Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 184 of 256 FirstFirst ... 84134174182183184185186194234 ... LastLast
Results 4,576 to 4,600 of 6379
  1. #4576
    Senior Member jsutkeepspining's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    ohioland/right near hicville farmtown
    Posts
    4,725
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rkwaki View Post
    And watching porn to keep my heart rate up.
    i never stop watching porn, one time a teacher was like "what u watching mark", and i was all like "big booty ***** 3". hilarity ensued.
    cat 1-o-meter: wtf am i doing??????
    Quote Originally Posted by Racer Ex View Post
    You're not dumb. You're just less smart.

  2. #4577
    soon to be gsteinc... rkwaki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    getting photographed by rockets...
    Posts
    8,134
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jsutkeepspining View Post
    i never stop watching porn, one time a teacher was like "what u watching mark", and i was all like "big booty dudes 3". hilarity ensued.
    Figures...
    "if you ride it the way it's meant to be ridden there's no way any wife is less of a ***** than a bicycle." - gstein

  3. #4578
    Senior Member jsutkeepspining's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    ohioland/right near hicville farmtown
    Posts
    4,725
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i might be smart, but i sure as hell ain't boring!
    cat 1-o-meter: wtf am i doing??????
    Quote Originally Posted by Racer Ex View Post
    You're not dumb. You're just less smart.

  4. #4579
    Senior Member jsutkeepspining's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    ohioland/right near hicville farmtown
    Posts
    4,725
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    wait **** i just read your change! DAMN U KWAKI
    cat 1-o-meter: wtf am i doing??????
    Quote Originally Posted by Racer Ex View Post
    You're not dumb. You're just less smart.

  5. #4580
    Senior Member crapweasel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    322
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by shovelhd View Post
    The number doesn't matter as long as it's under 1000. What matters is that each time you calibrate it, it's within 10 or 20 points depending on the temperature swing.
    Right, as long as for a given ride it's close at the start and end, and over time it doesn't go crazy without outside influence. That part I got. But changing so much from a re-torque seems to tell me something was off before. I could be wrong. We'll see what the numbers look like after today's ride and the weekend's race.

  6. #4581
    These Guys Eat Oreos Creatre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    My Bikes
    Yes
    Posts
    3,370
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by crapweasel View Post
    So I retorqued my chainring bolts on the Quarq. Calibration zero went from -360 to -160. I'm not sure if this a good thing or not.
    That's pretty normal. It'll need to settle at a new zero offset after a retorque.
    Category 2 | | Velogames BikeForums Leagues: 1st - 2012 Veulta, 1st - 2011 Vuelta, 2nd - 2013 Vuelta, 3rd - 2012 Giro, 4th - 2012 TdF

  7. #4582
    I need speed AzTallRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    My Bikes
    Giant Propel, Cervelo P2
    Posts
    5,487
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by crapweasel View Post
    Right, as long as for a given ride it's close at the start and end, and over time it doesn't go crazy without outside influence. That part I got. But changing so much from a re-torque seems to tell me something was off before. I could be wrong. We'll see what the numbers look like after today's ride and the weekend's race.
    If it was "off" before, that didn't matter so long as you were zeroing it and it wasn't changing during a ride. Depending on how you did the re-torque, and whether it was really 'seated' previously, it may go right back to where it was. 200 isn't huge for a re-torque, from my experience. You will get to the point where you can predict the zero-offset value you are going to get, based on the ambient temperature.

  8. #4583
    Senior Member jsutkeepspining's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    ohioland/right near hicville farmtown
    Posts
    4,725
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i know it will be between 350-410 (both are extremes . In the middle of winter at sub 20 degrees i see low 350's at 100+ degrees it will be low 400's. On most normal days it is between 370-390 (370 is 40 to 50 degree, 380 is high 50-75 degrees, and 390 is for like 75-100)
    cat 1-o-meter: wtf am i doing??????
    Quote Originally Posted by Racer Ex View Post
    You're not dumb. You're just less smart.

  9. #4584
    You blink and it's gone. rbart4506's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dundas, Ontario
    My Bikes
    Race bike, training bike, go fast bike and a trainer slave.
    Posts
    4,410
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Finally got my Quarq to calibrate tonight at the end of my ride (-109)...

    Tried a couple times in Georgia at the start of the ride and the Garmin would just sit there, calibrating. Seeing that the calibration takes longer if the Garmin has not finished finding an HRM or satellites, could having other power meters close by cause an issue? Tonight I finished my ride alone, while the other times my wife was there with her powertap active....
    "On the other hand riding down a hill at 55 MPH wearing (essentially) women's underwear and a Styrofoam cup on your head is the epitome of rational life-extending decisions." - RacerEx

  10. #4585
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New England
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Xenith Comp
    Posts
    797
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rbart4506 View Post
    could having other power meters close by cause an issue? Tonight I finished my ride alone, while the other times my wife was there with her powertap active....
    yes, but the garmin will tell you if this happens. it'll say "multiple power meters detected" or something like that.

  11. #4586
    negligent. slynkie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    White Plains, NY
    My Bikes
    a few
    Posts
    894
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rbart4506 View Post
    Finally got my Quarq to calibrate tonight at the end of my ride (-109)...

    Tried a couple times in Georgia at the start of the ride and the Garmin would just sit there, calibrating. Seeing that the calibration takes longer if the Garmin has not finished finding an HRM or satellites, could having other power meters close by cause an issue? Tonight I finished my ride alone, while the other times my wife was there with her powertap active....
    If you're able to activate the "calibrate" function, then you've already paired with a power meter (though, not necessarily yours!), and other power meters in the area wouldn't interfere.

    btw I've never heard of it taking longer due to the garmin not yet having gotten a good GPS lock yet. In fact, I don't turn on my garmin until I go outside, so I almost never have a GPS lock yet when I zero at the start of a ride. The missing HRM definitely can delay the calibrate function, for me up to maybe 20-25 seconds - ymmv I suppose.

  12. #4587
    I need speed AzTallRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    My Bikes
    Giant Propel, Cervelo P2
    Posts
    5,487
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you also use a speed and/or cadence sensor, activating it prior to calibration also helps.

  13. #4588
    These Guys Eat Oreos Creatre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    My Bikes
    Yes
    Posts
    3,370
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rbart4506 View Post
    Finally got my Quarq to calibrate tonight at the end of my ride (-109)...

    Tried a couple times in Georgia at the start of the ride and the Garmin would just sit there, calibrating. Seeing that the calibration takes longer if the Garmin has not finished finding an HRM or satellites, could having other power meters close by cause an issue? Tonight I finished my ride alone, while the other times my wife was there with her powertap active....
    A couple things on this:

    First, I dont think it has to do with multiple power meters. It should have your ID saved after it finds it the first time, and should not be searching for the others. Second, you are correct with the HRM or satellites still searching will cause delays here. This is a big one, definitely make sure they are done with this. Third, I found if I spin it backwards a couple times, get it exactly at 6 o'clock on the drive side. Then, go down to whatever the third option is (I forgot, it's called like powermeter status or something). Once you click on this it will say connected and give you the powermeter ID. Click back, then calibrate. For some reason selecting that option and then calibrating speeds up the process dramatically. I still sometimes have trouble with it calibrating, but 95% of the time it will calibrate in 10 seconds or less.

    The last thing that could cause a problem would be if your garmin is getting close to being full. For some reason this causes Garmins to start acting funny and slow (memory issue I guess?). Anyways, make sure you keep that guy under 50% full.

    Hope that helps!
    Category 2 | | Velogames BikeForums Leagues: 1st - 2012 Veulta, 1st - 2011 Vuelta, 2nd - 2013 Vuelta, 3rd - 2012 Giro, 4th - 2012 TdF

  14. #4589
    Senior Member kleinboogie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    2,602
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rbart4506 View Post
    Finally got my Quarq to calibrate tonight at the end of my ride (-109)...
    Tried a couple times in Georgia at the start of the ride and the Garmin would just sit there, calibrating. Seeing that the calibration takes longer if the Garmin has not finished finding an HRM or satellites, could having other power meters close by cause an issue? Tonight I finished my ride alone, while the other times my wife was there with her powertap active....
    That's what mine did and it had a stuck sensor switch. If you have an iphone with the ant+ doohicky, load up their app and run the diags. It will tell you the state of the switches. If not I'm sure quarq will take a look at it. GL

  15. #4590
    Senior Member shovelhd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Western MA
    My Bikes
    Yes
    Posts
    11,886
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Very true about the Garmin getting full. It can go wonky and need a reset. Mine has been doing this lately. Time for a backup and flush.

  16. #4591
    You blink and it's gone. rbart4506's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dundas, Ontario
    My Bikes
    Race bike, training bike, go fast bike and a trainer slave.
    Posts
    4,410
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks guys...

    I'll give those a whirl tonight, assuming it doesn't snow!

    One other thing I should probably check is the Cadence\Speed sensor setting. I don't have a Garmin sensor mounted, but I did and I know I have not switched this feature off in the bike setting. That may also be slowing things down as it searches for the non-present sensor...
    "On the other hand riding down a hill at 55 MPH wearing (essentially) women's underwear and a Styrofoam cup on your head is the epitome of rational life-extending decisions." - RacerEx

  17. #4592
    coffee-stained punk hammy56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    6,619
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    picked up the power tap SL+ laced to DT Swiss rr585 for $575...mint cond, seems to work nicely.

    got it paired to the garmin, calibration resulted in 0.00 torque. Is this good?

  18. #4593
    soon to be gsteinc... rkwaki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    getting photographed by rockets...
    Posts
    8,134
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hammy56 View Post
    picked up the power tap SL+ laced to DT Swiss rr585 for $575...mint cond, seems to work nicely.

    got it paired to the garmin, calibration resulted in 0.00 torque. Is this good?
    You found that one on Craigslist out there didn't you?

    And if memory servies me right 0 is good.
    "if you ride it the way it's meant to be ridden there's no way any wife is less of a ***** than a bicycle." - gstein

  19. #4594
    coffee-stained punk hammy56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    6,619
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rkwaki View Post
    You found that one on Craigslist out there didn't you?

    And if memory servies me right 0 is good.
    yep...so far it seems like a great deal.

  20. #4595
    soon to be gsteinc... rkwaki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    getting photographed by rockets...
    Posts
    8,134
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hammy56 View Post
    yep...so far it seems like a great deal.
    I saw that. My SRM came from Craigslist in Denver.
    "if you ride it the way it's meant to be ridden there's no way any wife is less of a ***** than a bicycle." - gstein

  21. #4596
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New England
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Xenith Comp
    Posts
    797
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hammy56 View Post
    picked up the power tap SL+ laced to DT Swiss rr585 for $575...mint cond, seems to work nicely.

    got it paired to the garmin, calibration resulted in 0.00 torque. Is this good?
    yes. the calibration number should be around 510 +/- 10 or something. mine is usually about 515-520.

  22. #4597
    coffee-stained punk hammy56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    6,619
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by climber7 View Post
    yes. the calibration number should be around 510 +/- 10 or something. mine is usually about 515-520.
    how is that similar to my result?

  23. #4598
    Senior Member jsutkeepspining's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    ohioland/right near hicville farmtown
    Posts
    4,725
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the number on top is what he's referring to. the 0.00 you see in the torque section means there is not force being paced on the powermeter at the moment. this is good, unless u are putting force on it....
    cat 1-o-meter: wtf am i doing??????
    Quote Originally Posted by Racer Ex View Post
    You're not dumb. You're just less smart.

  24. #4599
    coffee-stained punk hammy56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    6,619
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the other number I got (above the torque value) I believe was the powermeter ID...? Which was a 4 digit number, 5_ _ _.


    *EDIT* found this information which explains why I only see the hub I.D. and 0.00 torque, which I suppose is normal with the older hub's firmware...

    The torque offset should be 512 plus or minus 12 (though they may have relaxed this to 24), but your PT hub needs to be pretty new to show this on an Edge as this was only added in firmware release 6.49 by Saris. Prior to this firmware release the hub just transmitted the hub ID and not the offset so you may actually need access to a Saris/Cycleops head unit to see the offset.
    Last edited by hammy56; 03-21-13 at 03:14 PM.

  25. #4600
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    NM
    My Bikes
    SL2 S-Works
    Posts
    33
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So an update on my end. I redid my 20 min FTP test today on the trainer, after calibrating my meter. I did see an improvement up to 213 watts for my FTP. This seemed more accurate but still seemed low compared to what I'm producing outside. Do you guys usually do better outdoors than on the trainer? For me, it doesn't seem like I can hold the same power for as long as if I'm out on the bike. I was thinking about doing the test outside on the bike over a nice 4% climb and using the FTP I get on that ride as my base for all my outdoor riding. I guess I could use my 213 for a baseline on the trainer too. Do you guys think I should just stick to the 1 FTP value indoors or also get a value that I can use out on the bike as well?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •