hubs


    "The only good race pace is suicide pace, and today looks like a good day to die."
    -Steve Prefontaine

  5. #5
    . botto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    40,336
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ElJamoquio View Post
    Nope. That's the philosphy. I'm not looking for more power, I'm looking to be more aero.
    cranks aren't your answer.

  6. #6
    Compressed
    Guest
    Actually ElJamoquio is on the right track. The big thing is that he can lower the front end more because as he said the hip angle is not as acute.
    Last edited by Compressed; 01-28-08 at 04:38 PM.

  7. #7
    Racing iS my Training Pizza Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    San Francisco
    My Bikes
    07 Bianchi San Jose, 08 Tarmac SL2, 05 Cervelo P3
    Posts
    1,263
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hmmm, I was wondering the same thing.
    I'm 5'9" with a 31" inseam.
    I've always ridden 172.5 on the road and just bought a used P3 (my first TT bike) with 170's.
    I plan to stick with the 170's for a least this season since I don't feel like buying 172.5's.

  8. #8
    Carbon Fiber Bones elgalad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    My Bikes
    '07 Scott Speedster S30
    Posts
    980
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Compressed View Post
    Actually ElJamoquio is on the right track. Going down in crank length lets you lower your seat the length dropped which makes on lower obviously, the gain of this is that wind speed is usually less or calmer closer to the ground. The bigger thing is that he can lower the front end more because as he said the hip angle is not as acute.
    Errr, you've got that backwards. If you go to a shorter crank length, you have to raise your seat because the pedal is closer to your body at the bottom of the pedal stroke. This may help with aerodynamics by getting your front end lower relative to your seat, but if you're on anything resembling the correct frame size, it should not be necessary.

    As botto said, the rule is to go for a slightly longer crank on the TT bike. I run a 170mm crank on my road bike, and a 172.5mm crank on the TT bike, as the slightly longer crank feels a bit more comfortable at the relatively lower (90-100 rpm) cadences I use for time trialing.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Athens, Ohio
    My Bikes
    Custom Custom Custom
    Posts
    5,104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I stick with the same length, mainly because its what I have around and dont want to do a $500 experiment on crank arm length for the 2-3 TT's I do a year. And its pretty hard to find 177.5 arms.

  10. #10
    Compressed
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by elgalad View Post
    Errr, you've got that backwards. If you go to a shorter crank length, you have to raise your seat because the pedal is closer to your body at the bottom of the pedal stroke. This may help with aerodynamics by getting your front end lower relative to your seat, but if you're on anything resembling the correct frame size, it should not be necessary.

    As botto said, the rule is to go for a slightly longer crank on the TT bike. I run a 170mm crank on my road bike, and a 172.5mm crank on the TT bike, as the slightly longer crank feels a bit more comfortable at the relatively lower (90-100 rpm) cadences I use for time trialing.
    duh!

    Teach me to post and work at the same time..

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Orange Park, FL
    My Bikes
    Ever changing..as of 2-24-09: 2003 Giant TCR Team Once, Sampson titanium, 1992 Paramount Series 3, 2003 Cervelo P3, 70s Raleigh Record fixed gear, 70s Fuji SL-12 commuter, mid 90s Klein MTB. Plus two or three frames lurking, plus 5 wife/kids rides
    Posts
    1,340
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by elgalad View Post
    Errr, you've got that backwards. If you go to a shorter crank length, you have to raise your seat because the pedal is closer to your body at the bottom of the pedal stroke.
    You're correct, you can raise your seat a tiny bit with shorter cranks. But...the short cranks mean your leg doesn't come up quite as high at the top of the pedal stroke, and thus your hip angle stays a bit more open. The limiter for most people is that "crunch" at the top of the pedal stroke.

    I know Jens, one of the regular TT posters on Slowtwitch, has made some mention of trying "circus cranks" (like 160s) for this reason. I dunno, but I'm on 175s on mine and thinking about switching to shorter.
    Kendall Frederick

    Orange Park, FL

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •