Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Folsom, CA
    Posts
    145
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    flat technical crits & power numbers.

    I am just curious what kind of power numbers (AP & NP) you guys are putting up in flat technical crits. I have done two pretty flat & technical crits that have the pace shooting all over the place. I am curious what most guys out there are puting out. I am a Cat 4 and it seems like I am having to throw down more power than I thought I would have to. Please list your AP, NP & Category.

    I am not trolling or looking to get into any pissing contests. Just looking for numbers to compare to out there.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Silverdale, WA
    My Bikes
    2004 Cannondale R600
    Posts
    564
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It will depend. Weight of the person makes a difference. A 130lb rider will need to put out less power due to aerodynamics than a 190lb rider.

    So you would need weight as well...

    But if you are able to hang on, what does it matter?
    Cynical - The only way to live

    Cat4-O-Meter 40%

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    2,903
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by USCswimming View Post
    II am a Cat 4 and it seems like I am having to throw down more power than I thought I would have to.
    It seems the only question worth asking (though no one who hasn't seen you race can answer it) is whether you're wasting energy where you don't have to. Outside of that, the answer is whatever your power meter shows you had to do to in those particular races is what you had to do.

  4. #4
    slow up hills kudude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    My Bikes
    Giant TCR, Redline CX, Ritchey Breakaway, Spec S-works epic
    Posts
    4,928
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by calhoun1 View Post
    It will depend. Weight of the person makes a difference. A 130lb rider will need to put out less power due to aerodynamics than a 190lb rider.

    So you would need weight as well...

    But if you are able to hang on, what does it matter?
    I'd guess the issue has less to do with aerodynamics than it does accelerating weight. Coming out of a slow corner at 15 and then having to get on it up to 26-28 to get back in the field takes a lot of power, and very little comes from wind resistance.
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_tom View Post
    Cycling isn't a sport. It's more like a really, really expensive eating disorder.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    2,903
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kudude View Post
    Coming out of a slow corner at 15 and then having to get on it up to 26-28 to get back in the field takes a lot of power, and very little comes from wind resistance.
    You might want to check your work. Using analyticcycling.com and the most optimistic assumptions, aero drag eats up more than 50% of the total rider power. I don't consider that very little.

  6. #6
    Burning Matches. ElJamoquio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Le Champion SL, Cervelo P2SL
    Posts
    9,660
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by asgelle View Post
    You might want to check your work. Using analyticcycling.com and the most optimistic assumptions, aero drag eats up more than 50% of the total rider power. I don't consider that very little.
    I was thinking the same thing;but in the middle of the pack the aero drag *is* minimized.

    But a flat technical crit is where it really pays to be in the front of the pack, yo-yo-ing the poor slobs at the back.
    Reacting is mind candy; it requires no thought. Thinking is tedious.

    Bikeforums 'Group Buy': Kinlin Rims, Sapim/DT Spokes, Formula/Bitex Hubs


    "The only good race pace is suicide pace, and today looks like a good day to die."
    -Steve Prefontaine

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    2,903
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ElJamoquio View Post
    I was thinking the same thing;but in the middle of the pack the aero drag *is* minimized.

    But a flat technical crit is where it really pays to be in the front of the pack, yo-yo-ing the poor slobs at the back.
    Minimized, but not eliminated. And as you know even a 10% change in power around threshold can have a big impact. So over the course of a race, the rider near the front riding a steady pace around threshold can stay relatively easily, but move the rider back and require ~10% more power to accelerate after the yo-yo'ing and after a few corners, she'll be gone.

  8. #8
    Making a kilometer blurry waterrockets's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin (near TX)
    My Bikes
    rkwaki's porn collection
    Posts
    25,595
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think your power profile has something to do with it too. I know you to be more of a sprinter trending towards all-rounder from our previous conversations. If you're like me, you spike pretty high coming out of corners and during surges just to keep the draft close or move up a bit, and it hurts us less than it does other guys spiking to the same W/kg, eliminates the gap in front of us, and exaggerates the gap behind us.

    I've been coming out of really sharp corners with a 3-bike gap behind me, but feeling quite comfortable.

    I don't have any crit data yet, unfortunately. I think it will be May before I have any There's a weekly crit, but I coach soccer practice that night...

  9. #9
    A Member kukusz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    855
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by waterrockets View Post
    I've been coming out of really sharp corners with a 3-bike gap behind me, but feeling quite comfortable.
    I think that also has a lot to do with bike handling. I'm just getting the feel for fast cornering, and people regularly get a couple of bike lengths on me coming out of corners just based on pure technical skills.

  10. #10
    A Member kukusz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    855
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by USCswimming View Post
    I am just curious what kind of power numbers (AP & NP).
    Cat 5 race, 30 minute crit, 4 man break from lap 3. AP 258, NP 286, 24.8 mph.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Folsom, CA
    Posts
    145
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ElJamoquio View Post
    I was thinking the same thing;but in the middle of the pack the aero drag *is* minimized.

    But a flat technical crit is where it really pays to be in the front of the pack, yo-yo-ing the poor slobs at the back.

    Not being near the front and suffering from the accordian effect is what put the hurt on me today. I was riding, for the lack of better words, "like a little beeotch". My training hasn't led me into any really quick, hard bursts yet and those were a little more painful today. Atleast I get back into speedwork after another week. I was pretty suprised to see such a huge difference in AP & NP. Well anyway, here were the numbers:

    Land Park Crit:
    Duration: 37:20
    Work: 632 kJ
    TSS: 61.9 (intensity factor 0.997)
    Norm Power: 329
    VI: 1.17
    Distance: 15.866 mi
    Min Max Avg
    Power: 0 1217 282 watts
    Heart rate: 91 194 172 bpm
    Cadence: 41 163 97 rpm
    Speed: 6 34.1 25.5 mph

  12. #12
    Making a kilometer blurry waterrockets's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin (near TX)
    My Bikes
    rkwaki's porn collection
    Posts
    25,595
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, seeing those numbers, I do think a lot of it has to do with your profile, as well as your pack position. If you weren't near the front, your surges were harder.

    I was involved in some attacks and chasing, as well as some sharp hills in this race, but it was a road race and reflects a greater difference between NP and AP (higher VI):

    Duration: 1:42:11
    Work: 1609 kJ
    TSS: 148.2 (intensity factor 0.933)
    Norm Power: 322
    VI: 1.23
    Distance: 39.137 mi
    Min Max Avg
    Power: 0 1434 262 watts
    Cadence: 33 141 93 rpm
    Speed: 3 49.2 23.0 mph

  13. #13
    Writin' stuff ZeCanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    3,779
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Of course weight is going to scew numbers, but even someone at the same weight and aerodynamic drag as you may do upwards of 20-30w difference just based on pack riding skills.
    Velo Magazine/VeloNews.com tech guy get in touch or hit me on the tweeter @CaleyFretz

  14. #14
    getting dropped merckx89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    pasadena ca
    My Bikes
    cannondale super six, KHS 100 fixed, P3
    Posts
    917
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Pack position is definitely very important. I've done races where I finished with 320 average (72Kg), and someone else I know was at like 230 at near the same weight hiding in the pack. Definitely makes a difference.
    Cat 1 o-meter: cowering in fear

  15. #15
    bzzzz fuzzthebee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    360
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by merckx89 View Post
    Pack position is definitely very important. I've done races where I finished with 320 average (72Kg), and someone else I know was at like 230 at near the same weight hiding in the pack. Definitely makes a difference.
    I have a file from a race last May. The course was 1.6 km, with two hair-pin corners. It was the day after a frustrating 96 km road race. I decided to ride "in anger" at the front to keep the pace high and discourage attacks. My teamate took the win in the end.

    Duration: 50:11
    Work: 960 kJ
    TSS: 83.6 (intensity factor 1.0)
    Norm Power: 345
    VI: 1.08
    Distance: 30.7 km
    Min Max Avg
    Power: 0 1378 319 watts
    Heart rate: n/a
    Cadence: 32 141 89 rpm
    Speed: 5.3 50.8 36.7 km/h

    My NP was right at FTP, with a lower VI, due to riding mostly at the front. This was in the S3 category, probably similar to Cat 4.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •