Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 4 of 252 FirstFirst ... 234561454104 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 6292
  1. #76
    Senior Member tanhalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    772
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by umd View Post
    4 power meters and no HR...
    Nope...IMHO, HR is redundant if you've got a PM.

    After all, HR isn't a measure of the effort/load, it's a measure of a response to the effort/load...and a highly damped one as well. Not to mention the myriad of other things that can adversely affect HR one way or the other.

    It seems to me that power and PE together work pretty well without any other "measures"

    That said, HR is better than nothing if you don't have a PM, at least for long, steady-state efforts.

  2. #77
    umd
    umd is offline
    Banned umd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
    Posts
    28,343
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tanhalt View Post
    Nope...IMHO, HR is redundant if you've got a PM.

    After all, HR isn't a measure of the effort/load, it's a measure of a response to the effort/load...and a highly damped one as well. Not to mention the myriad of other things that can adversely affect HR one way or the other.

    It seems to me that power and PE together work pretty well without any other "measures"

    That said, HR is better than nothing if you don't have a PM, at least for long, steady-state efforts.
    I was just giving you a hard time about the 4 PMs. Did you end up taking the Polar or the iBike off?

  3. #78
    slow up hills kudude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    My Bikes
    Giant TCR, Redline CX, Ritchey Breakaway, Spec S-works epic
    Posts
    4,931
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by waterrockets View Post
    +1 to 5s power averaging.
    I assume you choose to display on a 5s rolling average, but store data for each second. correct?
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_tom View Post
    Cycling isn't a sport. It's more like a really, really expensive eating disorder.

  4. #79
    Writin' stuff ZeCanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    3,779
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yep
    Velo Magazine/VeloNews.com tech guy get in touch or hit me on the tweeter @CaleyFretz

  5. #80
    Senior Member tanhalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    772
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kudude View Post
    I assume you choose to display on a 5s rolling average, but store data for each second. correct?
    Yes...the nice thing is that they are separately selectable.

    Technically, the minimum sample rate on the PT is 1.26s and that's the best rate to use (if you aren't "memory limited" for the ride at hand) because selecting anything longer ends up in data being "thrown away" since the PT head unit will just store whatever happened in the last 1.26s before it stores...otherwise known as "downsampling"...not good

  6. #81
    Carpe Diem bdcheung's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    MABRA
    My Bikes
    2007 CAAD9; 2008 Giant Bowery; 2008 Surly Crosscheck
    Posts
    13,130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I still wear a HR strap, because i'm a data junkie. Plus when I preach about power meters to my teammates I can show them the graph and say "See how my HR goes up over the course of my 1-hr SST session, but power remains constant? If I was training based on HR alone, I'd be way under-doing it in the last half of the interval!"
    "When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
    ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!

  7. #82
    Senior Member tanhalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    772
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by umd View Post
    I was just giving you a hard time about the 4 PMs. Did you end up taking the Polar or the iBike off?
    I know

    The Polar is close to coming off since it's not telling me anything I don't know already about it, or about the other PMs...however, I promised one of the guys at Velocomp that I'd throw him a sample Polar output on a trainer to show how "flaky" it can be. The interest is if one could still use a Polar to "calibrate" an iBike for "trainer mode" despite the flakiness.... hmmm, maybe I'll do that at lunchtime today since I decided to take an "easy day"...then I can finally take that off.

    My bike will suddenly be 1/2 lb lower weight

  8. #83
    slow up hills kudude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    My Bikes
    Giant TCR, Redline CX, Ritchey Breakaway, Spec S-works epic
    Posts
    4,931
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tanhalt View Post
    Yes...the nice thing is that they are separately selectable.

    Technically, the minimum sample rate on the PT is 1.26s and that's the best rate to use (if you aren't "memory limited" for the ride at hand) because selecting anything longer ends up in data being "thrown away" since the PT head unit will just store whatever happened in the last 1.26s before it stores...otherwise known as "downsampling"...not good
    i prefer to downsample in post-processing. throwing away data should be a choice that you can reverse
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_tom View Post
    Cycling isn't a sport. It's more like a really, really expensive eating disorder.

  9. #84
    Village Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bahstaaaaan
    Posts
    19,911
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm pretty sure I have my SRM set at 1 second intervals. I'll download data after every ride or two and since most of my rides aren't longer than 2-3 hours, the 6 hour setup works well.

    I do need to go back and read the manual since I kept going into interval mode while trying to calibrate it yesterday. I couldn't get out of interval mode, so I just kept pressing buttons till something else happened haha.
    Truth, like light, blinds. Falsehood, on the contrary, is a beautiful twilight that enhances every object.
    -Albert Camus

    Hammer Nutrition 15% discount!!!

  10. #85
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Just this side of insanity.
    My Bikes
    Too many
    Posts
    574
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    OK, I just got my powertap two days ago. I purchased the Allen & Coggan book about a month ago and read it cover-to-cover. So tonight I did the test from Chapter 3 on Functional Threshold Power, and I would like to make sure that I'm on the right track.

    I followed their instructions religiously by taping a small guide on my handlebars while on my Kurt Kinetic trainer. I did the warmup as they proscribe, and then the 20 minute time trial. Oh, and if it matters, yesterday was my "rest" day and I did about an hour's worth of light spinning.

    After downloading the data, the 20 minute time trial average power was 263.2 watts. According to the book, that means that 95% of that number, or 250.04 is my FTP. Since I weigh 155 pounds, or 70kg, that means my wkg value at FTP is 3.57

    Does this sound like the right methodology and conclusion? Is doing the TT on the trainer good or bad?

  11. #86
    Village Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bahstaaaaan
    Posts
    19,911
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by challaday View Post
    OK, I just got my powertap two days ago. I purchased the Allen & Coggan book about a month ago and read it cover-to-cover. So tonight I did the test from Chapter 3 on Functional Threshold Power, and I would like to make sure that I'm on the right track.

    I followed their instructions religiously by taping a small guide on my handlebars while on my Kurt Kinetic trainer. I did the warmup as they proscribe, and then the 20 minute time trial. Oh, and if it matters, yesterday was my "rest" day and I did about an hour's worth of light spinning.

    After downloading the data, the 20 minute time trial average power was 263.2 watts. According to the book, that means that 95% of that number, or 250.04 is my FTP. Since I weigh 155 pounds, or 70kg, that means my wkg value at FTP is 3.57

    Does this sound like the right methodology and conclusion? Is doing the TT on the trainer good or bad?
    I think you're on the right track. If you do the test on the trainer, make sure you repeat it on the trainer everytime to exclude outside variables. Personally, I think testing on the trainer is the way to go.

    Also, I would do a MAP test and see if your 20 minute interval falls in the range of 72-78% of MAP. Use it as a check.

    Heh, your FTP and W/KG is right around mine. I'm ~68Kg.
    Truth, like light, blinds. Falsehood, on the contrary, is a beautiful twilight that enhances every object.
    -Albert Camus

    Hammer Nutrition 15% discount!!!

  12. #87
    Making a kilometer blurry waterrockets's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin (near TX)
    My Bikes
    rkwaki's porn collection
    Posts
    25,988
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    95% is a very rough estimate.

    On the trainer, you will likely be a little underpowered because of the inertial effects on your pedal stroke.

    So, figure +/- 5% on the 95% number, and +/- 10% on the trainer effect, and you're at +/- 15%.

    Just go train for a while and see what the numbers are showing you.

  13. #88
    Village Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bahstaaaaan
    Posts
    19,911
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by waterrockets View Post
    95% is a very rough estimate.

    On the trainer, you will likely be a little underpowered because of the inertial effects on your pedal stroke.

    So, figure +/- 5% on the 95% number, and +/- 10% on the trainer effect, and you're at +/- 15%.

    Just go train for a while and see what the numbers are showing you.
    Hm. I'm a little perplexed. I was under the impression that your seated W/Kg on a trainer would be higher since you're meeting resistance in every part of the pedal stroke and you can't 'con' your way out of your dead spot as easily as you can on the road.

    When standing this isn't the case since you can't really move the bike under you and this generates power.
    Truth, like light, blinds. Falsehood, on the contrary, is a beautiful twilight that enhances every object.
    -Albert Camus

    Hammer Nutrition 15% discount!!!

  14. #89
    umd
    umd is offline
    Banned umd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
    Posts
    28,343
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ridethecliche View Post
    Hm. I'm a little perplexed. I was under the impression that your seated W/Kg on a trainer would be higher since you're meeting resistance in every part of the pedal stroke and you can't 'con' your way out of your dead spot as easily as you can on the road.

    When standing this isn't the case since you can't really move the bike under you and this generates power.
    I can't get as much power on the trainer, seated or otherwise.

  15. #90
    Village Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bahstaaaaan
    Posts
    19,911
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by umd View Post
    I can't get as much power on the trainer, seated or otherwise.
    Why do you think this is?

    Is my logic reversed? Are we forced to spend more time in our deadspot while on the trainer?

    This would reduce power during the dead spot, force more time there, and decrease average power.
    Truth, like light, blinds. Falsehood, on the contrary, is a beautiful twilight that enhances every object.
    -Albert Camus

    Hammer Nutrition 15% discount!!!

  16. #91
    Writin' stuff ZeCanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    3,779
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would attribute it to having nothing else to think about but my legs hurting.

    At least outside I have to use some brain power to not fall over.
    Velo Magazine/VeloNews.com tech guy get in touch or hit me on the tweeter @CaleyFretz

  17. #92
    Village Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bahstaaaaan
    Posts
    19,911
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ZeCanon View Post
    I would attribute it to having nothing else to think about but my legs hurting.

    At least outside I have to use some brain power to not fall over.
    LOL!

    I watch movies or blast movies while on the trainer. I actually don't mind riding the trainer while doing that. 1 hour max (with intervals) if just listening to music. I can go for 1.5+ hours if I'm watching a race, show, movie, whatever.
    Truth, like light, blinds. Falsehood, on the contrary, is a beautiful twilight that enhances every object.
    -Albert Camus

    Hammer Nutrition 15% discount!!!

  18. #93
    Making a kilometer blurry waterrockets's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin (near TX)
    My Bikes
    rkwaki's porn collection
    Posts
    25,988
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think it has to do with the inertial differences between the road and the trainer. If you stop pedaling on the trainer, it doesn't take long to come to a complete stop. On the road, it takes a really long time. So, on the trainer, the dead part of your stroke (with reduced power) is going to decelerate more than on the road.

    This means that you're spending energy accelerating the wheel more with each pedal stroke, which means that your normal applied torque will be multiplied by a lower angular velocity on the crank or the wheel, until you get back up to speed during the stroke. Lower angular velocity means less power.

  19. #94
    Village Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bahstaaaaan
    Posts
    19,911
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by waterrockets View Post
    I think it has to do with the inertial differences between the road and the trainer. If you stop pedaling on the trainer, it doesn't take long to come to a complete stop. On the road, it takes a really long time. So, on the trainer, the dead part of your stroke (with reduced power) is going to decelerate more than on the road.

    This means that you're spending energy accelerating the wheel more with each pedal stroke, which means that your normal applied torque will be multiplied by a lower angular velocity on the crank or the wheel, until you get back up to speed during the stroke. Lower angular velocity means less power.
    That's basically what I was trying to say less elegantly. Thanks WR!
    Truth, like light, blinds. Falsehood, on the contrary, is a beautiful twilight that enhances every object.
    -Albert Camus

    Hammer Nutrition 15% discount!!!

  20. #95
    newbie rider
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    481
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    so basically those ftp tests are just testing your power in a 20minute time frame?
    gotta go try that....

  21. #96
    bf is my facebook. ljrichar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Greensboro, NC
    Posts
    1,146
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mista_chewey View Post
    so basically those ftp tests are just testing your power in a 20minute time frame?
    gotta go try that....
    Not exactly. FTP is the power you can hold for a 60min time trial. That is why they were taking 95% of the 20min time as an estimate of FTP.

  22. #97
    I am the cheese sgrundy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Cycling Purgatory (Brooklyn, NY)
    Posts
    236
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by waterrockets View Post
    I think it has to do with the inertial differences between the road and the trainer. If you stop pedaling on the trainer, it doesn't take long to come to a complete stop. On the road, it takes a really long time. So, on the trainer, the dead part of your stroke (with reduced power) is going to decelerate more than on the road.

    This means that you're spending energy accelerating the wheel more with each pedal stroke, which means that your normal applied torque will be multiplied by a lower angular velocity on the crank or the wheel, until you get back up to speed during the stroke. Lower angular velocity means less power.
    That's part of it. The other part is that it can be hard to stay cool indoors. If you have a trainer with a massive flywheel and a huge fan nearby you might actually be able to exceed the power that you can generate outdoors. However, I've read that after a few weeks of adapting to the trainer indoor and outdoor power numbers start to converge, so if you're on the trainer a lot there might not be a significant difference.

  23. #98
    Making a kilometer blurry waterrockets's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin (near TX)
    My Bikes
    rkwaki's porn collection
    Posts
    25,988
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sgrundy View Post
    That's part of it. The other part is that it can be hard to stay cool indoors. If you have a trainer with a massive flywheel and a huge fan nearby you might actually be able to exceed the power that you can generate outdoors. However, I've read that after a few weeks of adapting to the trainer indoor and outdoor power numbers start to converge, so if you're on the trainer a lot there might not be a significant difference.
    yep

  24. #99

  25. #100
    bzzzz fuzzthebee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    360
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by challaday View Post
    OK, I just got my powertap two days ago. I purchased the Allen & Coggan book about a month ago and read it cover-to-cover. So tonight I did the test from Chapter 3 on Functional Threshold Power, and I would like to make sure that I'm on the right track.

    I followed their instructions religiously by taping a small guide on my handlebars while on my Kurt Kinetic trainer. I did the warmup as they proscribe, and then the 20 minute time trial. Oh, and if it matters, yesterday was my "rest" day and I did about an hour's worth of light spinning.

    After downloading the data, the 20 minute time trial average power was 263.2 watts. According to the book, that means that 95% of that number, or 250.04 is my FTP. Since I weigh 155 pounds, or 70kg, that means my wkg value at FTP is 3.57

    Does this sound like the right methodology and conclusion? Is doing the TT on the trainer good or bad?
    You might want to round off your power numbers. Power meters are not that precise, and niether is estimating FTP.

Page 4 of 252 FirstFirst ... 234561454104 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •