Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-04-09, 11:41 AM   #276
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
Posts: 26,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by umd View Post
It won't show if it's too low. Mine took a while to get high enough to get onto the chart.
I don't see that. I have a ride that's just a commute home from soccer practice with my 7 year old son. Peak 1' was 119W, and it shows up in the ranges on the left.
waterrockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 11:49 AM   #277
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Posts: 28,387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterrockets View Post
I don't see that. I have a ride that's just a commute home from soccer practice with my 7 year old son. Peak 1' was 119W, and it shows up in the ranges on the left.
Are we talking about the ranges or the power profile (i.e. the e-wang)? The bottom of the 1' on the profile is 4.67 for a woman (5.64 for a man). If we assume, say 120lbs (~54.5kg) then that is 254W. You can go to the "Summary" at the top of the "Athlete Home" tab and see what your Peak 1'w is for each week.
umd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 12:02 PM   #278
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
Posts: 26,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by umd View Post
Are we talking about the ranges or the power profile (i.e. the e-wang)? The bottom of the 1' on the profile is 4.67 for a woman (5.64 for a man). If we assume, say 120lbs (~54.5kg) then that is 254W. You can go to the "Summary" at the top of the "Athlete Home" tab and see what your Peak 1'w is for each week.
Yep, I misread her original question, this is for the power profile.

Wolfpack, add peak 1' power to a chart, expressed in W/kg, and see if your highest one is high enough to make it into the profile. Have you tested 1' power?
waterrockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 12:02 PM   #279
ridethecliche
Village Idiot
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bahstaaaaan
Bikes:
Posts: 20,241
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
(I still think that this thread should be a sticky)
ridethecliche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 12:06 PM   #280
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Posts: 28,387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
So, um, what would you call the e-wang for women?
umd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 12:11 PM   #281
tharrel1
Don't Tase Me Bro!
 
tharrel1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Bikes:
Posts: 114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by umd View Post
So, um, what would you call the e-wang for women?
e-tang?
tharrel1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 12:21 PM   #282
wolfpack 
Rawwrrrrrrrrr!
 
wolfpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clayton, NC
Bikes: 2009 Specialized Ruby Sworks SL w/SRAM Red; 2006 Fuji Team RC; 2008 Felt F1x; 1980's Lotus Excelle; Mangusta FG/SS; Rossin (yet to be built up)
Posts: 2,728
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterrockets View Post
Yep, I misread her original question, this is for the power profile.

Wolfpack, add peak 1' power to a chart, expressed in W/kg, and see if your highest one is high enough to make it into the profile. Have you tested 1' power?
ok, i'll try that at home. i've not really ever tested for 1' power. thx.

e-tang.
__________________
wolfpackcycles
skiffrun: Enjoy the ride. Ride for the enjoyment.
wolfpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 12:47 PM   #283
ridethecliche
Village Idiot
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bahstaaaaan
Bikes:
Posts: 20,241
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tharrel1 View Post
e-tang?
Lmfao!
ridethecliche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 03:49 PM   #284
Hocam
Ho-Jahm
 
Hocam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester, NH
Bikes:
Posts: 4,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
So apparently when you buy a WKO+ CD you have an old version and the registration key you get from their website won't work unless you download the program from their website. Wish someone had told me. So that's solved.

Updated the firmware to 4.07, hopefully that solves my other problem.

Also, I didn't lose the workout file!!!!

I did a 1 hour workout and got a NP of 252 for a IF of 1.21

Guess that 20 minute test on the rollers was a little low....

Last edited by Hocam; 03-04-09 at 03:53 PM.
Hocam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 04:00 PM   #285
ridethecliche
Village Idiot
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bahstaaaaan
Bikes:
Posts: 20,241
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hocam View Post
So apparently when you buy a WKO+ CD you have an old version and the registration key you get from their website won't work unless you download the program from their website. Wish someone had told me. So that's solved.

Updated the firmware to 4.07, hopefully that solves my other problem.

Also, I didn't lose the workout file!!!!

I did a 1 hour workout and got a NP of 252 for a IF of 1.21

Guess that 20 minute test on the rollers was a little low....
Nice!

I'd say your FTP is around 240ish based on the 1hr workout, but it depends on how hard you were going. was it all out?
ridethecliche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 04:04 PM   #286
Hocam
Ho-Jahm
 
Hocam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester, NH
Bikes:
Posts: 4,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Definitely not all out, it was a sprint workout so there was a lot of recovery going on. I did eight 40 second sprints and a couple 2-4 minute efforts with some zone 2/3 thrown around. The legs were pretty kicked after that but they weren't fresh to start with either.

I'll set it at 245 for now and continue to gather data.

One interesting thing is on the rollers my average cadence was 110 rpm, this was a much more reasonable 87 (excluding 0's).
Hocam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 04:23 PM   #287
mattm
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Bikes:
Posts: 13,908
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 223 Post(s)
so here's a Q: is the FT column on the e-wang/e-tang (e-thang?) chart calculated from Avg 20-min power, as opposed to Normalized Power?

seems like it is, and i wonder why.
__________________
cat 1.

blog
mattm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 04:33 PM   #288
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
Posts: 26,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
It's FT is 60 minute mean-maximal power (best average)
waterrockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 04:57 PM   #289
mattm
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Bikes:
Posts: 13,908
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 223 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterrockets View Post
It's FT is 60 minute mean-maximal power (best average)
ah, so it's 60min MM, ok.

i guess i mostly wonder because my FT e-thang would be a bit bigger if i go by 1 hr NP instead. but i'll use the metric they've defined, instead of the one that makes me "look" the best on paper.
__________________
cat 1.

blog
mattm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 05:21 PM   #290
challaday
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Just this side of insanity.
Bikes: Too many
Posts: 574
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've had my powertap for just a few months now. I've done the various protocol testing, and used it on 99% of my rides since getting it. When I first did the testing, my power profile using Coggan's verbage was an "inverted v" which peaked at the 5 minute level and came back down dramatically for my 20 minute.

I've been training using the program in the Appendix of the Allen and Coggan book for 12 weeks now, and I have seen an improvement in my overall power numbers of about 8-10%. However, even though the workouts are designed to push FTP, my overall inverted V pattern hasn't changed at all. In other words, my 5 second, 1 minute, 5 minute, and 20 minute w/kg values all went up about 8-10% so they are the same relative to one another.

If I want to really focus on FTP, what workouts should I be doing? Just focusing on 2x20 at 95% of FTP?
challaday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 05:29 PM   #291
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Posts: 28,387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by challaday View Post
I've had my powertap for just a few months now. I've done the various protocol testing, and used it on 99% of my rides since getting it. When I first did the testing, my power profile using Coggan's verbage was an "inverted v" which peaked at the 5 minute level and came back down dramatically for my 20 minute.

I've been training using the program in the Appendix of the Allen and Coggan book for 12 weeks now, and I have seen an improvement in my overall power numbers of about 8-10%. However, even though the workouts are designed to push FTP, my overall inverted V pattern hasn't changed at all. In other words, my 5 second, 1 minute, 5 minute, and 20 minute w/kg values all went up about 8-10% so they are the same relative to one another.

If I want to really focus on FTP, what workouts should I be doing? Just focusing on 2x20 at 95% of FTP?
Embrace your profile. I've seen mine flatten a bit but I still have my 5m much higher than the rest, just grazing "excellent" while my 1m is nearly (but not quite) "very good", my FT is "good" and my 5s is barely "moderate"
umd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 05:37 PM   #292
mattm
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Bikes:
Posts: 13,908
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 223 Post(s)
another Q: if i got an IF of .98 on a sprited 1-hour commute, is that a sign i should re-test my FT?

seems like that's way too high of an IF just for a commute. (and i wasn't super-wasted at the end, just a little tired)
__________________
cat 1.

blog
mattm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 05:42 PM   #293
Hocam
Ho-Jahm
 
Hocam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester, NH
Bikes:
Posts: 4,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I have a higher 5 minute and 20 minute than 1" and 5 second by about 5 notches but I've never really trained specifically for sprinting, so I'm giving it a go for 4 weeks and seeing how I respond. Then I'll start racing crit's and see how I'm doing.
Hocam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 05:55 PM   #294
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Posts: 28,387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattm View Post
another Q: if i got an IF of .98 on a sprited 1-hour commute, is that a sign i should re-test my FT?

seems like that's way too high of an IF just for a commute. (and i wasn't super-wasted at the end, just a little tired)
What was the VI?
umd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 06:02 PM   #295
mattm
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Bikes:
Posts: 13,908
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 223 Post(s)
VI was 1.14 (NP = 261, AP = 228)

But from looking at the actual workout (as opposed to the "TSS & IF Last 28 Days" chart), the IF for that ride is actually .915... how does it come up with the IF for the graph on the home page?

edit: my threshold is set to 285w, so the .915 IF seems correct. so where did .98 come from?!
__________________
cat 1.

blog
mattm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-09, 08:28 PM   #296
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Posts: 28,387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The TSS & IF chart shows you the average over all rides for the day... did you have more than one ride?
umd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-09, 12:31 PM   #297
mattm
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Bikes:
Posts: 13,908
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 223 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by umd View Post
The TSS & IF chart shows you the average over all rides for the day... did you have more than one ride?
oddly, no.

i think what happend is that i upped my FT around that time, and somehow the chart didn't update (even after restart of WKO). so my guess is that the .98 is just the old invalid IF.
__________________
cat 1.

blog
mattm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-09, 01:39 PM   #298
wfrogge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 3,917
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Do the e-wang 5s, 1m, and 5m, come from track sprinters? Still a shame that my 5sec and 5m numbers are the only ones in CAT 3 range ... My 1m is upper CAT 5 lol
wfrogge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-09, 02:48 PM   #299
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
Posts: 26,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wfrogge View Post
Do the e-wang 5s, 1m, and 5m, come from track sprinters? Still a shame that my 5sec and 5m numbers are the only ones in CAT 3 range ... My 1m is upper CAT 5 lol
Yes, the 5" and 1' are anchored at the top by pro track sprinter/kilo types.

I don't believe your 1' power could be that out of line. Mind posting your 1' test graph? Feel free to leave off the scales if you care. The 1' power test should start off with a real sprint (w/in 90% of your max 5"), then just keep going.
waterrockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-09, 05:33 PM   #300
pcates
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Bikes:
Posts: 762
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
sorry to change the subject, but i was curious about what sort of TSS numbers one should be aiming for in terms of hard days, easy days and weekly?
pcates is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:06 PM.