Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30
  1. #1
    Mr. Dopolina Bob Dopolina's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Taiwan
    My Bikes
    KUUPAS, Simpson VR
    Posts
    9,333
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    The real poop on Ergomo.

    OK. I am an email away from dropping some coin on an Ergomo set-up (Pro with crankset). I needed some new hardware and ruled out PT and can't get a deal on SRM so it's Ergomo or nothing right now.

    I would be getting the system at a great price and know I would get support so this is not an issue. My concern is about the reliability of the product itself. I live in the tropics so water is an issue. I know they have redone their computer and it has been improved.

    Any advice, suggestions or anecdotal experiences from OWNERS of Ergomo systems would be greatly appreciated.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,918
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Pedal with one leg..... Egromo only measures one side
    Please remember that all statements unless quoted, are strictly my opinion of what happened. That there are as many opinions as there are spectators attending. I just choose to publish mine on this forum. And would NEVER intend to purposely hurt or discredit any other cyclist.... With that said... HTFU!

  3. #3
    Mr. Dopolina Bob Dopolina's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Taiwan
    My Bikes
    KUUPAS, Simpson VR
    Posts
    9,333
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wfrogge View Post
    Pedal with one leg..... Egromo only measures one side
    Aren't the strain gauges on the SRM on the crank side? Isn't that one side?

    If you are measuring the torsion on the axle then don't both legs apply torque to the BB axle?

    Am I misunderstanding something?

  4. #4
    Banned. El Diablo Rojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    ATX, Ex So Cal
    My Bikes
    Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu
    Posts
    11,058
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina View Post
    OK. I am an email away from dropping some coin on an Ergomo set-up (Pro with crankset). I needed some new hardware and ruled out PT and can't get a deal on SRM so it's Ergomo or nothing right now.

    I would be getting the system at a great price and know I would get support so this is not an issue. My concern is about the reliability of the product itself. I live in the tropics so water is an issue. I know they have redone their computer and it has been improved.

    Any advice, suggestions or anecdotal experiences from OWNERS of Ergomo systems would be greatly appreciated.
    I've got three and have had little trouble with them. I've also had PT's and they are no more or less problematic than the PT's. From what I've learned from SRM owners they about the same in the user issues.

    Now here are the pro's and cons of owning an ergomo.

    Pro's: accuracy (ignore the post about pedaling with one leg he knows not of what he speaks) i've tested this thing back to back with SRM's and it's within +/- 5w. Cost, compared to an SRM it's a pretty good deal. Altitude and gradient, you don't get that with an SRM.

    Cons: Well it's really a ***** to move from one bike to the next. You can't use and external bearing BB with one. The new distributer Fit Multisport has not returned any phone calls or emails I've sent them. However ergomo Germany has been very helpful.


    Personally I like it much more than my PT and for the money it's a better buy than an SRM.

  5. #5
    wavylines
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bull City
    Posts
    546
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by El Diablo Rojo View Post
    Pro's: accuracy
    The literature doesn't agree, or at least, gives very mixed reviews. Even if we accept that the Ergomo is properly installed and accurately measuring torque in the bottom bracket, it still assumes that the ratio of power between the left and right legs is constant. Studies show that, in fact, that ratio varies with intensity, fatigue and riding position.
    At least I offer my own disaster.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,918
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina View Post
    Aren't the strain gauges on the SRM on the crank side? Isn't that one side?

    If you are measuring the torsion on the axle then don't both legs apply torque to the BB axle?

    Am I misunderstanding something?

    Pretty sure the SRM does not measure just one leg like the Ergomo and since all things are not equal (for our legs) left leg power x 2 may give odd results though I admit it might not be an issue.

    Another con to using Egromo is you are limited to the cranks you can use.
    Please remember that all statements unless quoted, are strictly my opinion of what happened. That there are as many opinions as there are spectators attending. I just choose to publish mine on this forum. And would NEVER intend to purposely hurt or discredit any other cyclist.... With that said... HTFU!

  7. #7
    wavylines
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bull City
    Posts
    546
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina View Post
    Aren't the strain gauges on the SRM on the crank side? Isn't that one side?

    If you are measuring the torsion on the axle then don't both legs apply torque to the BB axle?

    Am I misunderstanding something?
    SRMs really measure torque in the chain. Both legs contribute to that. Ergomos only measure torque from the left side and assume that total torque is twice that.
    At least I offer my own disaster.

  8. #8
    Banned. El Diablo Rojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    ATX, Ex So Cal
    My Bikes
    Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu
    Posts
    11,058
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by curveship View Post
    The literature doesn't agree, or at least, gives very mixed reviews. Even if we accept that the Ergomo is properly installed and accurately measuring torque in the bottom bracket, it still assumes that the ratio of power between the left and right legs is constant. Studies show that, in fact, that ratio varies with intensity, fatigue and riding position.
    Then you are misunderstanding how the ergomo interpolates the data. I had a Power Tap Pro for two years, looking at the data from the PT and the ergomo I've found no differences. I've done tests with both the PT and the ergomo on the bike and the data within a few watts of being the same. I've also done back to back tests with SRM's and egromos and found the same results. Racer X has had both (ergomo and SRM) and he has had the same results.

  9. #9
    Certifiable Bike "Expert"
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,631
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by curveship View Post
    SRMs really measure torque in the chain.
    More accurately, torque through the spider.

    Actually, elongation due to bending of the arms of the spider.



    What about something from Quarq instead of the Ergomo?
    I don't even use the offensive term "Fred." -- Sheldon "All Cyclists Are My Friends" Brown (1944-2008)

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    525
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    More reading for you but you may help w your decision...

    http://www.cyclingforums.com/t443031.html
    http://www.cyclingforums.com/t422842.html

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,918
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wouldnt BB flex account for some erroneous data issues when using it?
    Please remember that all statements unless quoted, are strictly my opinion of what happened. That there are as many opinions as there are spectators attending. I just choose to publish mine on this forum. And would NEVER intend to purposely hurt or discredit any other cyclist.... With that said... HTFU!

  12. #12
    Race to train jrennie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    suffering on the back
    Posts
    3,115
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Shouldn't since the ergomo is optical and not strain measuring device.

    I think EDR and RacerEx can give you non-bias reviews since they have both used multiple power meters. From what I have read the ergomo accuracy is very sensitive to proper installation. As far as the device measuring only one leg, well it really depends on what you are trying to achieve. If you want to directly measure your readings to your friend PT or SRM it may be off but if you are using it to log and train then it doesn't matter if you device read 100w high as long as it is consistent in that reading.

    My only gripe with the ergomo is the ugly head unit.

  13. #13
    Banned. El Diablo Rojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    ATX, Ex So Cal
    My Bikes
    Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu
    Posts
    11,058
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jrennie View Post
    Shouldn't since the ergomo is optical and not strain measuring device.

    I think EDR and RacerEx can give you non-bias reviews since they have both used multiple power meters. From what I have read the ergomo accuracy is very sensitive to proper installation. As far as the device measuring only one leg, well it really depends on what you are trying to achieve. If you want to directly measure your readings to your friend PT or SRM it may be off but if you are using it to log and train then it doesn't matter if you device read 100w high as long as it is consistent in that reading.

    My only gripe with the ergomo is the ugly head unit.
    This is the most important thing, as long as your data is repeatable then that is all that matters. FWIW I did like my PT I just like my ergomo better.

  14. #14
    wavylines
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bull City
    Posts
    546
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by El Diablo Rojo View Post
    Then you are misunderstanding how the ergomo interpolates the data.
    With all due respect, I'm not. The Ergomo makes an assumption about physiology: that the power differential b/w right and left legs stays constant. Studies say otherwise.

    Check out the second link in LT Intolerant's post. There's also some stuff on biketechreview.com, but Kraig just redid the forum and I can't find the links. I'll post back if I can round them up.
    At least I offer my own disaster.

  15. #15
    Resident Alien Racer Ex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Let me check.
    My Bikes
    Of course.
    Posts
    11,287
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by curveship View Post
    With all due respect, I'm not.
    The due diligence is helpful, but seems heavily biased. For the record though, Ride magazine did a comparative review over several issues. They found it read higher in the higher (800+) wattages than the SRM or PT if memory serves.

    I would ask if you've owned one? OP's not asking for a librarian or a human Goggle, but rather first hand user data, which you can't provide if you haven't lived with the units.

    I did for nearly two years.

    I no longer own one, I don't have any emotional attachment or financial interest. Here's my opinion:

    I liked the computer on the Ergomo better than anything I've seen (I did paint it black though). TSS/IF, altitude, gradient, and cumulative feet climbed in an easy to use interface with big numbers for us elderly folks. I never had a weatherproofing problem but I never tested it as harshly as I have my SRM's. That said it saw sub zero and 100 plus temps, some water, snow and sleet. Never had an issue.

    While absolute accuracy might be better with other units, compared to my SRM's I didn't see any wide discrepancies. Very good relative consistency, which is what you need in a meter that you'll be using as a training device. The one leg issue didn't manifest itself in any way, and given that I'm heavily left handed and footed, I'm not a bad test pilot.

    The one thing to remember is that if you pedal backwards, you can make it read 8000 watts or so. Great for impressing BFer's, but it does throw your CP numbers off a bit.

    It's also very light and gives you a choice of cranksets.

    Installation is critical though. I do 99% of my own work, so I took time to make sure it was installed really well, and to the exact specs and orientation called for. A number of the problems people have had are a direct result of improper installation.

    I ended up selling the units because I dropped the big bucks on a Dura style SRM (and later an FSA unit). I've got a number of bikes and the external BB bearing setup allows me to swap the SRM unit quickly and easily. I've got several bikes wired up and ready to go, something the Ergomo couldn't do.

    Given my experience and needs I'd go with the Ergomo over any other powermeter except the SRM, as long as you are confident you can get it serviced. I had zero issues with either of my units.
    Last edited by Racer Ex; 03-20-08 at 04:19 PM.

  16. #16
    Mr. Dopolina Bob Dopolina's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Taiwan
    My Bikes
    KUUPAS, Simpson VR
    Posts
    9,333
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks all for the input and the links. Big help.

    Service won't be an issue as I am dealing with the Big Cheese from Germany (industry connection).

    I run a Service Center, which is fully equipped, so I have the tools and the skill to install the unit correctly (at least I hope I do!).

    +/- 5w is no biggie as long as it is consistent.

  17. #17
    Carpe Diem bdcheung's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    MABRA
    My Bikes
    2007 CAAD9; 2008 Giant Bowery; 2008 Surly Crosscheck
    Posts
    13,130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'll echo RacerEx's comments 100%, sans the fact that I still own my Ergomo.

    Pro Tip: I ended up putting teflon tape on the threads of my unit because the BB started squeaking.
    "When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
    ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!

  18. #18
    100 kW :) ifox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    My Bikes
    '08 Specialized Tarmac SL2
    Posts
    401
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What about intervals (laps) feature on Ergomo? I read somewhere that it's not available on Ergomo and intervals should be separated from each other using software.
    Cat-O-Meter: where do I get mine?

  19. #19
    Carpe Diem bdcheung's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    MABRA
    My Bikes
    2007 CAAD9; 2008 Giant Bowery; 2008 Surly Crosscheck
    Posts
    13,130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Intervals are 100% present on the Ergomo headunit.

    Mid-ride, hold down the bottom button for a couple seconds and it puts you in interval mode. Top button starts the interval, press again and it stops the interval, press again and it moves to the next interval.

    The best thing is that in between intervals, you can use the bottom button to review average power/cadence/HR/speed from previous intervals.
    "When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
    ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!

  20. #20
    Burning Matches. ElJamoquio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Le Champion SL, Cervelo P2SL
    Posts
    9,663
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bdcheung View Post
    The best thing is that in between intervals, you can use the bottom button to review average power/cadence/HR/speed from previous intervals.
    You mean you review them the same way you can on a Powertap?
    Reacting is mind candy; it requires no thought. Thinking is tedious.

    Bikeforums 'Group Buy': Kinlin Rims, Sapim/DT Spokes, Formula/Bitex Hubs


    "The only good race pace is suicide pace, and today looks like a good day to die."
    -Steve Prefontaine

  21. #21
    Quarq shill cslone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    My Bikes
    08 Felt F4, 05 Fuji Team SL, 08 Planet X Stealth, 10 Kona Jake the Snake, 03 Giant OCR flat bar.
    Posts
    3,962
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by El Diablo Rojo View Post
    Then you are misunderstanding how the ergomo interpolates the data. I had a Power Tap Pro for two years, looking at the data from the PT and the ergomo I've found no differences. I've done tests with both the PT and the ergomo on the bike and the data within a few watts of being the same. I've also done back to back tests with SRM's and egromos and found the same results. Racer X has had both (ergomo and SRM) and he has had the same results.
    No, it really does just double the power measured by the left leg. The bb doesn't twist on the right side, so it has to make the assumption that your right leg is putting out the same power as the left. Again, probably fine for repeatability, but can be off due to leg imbalances.
    Although it would be nice to be able to use the race wheels without buying a new hub, a la PT.


    http://www.saris.com/scienceofpower/...tionErgomo.pdf
    FS: Fuji SL1 frameset, 55.5cm toptube, excellent condition.

  22. #22
    Carpe Diem bdcheung's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    MABRA
    My Bikes
    2007 CAAD9; 2008 Giant Bowery; 2008 Surly Crosscheck
    Posts
    13,130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ElJamoquio View Post
    You mean you review them the same way you can on a Powertap?
    In terms of basic functionality, yes, both units display data from previous intervals in the same way.

    The Ergomo, on the other hand, allows you to exit "Interval Mode". The Powertap, by my experience, doesn't. Once you start an interval, you can't stop. You also can't stop one interval without immediately starting the next (i.e. on the PT, when you hold down both buttons to stop Interval1, Interval2 starts immediately). With the Ergomo, you can stop Interval1, recover, then start Interval2 at a later time.
    "When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
    ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!

  23. #23
    Banned. El Diablo Rojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    ATX, Ex So Cal
    My Bikes
    Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu
    Posts
    11,058
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cslone View Post
    No, it really does just double the power measured by the left leg. The bb doesn't twist on the right side, so it has to make the assumption that your right leg is putting out the same power as the left. Again, probably fine for repeatability, but can be off due to leg imbalances.
    Although it would be nice to be able to use the race wheels without buying a new hub, a la PT.


    http://www.saris.com/scienceofpower/...tionErgomo.pdf
    I understand how the ergo works, but the way that interprilates the data is more complex than just doubling the watts. That's why you do an offset prior to each ride.

    I've done one legged drills and the watts are consistent on both legs. I had a PT wireless and did a complete workout with both the PT and ergomo attached. The two units were within +/- 5w. I really think everyone is making way too much out of the 'one side' thing.

  24. #24
    Burning Matches. ElJamoquio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Le Champion SL, Cervelo P2SL
    Posts
    9,663
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bdcheung View Post
    The Ergomo, on the other hand, allows you to exit "Interval Mode". The Powertap, by my experience, doesn't. Once you start an interval, you can't stop. You also can't stop one interval without immediately starting the next (i.e. on the PT, when you hold down both buttons to stop Interval1, Interval2 starts immediately). With the Ergomo, you can stop Interval1, recover, then start Interval2 at a later time.
    How is this a benefit?
    Reacting is mind candy; it requires no thought. Thinking is tedious.

    Bikeforums 'Group Buy': Kinlin Rims, Sapim/DT Spokes, Formula/Bitex Hubs


    "The only good race pace is suicide pace, and today looks like a good day to die."
    -Steve Prefontaine

  25. #25
    Killing Rabbits
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,685
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ElJamoquio View Post
    How is this a benefit?
    +1

    If anything this is a benefit as the recovery interval should be measured.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •