Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 63 of 252 FirstFirst ... 1353616263646573113163 ... LastLast
Results 1,551 to 1,575 of 6288
  1. #1551
    Making a kilometer blurry waterrockets's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin (near TX)
    My Bikes
    rkwaki's porn collection
    Posts
    25,965
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yep, some vocabulary confusion there. FTP is ~60 minutes. For shorter durations, proper terminology would be "1-minute mean-maximal power." A few say that as "1' MMP," but most say "1' power." Others also use "1-minute critical power," and state it as "CP1."

    So, "1' power," or "CP1" are what you'll usually see around here. Same for "5' power," or "20' power."

    For training over the winter, just follow the training status thread for a couple weeks and see what you can learn. Read the Friel book and the Hunter Allen/Andrew Coggan book.

  2. #1552
    Genetics have failed me Scummer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Zorneding, Germany
    My Bikes
    Pedalforce CX1 & Trek Madone 5.9
    Posts
    2,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Crap.. need to send my powertap back to Saris. Needs to be recalibrated
    Seems like the 5 in the test menu should show close to 512, mine shows 331.
    Gelato aficionado.

  3. #1553
    Making a kilometer blurry waterrockets's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin (near TX)
    My Bikes
    rkwaki's porn collection
    Posts
    25,965
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, it's looking like mine is ready for an overhaul. Bearings are shot. Lasted three years since the last overhaul, which isn't terrible, I guess.

  4. #1554
    Look KG386i
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    My Bikes
    2004 Look KG386i
    Posts
    230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by waterrockets View Post
    Yep, some vocabulary confusion there. FTP is ~60 minutes. For shorter durations, proper terminology would be "1-minute mean-maximal power." A few say that as "1' MMP," but most say "1' power." Others also use "1-minute critical power," and state it as "CP1."

    So, "1' power," or "CP1" are what you'll usually see around here. Same for "5' power," or "20' power."

    For training over the winter, just follow the training status thread for a couple weeks and see what you can learn. Read the Friel book and the Hunter Allen/Andrew Coggan book.
    Thanks for the info. A lot of what I know right now is purely anecdotal. Looking forward to learning about the science and terminology.

  5. #1555
    Village Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bahstaaaaan
    Posts
    19,904
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Buy Coggan/Allen's book.

    Oh, and read it too.
    Truth, like light, blinds. Falsehood, on the contrary, is a beautiful twilight that enhances every object.
    -Albert Camus

    Hammer Nutrition 15% discount!!!

  6. #1556
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    60
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a question about 5 minute and 10 minute power using Saris PowerAgent.

    I have only been training with power since the end of August and still getting used to setting up types of work outs that focus on increasing FTP. Well yesterday I was doing some hill sprints on my way home from work, not repeats but sprinting up a hill and then resting until the next, a minute or two usually.

    Well when I uploaded my data I saw that I set a new high for my 5 minute and 10 minute power under my power records. Now since I didnt do an outright 5 minute power test or 10 minute power test are these number sort of meaningless since they were obviously averages sprinting up the hills with my resting?

  7. #1557
    Making a kilometer blurry waterrockets's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin (near TX)
    My Bikes
    rkwaki's porn collection
    Posts
    25,965
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes, they're meaningless. You will destroy those numbers in real tests.

  8. #1558
    ..... Jynx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Long Island
    My Bikes
    2006 Cannondale CAAD8
    Posts
    4,823
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yea untill you get a lot of data and specificly do certain time frame intervals you will keep setting personal bests.

  9. #1559
    ɹǝʇsɯıʇ
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    MD
    My Bikes
    2011 Focus Whistler // 2011 Cannondale CAAD10 // 2009 Scattante XRL TT // 1993 Cannondale R400
    Posts
    841
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Through the offseason during base building, do you guys try to maintain CTL, or raise or lower it?

    For the past week or so I've been spending 90-120 minutes on the trainer at about 75% FTP per night and my CTL is slowly dropping.

    So is it best to try to maintain a constant CTL throughout the winter?

  10. #1560
    Making a kilometer blurry waterrockets's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin (near TX)
    My Bikes
    rkwaki's porn collection
    Posts
    25,965
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My CTL rarely gets over 60. I'm just trying to keep it from falling below 40 all the time.

  11. #1561
    ɹǝʇsɯıʇ
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    MD
    My Bikes
    2011 Focus Whistler // 2011 Cannondale CAAD10 // 2009 Scattante XRL TT // 1993 Cannondale R400
    Posts
    841
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Dang... I'm still pushing around 65 CTL. Maybe I should't be so concerned that it's dropping a little...

  12. #1562
    Ho-Jahm Hocam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Manchester, NH
    Posts
    4,228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The numbers not really important unless your building for a peak, and even then it's relative from person to person.

    More CTL does not necessarily mean faster/better, the makeup is important. Just like that ugly girlfriend from back in high school.
    Race-o-meter:
    Broken until next season

  13. #1563
    Making a kilometer blurry waterrockets's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin (near TX)
    My Bikes
    rkwaki's porn collection
    Posts
    25,965
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, like Bleh from Drawn Together

  14. #1564
    ..... Jynx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Long Island
    My Bikes
    2006 Cannondale CAAD8
    Posts
    4,823
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    huge thumbs up to training peaks. my computer got all screwed up so i reformatted it. i saved all my files and emailed them letting them know what happened. in 27 minutes i had a new key code and full instructions on what to do. great company and i didnt have to lose anything.

  15. #1565
    ..... Jynx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Long Island
    My Bikes
    2006 Cannondale CAAD8
    Posts
    4,823
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i was moving all the columns around and messed up the layout. i set it up back as close as i had it by memory (the default way) but can someone post a screenshot of the graph tab? I cant seem to get the layout how it originally came. thanks

  16. #1566
    Genetics have failed me Scummer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Zorneding, Germany
    My Bikes
    Pedalforce CX1 & Trek Madone 5.9
    Posts
    2,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sent my PT with wheel last Saturday to Saris and yesterday a box from Fedex with my newly calibrated PT was at the door. That is some QUICK turnaround.

    And yeah.. finally I can see power again, not the depressing 0W i've seen before, now it's 250W depressing.
    Gelato aficionado.

  17. #1567
    Making a kilometer blurry waterrockets's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin (near TX)
    My Bikes
    rkwaki's porn collection
    Posts
    25,965
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hmm. I sent mine last Friday, but I've been too busy to do any tracking.

    EDIT: it's still just showing "accepted" from when I sent it (meaning "I dropped it off at USPS"). Sweet. I insured it for $1k

  18. #1568
    ..... Jynx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Long Island
    My Bikes
    2006 Cannondale CAAD8
    Posts
    4,823
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not sure if this is starting to happen or I just never noticed but a lot of the data is slightly different then what the head unit displays. For the ride I just did today the headunit is 5kJ higher, shows 3 seconds less, and 20' power says 2 watts less. Also the cadences shown in the parenthesis in the graph tab are different then the average shown below for the time frame data. Everything else seems to be exact. I just don't remember having any variances until now. I know they are very small differences but am just wondering if this is normal or if something is going out of whack.
    Last edited by Jynx; 10-17-09 at 12:57 PM.

  19. #1569
    Village Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bahstaaaaan
    Posts
    19,904
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think it comes down to how the data times out with not pedaling etc.

    Nothing to worry about. I just go by the program.
    Truth, like light, blinds. Falsehood, on the contrary, is a beautiful twilight that enhances every object.
    -Albert Camus

    Hammer Nutrition 15% discount!!!

  20. #1570
    Making a kilometer blurry waterrockets's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin (near TX)
    My Bikes
    rkwaki's porn collection
    Posts
    25,965
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, the display might have a different interpretation of the samples in memory than your PC software. As long as you're not seeing like a steady % difference or something, don't sweat it. Just make sure you do your 1-minute tests for 1:03, just in case.

  21. #1571
    **** that mattm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    CALI
    Posts
    10,980
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jynx View Post
    Not sure if this is starting to happen or I just never noticed but a lot of the data is slightly different then what the head unit displays. For the ride I just did today the headunit is 5kJ higher, shows 3 seconds less, and 20' power says 2 watts less. Also the cadences shown in the parenthesis in the graph tab are different then the average shown below for the time frame data. Everything else seems to be exact. I just don't remember having any variances until now. I know they are very small differences but am just wondering if this is normal or if something is going out of whack.
    This is with the PT unit?

    My 705 seems to always display wildly different power #'s than WKO - avg power is always too high to WKO's AP, usually closer to NP (does it not count zeroes by default?)

    Fwiw I have the firmware from earlier this summer, haven't upgraded to the new stuff yet. I just take all the #'s with a grain or two of salt.

  22. #1572
    Ho-Jahm Hocam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Manchester, NH
    Posts
    4,228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    WKO counts zero's, chances are your PT is set to ignore them.
    Race-o-meter:
    Broken until next season

  23. #1573
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    99
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So I've got a season's worth of data and I'm finally getting the chance to reflect on my "progress."

    Before hunkering down into base, of course it stands to reason that I should have a solid understanding of where my zones are. But it hasn't been all that easy...

    Having a little difficulty reconciling my "true" FTP from a series of data points, specifically from races, hard group rides, a professionally administered fitness test (from last spring) and general RPE from workouts.

    In the Allen and Coogan book, a very reasonable substitute for an FTP test is normalized power from a hard, one hour effort from a race. This was set early in May and have yet to see number like it again. Initially, I tried to base zones off this number and it didn't take long to realize that the efforts were way too hard and unsustainable.

    After a series of other races, hard group rides and FTP heart rate efforts, I settled on a number that, I thought, held up really well for the rest of the season.

    Over the past couple of months, I started seeing IF numbers approach and exceed 1.0 and with the general sense that I was getting more fit, I had my suspicions that my FTP had been improving.

    Now, you might ask why I don't just conduct an FTP test... I've tried... and had wildly different results. Is it possible that tests themselves are a limiter for me? In the same way that I may not be a sprinter or a climber? IOW, I question the idea that large blocks of training should rest on the performance from ONE effort, when you have a series recent hard efforts to draw from.

    So I guess I have a broad philosophical question about training with power that I've struggled with since getting my PT and never really got a satisfactory answer... and secondly, would like to know if anyone else "triangulates" on their FTP level and achieved any sort of success from it.

  24. #1574
    umd
    umd is offline
    Banned umd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
    Posts
    28,343
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mattm View Post
    My 705 seems to always display wildly different power #'s than WKO - avg power is always too high to WKO's AP, usually closer to NP (does it not count zeroes by default?)

    Fwiw I have the firmware from earlier this summer, haven't upgraded to the new stuff yet. I just take all the #'s with a grain or two of salt.
    The older firmware ignores 0's, so it will have higher averages. The newer firmware has an option, but it defaults to ignore zeros. You really should upgrade to the latest, they pretty much worked out all the issues.

  25. #1575
    Making a kilometer blurry waterrockets's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin (near TX)
    My Bikes
    rkwaki's porn collection
    Posts
    25,965
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Athlete, Joe View Post
    So I've got a season's worth of data and I'm finally getting the chance to reflect on my "progress."

    Before hunkering down into base, of course it stands to reason that I should have a solid understanding of where my zones are. But it hasn't been all that easy...

    Having a little difficulty reconciling my "true" FTP from a series of data points, specifically from races, hard group rides, a professionally administered fitness test (from last spring) and general RPE from workouts.

    In the Allen and Coogan book, a very reasonable substitute for an FTP test is normalized power from a hard, one hour effort from a race. This was set early in May and have yet to see number like it again. Initially, I tried to base zones off this number and it didn't take long to realize that the efforts were way too hard and unsustainable.

    After a series of other races, hard group rides and FTP heart rate efforts, I settled on a number that, I thought, held up really well for the rest of the season.

    Over the past couple of months, I started seeing IF numbers approach and exceed 1.0 and with the general sense that I was getting more fit, I had my suspicions that my FTP had been improving.

    Now, you might ask why I don't just conduct an FTP test... I've tried... and had wildly different results. Is it possible that tests themselves are a limiter for me? In the same way that I may not be a sprinter or a climber? IOW, I question the idea that large blocks of training should rest on the performance from ONE effort, when you have a series recent hard efforts to draw from.

    So I guess I have a broad philosophical question about training with power that I've struggled with since getting my PT and never really got a satisfactory answer... and secondly, would like to know if anyone else "triangulates" on their FTP level and achieved any sort of success from it.
    This season, I've been able to estimate my FTP from my steady SST pace. Knowing that I can expect to hold ~90% FTP for ~40 minutes straight, five days in a row, I can see how it goes and get an estimate from that. If I'm able to consistently come out of SST rides with an NP of 315W, then I know I'm doing well, with my FTP at 350W or so (never been higher than 360W).

    Have you tried a MAP test yet? Get a helper to scream at you though.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •