Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > "The 33"-Road Bike Racing
Reload this Page >

HRM training: Threshold zone upper limit?

Search
Notices
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

HRM training: Threshold zone upper limit?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-08, 02:55 PM
  #1  
molasses in winter slow
Thread Starter
 
bravo106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 349

Bikes: '06 Serotta Nove, '04 Mondonico Futura Leggero, '08 Haro Mary SS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
HRM training: Threshold zone upper limit?

Considering a LT of 165 bpm, I've seen various training programs with the top end of Zone 4 - threshold - anywhere from 164 - 173. Most of the other zones, regardless of the program, are within a few beats of each other. But the top of zone 4 has the largest variance. On one end, threshold is right at or a hair below my actual threshold. On the other end, it's 8 beats higher (165 * 105%), which would mean (wouldn't it?) that I'm well into anaerobic.

I'm incorporating some threshold intervals into my training now, & I'd like some guidance as to where I should be. Unfortunately, as of yet, I don't have access to power training, so HRM it is.

P.S. I'm going off of a VO2max test for my LT # (the same test which gave me a VO2max value of 70.12 , so for someone 48 y.o. I'm a little skeptical), although on Friel's 30/20 minute TT, I averaged 171, so even my LT is up in the air.
bravo106 is offline  
Old 02-05-08, 07:18 PM
  #2  
My idea of fun
 
kensuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 9,920

Bikes: '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '02 Kona Lavadome, '07 Giant TCR Advanced, '07 Karate Monkey

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times in 36 Posts
Assuming that your LT test was done in a lab, you should have been given your HR zones by the techs.
kensuf is offline  
Old 02-05-08, 10:14 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
my lt is around 172, with my zone four falling right on it. However, other people I know have different zones set up, so that might be a source of confusion. Some people have 3 zones until they go anaerobic, while some have 4. the one you saw with the top of your zone 4 at lt, is probably designed with two of the lower zones combined into one (say tempo), giving you 3 below and one above, instead of the (i believe) more common 4 below and one above.
bikeM3987 is offline  
Old 02-05-08, 10:25 PM
  #4  
Slow'n'Aero
 
DrWJODonnell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Driving the pace in the crosswind
Posts: 2,599
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Look at Friel's training bible. Go to the LTHR chart. Look up your LTHR on the chart. You will then have your HR zones.

That is all.
DrWJODonnell is offline  
Old 02-05-08, 10:39 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Stallionforce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,372

Bikes: 05 Norco CRR Team Carbon Dura Ace, 06 Cervelo P2C TT Dura Ace, 88 Olmo Steelie w. Campy Mirage, Cypress CX w. 105

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Then it's not a matter of zones, once you find them. You've got to find your sweet spot in that LTHR range. I like to do block training, and I find this method particularly effective if I am doing my 2x20 intervals at about 92% FTP. At this 'sweet spot' HR, I can just recover between sessions, and therefore 'block' them, and achieve the benefit of supercompensation. But then we're talkin' FTP. Anyway, my LTHR is 172 and I will do my threshold work right around 158-160 bpm. Also take into consideration that your HR will drop on successive days of hard training, and due to other factors as well. HR training is still very effective; and I don't consider power training to be effective by itself. You still need to monitor HR. The most effective training is done with both power and HR.
Stallionforce is offline  
Old 02-06-08, 04:41 AM
  #6  
bzzzz
 
fuzzthebee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 360
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bravo106
Considering a LT of 165 bpm, I've seen various training programs with the top end of Zone 4 - threshold - anywhere from 164 - 173. Most of the other zones, regardless of the program, are within a few beats of each other. But the top of zone 4 has the largest variance. On one end, threshold is right at or a hair below my actual threshold. On the other end, it's 8 beats higher (165 * 105%), which would mean (wouldn't it?) that I'm well into anaerobic.

I'm incorporating some threshold intervals into my training now, & I'd like some guidance as to where I should be. Unfortunately, as of yet, I don't have access to power training, so HRM it is.

P.S. I'm going off of a VO2max test for my LT # (the same test which gave me a VO2max value of 70.12 , so for someone 48 y.o. I'm a little skeptical), although on Friel's 30/20 minute TT, I averaged 171, so even my LT is up in the air.
Also, keep in mind that a well paced (w/power meter) threshold interval will see your hear rate gradually rise during the 20 minutes. My LTHR is ~167, yet on my 20' intervals, it will start out around 160 for the first couple of minutes, and by the end I will hit around 171.
fuzzthebee is offline  
Old 02-06-08, 07:38 AM
  #7  
molasses in winter slow
Thread Starter
 
bravo106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 349

Bikes: '06 Serotta Nove, '04 Mondonico Futura Leggero, '08 Haro Mary SS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kensuf
Assuming that your LT test was done in a lab, you should have been given your HR zones by the techs.

Unfortunately, they didn't. Well, they did, but there was a glitch in the software that only gave me 2 zones ... 1 up to 165, the other above. That's another reason why I'm a little skeptical of the results. They said I could come back for a retest once everything was all sorted out, but I haven't gotten around to it yet.

And, DrWJO, I used to go by Friel exclusively. But his threshold zone(s) are cause for confusion. With 165 in bold, i.e., LT, the zone goes up to 168. IIRC, he also divides threshold into 2 zones, 4a & 4b (what's he call them, sub-threshold & supra-threshold, or something like that?). Which brings me back to my question, would my threshold top out at 165, 168, or the top of 4b, which is higher still? Or am I splittin' hairs?

Last night I did a set of 2x8 intervals, hitting 167 on the 1st and 172 on the 2nd towards the end of each interval.
bravo106 is offline  
Old 02-06-08, 07:49 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Silverdale, WA
Posts: 565

Bikes: 2004 Cannondale R600

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Aren't Friel's zones based on percentages of your LTHR?
https://www.martygaal.com/words/zones.html

So absolute numbers don't matter, but rather the percentage of your own LTHR.
calhoun1 is offline  
Old 02-06-08, 07:58 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,840
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You're splitting hairs. Use 171 as your LTHR and set your zones from there. You obtaining the 171 from real world conditions, which is where you'll be doing your training. The more "lab tests" I've done, and the more I hear/read about those that others have done, the more of a waste I think they are.

For threshold intervals, just do them at the maximum intensity you can maintain using perceived exertion and check your HR as a guage to keep from starting too hard. If you find 20' is too long to maintain or are having difficulty pacing such a longer effort, follow a "build up" progression such as starting out by doing something like a 4x6', then next week go to 3x8, 3x10, 2x15, 2x20, etc.
MDcatV is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.