Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-13-14, 10:47 AM   #6076
tetonrider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 3,525
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovoleg View Post
tells me I need to HTFU more.


I know its depressing tho, at least for my early adjustment period.



Yeah I'm letting it go(slowly haha). I am gonna just massage my brain into the new numbers and roll with it and go for progress with the powertap. I dont want to give up power data collection on the track so the Quarq is staying on the track bike.
maybe the quarq will give reliable numbers on the track.

tetonrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-14, 06:08 PM   #6077
oespinoza83
burp
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Houston
Bikes:
Posts: 173
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I need to update my FTP. Does anyone actually just skip the formal test and just go off of MMPC 20' values?
oespinoza83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-14, 07:29 PM   #6078
tetonrider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 3,525
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by oespinoza83 View Post
I need to update my FTP. Does anyone actually just skip the formal test and just go off of MMPC 20' values?
how do you now you need to update it? i'm assuming you've had some efforts that exceed your threshold, or "threshold" efforts have become easy/easier.

use it as a cue to do a proper test. further, in case you haven't already done so, establish a consistent protocol -- same warm-up, same test, ideally same time of day/course/rest/etc. the more variables you control the better the comparisons over time will be. hell, if you can wear similar clothing and use the same bike/wheels/tires, that is not a bad thing -- just in case your power meter is off you may be able to use speed or distance as a check of the data (if your chosen route is on a climb/windless area or indoors (rollers/trainer)).

may not seem important now but has value over time.
tetonrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-14, 07:51 PM   #6079
revchuck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Bikes: Cannondale CAAD9
Posts: 5,677
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tetonrider View Post
how do you now you need to update it? i'm assuming you've had some efforts that exceed your threshold, or "threshold" efforts have become easy/easier.
He posted a 489 TSS/.96 IF 5:25 ride, and some of us raised our eyebrows.
revchuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-14, 11:33 PM   #6080
jmikami
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Alpenrose - Portland
Bikes: Veloforma for my primary.
Posts: 361
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by oespinoza83 View Post
I need to update my FTP. Does anyone actually just skip the formal test and just go off of MMPC 20' values?
I use NP from races and rides that are as long as possible combined with RPE from those events (one hour plus is better for me, but must be a hard effort) to keep me on pace with FTP. To me it is just an estimate and I basically create a sliding scale through the season raising it up and dropping it back down after my peaks. I hate 20+ minute flatout efforts and do so few of them that it really doesn't make sense to do them all the time just to perfect my IF/TSS score. Some people swear by 20 minute TTs, but I can tell based on my average 10 minute power, combined with NP during hard rides what it should be. I also find that I can keep my IF near 1 for almost 3 hours, but I have a very hard time keeping my average power at the same level for 20 minutes, so who knows what it really is, but the point is to track your own fitness/form/fatigue/whatever not to be perfect as that is not possible.

NP is all about exaggerating your hard efforts and for riders like myself who like to go hard then go easy and can do that for hours, it creates a false sense of what I might be able to do for the same distance as an average in TT mode. MY rule is have fun and estimate your FTP as best you can, but don't stress over that kind of detail. I am more worried about my ability to repeat efforts and how my HR responds to those hard efforts than if my FTP might be off by 10+ watts.
jmikami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-14, 06:17 AM   #6081
oespinoza83
burp
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Houston
Bikes:
Posts: 173
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yea, I have a testing protocol that I did earlier this season (during base) that I can do again. I just didn't know if people always use a formal testing when updating/checking their FTP or if they go based off other factors.
oespinoza83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-14, 06:28 AM   #6082
shovelhd 
Senior Member
 
shovelhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Bikes: Yes
Posts: 15,485
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
I use formal testing. Same course.
shovelhd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-14, 07:34 AM   #6083
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
Posts: 26,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I've been picking zones off of interval performance lately. Since I'm more likely to go too hard than too easy, this has gotten me pretty close. That said, I haven't formally threshold tested in about 2 years (when I got sick). Given my recent performance, I'm getting back on the bandwagon of monthly testing (5", 1', 5', and MAP).
waterrockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-14, 09:07 AM   #6084
Creatre
These Guys Eat Oreos
 
Creatre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Bikes: Yes
Posts: 3,422
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I prefer setting zones based on interval values, it tends to be a bit more realistic. You can see trends/patterns more easily if you do intervals routinely.
Creatre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-14, 09:27 AM   #6085
furiousferret
Senior Member
 
furiousferret's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redlands, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 4,488
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
I use the same course, or did. Since it has 2 small descents that sap my power I may try to find something new.
furiousferret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-14, 05:13 PM   #6086
Ygduf 
\_(ツ)_/
 
Ygduf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Posts: 9,393
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
cycling analytics just rolled out a nice feature that I liked. find efforts, minimum time of XXX watts

Attached Images
File Type: png Vl08pxI.png (53.9 KB, 49 views)
__________________

strava.com/athletes/ygduf
Ygduf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-14, 05:34 PM   #6087
Hermes 
Elite Rider
 
Hermes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Bikes: Too Many
Posts: 9,746
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ygduf View Post
cycling analytics just rolled out a nice feature that I liked. find efforts, minimum time of XXX watts

I use Cycling Analytics as well. David is doing a excellent job improving the software and he is very responsive to comments and suggestions.
__________________
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit. Aristotle

Cat: Killer
Hermes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-14, 07:55 PM   #6088
furiousferret
Senior Member
 
furiousferret's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redlands, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 4,488
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermes View Post
I use Cycling Analytics as well. David is doing a excellent job improving the software and he is very responsive to comments and suggestions.
When I first joined he sent me an email asking for suggestions, I gave a few and he seemed genuinely interested in which was pretty cool.
furiousferret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-14, 08:13 PM   #6089
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
Posts: 26,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Creatre View Post
I prefer setting zones based on interval values, it tends to be a bit more realistic. You can see trends/patterns more easily if you do intervals routinely.
Yep, that's what I've been doing for the last two to three years. I figured I'd toss it up. At least the interval guess lines up with the test result. Verification for my interval method. I still need to do a real test for 5" and 1'. I did 5' last week, four rows above my FTP, so at least I know where to keep focusing my main efforts. I'll bet that 1' is pretty weak right now though.

Last edited by waterrockets; 04-21-14 at 08:16 PM.
waterrockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-14, 12:54 AM   #6090
Racer Ex 
Resident Alien
 
Racer Ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Bikes:
Posts: 12,526
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by oespinoza83 View Post
Yea, I have a testing protocol that I did earlier this season (during base) that I can do again. I just didn't know if people always use a formal testing when updating/checking their FTP or if they go based off other factors.
I create charts in WKO that allow me to look at a variety of mean maximal wattages, both average and NP, for a variety of durations, from 1 second to 60 minutes, along with a standardized and periodized testing protocol.

For my athletes I check 7/28/season periods weekly to see trends and adjust as the test results or charts warrant.
Racer Ex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-14, 04:19 AM   #6091
gsteinb
out walking the earth
 
gsteinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: teh Jersey
Bikes:
Posts: 19,851
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
rain man
gsteinb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-14, 06:23 AM   #6092
bbbean 
Senior Member
 
bbbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Posts: 1,416
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Is there a good side by side comparison of power analysis aps?
__________________
www.beancotton.com
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton

bbbean is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-14, 04:18 PM   #6093
aaronmcd
Senior Member
 
aaronmcd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Bikes: Cervelo S5
Posts: 2,460
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Powertap torque issues.

I did some file digging, and the oddly high power numbers from this week's Wednesday ride were due to Torque not being zeroed.

For months I have had no issues, then the Wednesday ride from last week shows coasting torque = 0 before the halfway break, and coasting torque = ~1.3 Nm after the break. I was getting way low, but proportional power numbers the next day so I changed the battery. Turned it on at Copperopolis Road Race and it seemed to be fine (looking back, the torque was off by 1.3 Nm for the first 1/4 or so then fixed itself). Noticed this week that I have to zero the torque every time I turn it on or it reads 1.3 to 1.5 Nm while coasting. Power will still go to zero, but only after about 5 seconds of coasting.
aaronmcd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-14, 08:13 PM   #6094
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
Posts: 26,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Damn. I'm using the original little yellow computer (PowerTap). Interface is a ridiculous USB serial device. Golden Cheetah requires FTDI drivers for the interface in Windows 7, and every year or so one of the USB ports stops working with the driver. Finally, my last port no longer works, and I can't uninstall the driver (stupid CDM utility doesn't detect it). Has anyone else dealt with this? I reinstalled GC, and rebooted. I can't find FTDI in the registry.

#thecrapiputupwith
waterrockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-14, 06:01 AM   #6095
shovelhd 
Senior Member
 
shovelhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Bikes: Yes
Posts: 15,485
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
It's time, dude. It's time.
shovelhd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-14, 06:16 AM   #6096
revchuck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Bikes: Cannondale CAAD9
Posts: 5,677
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
FTDI = "eff this damned interface?"
revchuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-14, 07:04 AM   #6097
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
Posts: 26,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by shovelhd View Post
It's time, dude. It's time.
It's kinda stupid though. All I need are the numbers, and this ancient system works fine -- feels stupid to buy some 4-digit solution for two bikes just because of an old serial interface. Maybe I should move back to TraningPeaks.
waterrockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-14, 07:16 AM   #6098
shovelhd 
Senior Member
 
shovelhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Bikes: Yes
Posts: 15,485
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Not even close. You're looking at $350 plus shipping to upgrade your wheel to G3 and $300 for a Garmin 510. This gets you a brand new power meter and a brand new head unit. You can save $100 or more if you can score a used Garmin 500 or a wireless LYC, and your old LYC is still worth $50 to someone.

I know, I know, you're one of those guys who hates software companies that deprecate functions or end of life operating systems because they did everything you needed and nothing more.
shovelhd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-14, 07:29 AM   #6099
echappist 
fuggitivo solitario
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Arlington, VA
Bikes:
Posts: 8,790
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
the Joule is even cheaper. $80 or so, i think
echappist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-14, 03:34 PM   #6100
Creakyknees
ride lots be safe
 
Creakyknees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Bikes:
Posts: 5,196
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
my SRM PC VI head unit won't hold a charge for more than a couple of days. What should I do?
Creakyknees is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:24 PM.