Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > "The 33"-Road Bike Racing
Reload this Page >

SS Intervals - do you agree w/ Charmichael?

Notices
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

SS Intervals - do you agree w/ Charmichael?

Old 01-07-09, 05:43 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Local psych ward
Posts: 813
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SS Intervals - do you agree w/ Charmichael?

""don't make the mistake of riding [them] at your time trial pace" - C. Carmichael, Ultimate Ride pg. 111
dysFTP is offline  
Old 01-07-09, 05:48 PM
  #2  
Batüwü Creakcreak
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The illadelph
Posts: 20,787
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 228 Post(s)
Liked 287 Times in 160 Posts
Originally Posted by dysFTP
""don't make the mistake of riding [them] at your time trial pace" - C. Carmichael, Ultimate Ride pg. 111
Depends.
ridethecliche is offline  
Old 01-07-09, 06:23 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
What's he referring to? If you are talking about long intervals but less than 1 hr, then you should probably be at a wattage somewhat higher than ftp.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 01-07-09, 06:39 PM
  #4  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Local psych ward
Posts: 813
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
What's he referring to? If you are talking about long intervals but less than 1 hr, then you should probably be at a wattage somewhat higher than ftp.
He's referring to intervals of up to 20 min. He states that the intensity should be approx. LT-5 BPM. He specifically states that you should train slightly below LT. He says "spending too much time at your LT is too taxing and will ultimately diminish any gains".

It's basically Sweet Spot.
dysFTP is offline  
Old 01-07-09, 06:52 PM
  #5  
Batüwü Creakcreak
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The illadelph
Posts: 20,787
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 228 Post(s)
Liked 287 Times in 160 Posts
You can boost FTP up in two ways:
1) Push it up.
2) Pull it up.

#1 is usually less taxing and can be done more regularly.
#2 is more draining and it takes the body longer to recover so you can do them less often.

So usually, you can do #1's on a much more regular basis (even everyday if you do other things correctly). Thus, they might do less per interval but the quantity of them helps more than doing less of something that does more.

You're right. He's preaching SST below threshhold.
ridethecliche is offline  
Old 01-07-09, 07:07 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,917
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
According to page 110, SS = Steady State *TM by Chris*

ROFL...


I disagree with his 1:1 work/recovery ratio and that they should be no longer than 20 minutes.
wfrogge is offline  
Old 01-07-09, 07:19 PM
  #7  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Local psych ward
Posts: 813
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ridethecliche
You can boost FTP up in two ways:
1) Push it up.
2) Pull it up.

#1 is usually less taxing and can be done more regularly.
#2 is more draining and it takes the body longer to recover so you can do them less often.

So usually, you can do #1's on a much more regular basis (even everyday if you do other things correctly). Thus, they might do less per interval but the quantity of them helps more than doing less of something that does more.

You're right. He's preaching SST below threshhold.
3) Throw it up
dysFTP is offline  
Old 01-07-09, 07:42 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by dysFTP
He's referring to intervals of up to 20 min. He states that the intensity should be approx. LT-5 BPM. He specifically states that you should train slightly below LT. He says "spending too much time at your LT is too taxing and will ultimately diminish any gains".

It's basically Sweet Spot.
Everyone's got their own thing - ask three different coaches the answer to this and you'll probably get three different answers. Truth is that your body adapts to stress when you apply the stress regularly. It also depends, probably, on the "percent of potential" you are at in terms of your potential performance. For me, a second year racer and still making relatively large gains in my estimate of LT, I pull it up, so to speak, because I still have not closed in on my potential. If I were an experienced racer and my gains are more incremental, then "more of less" will probably stress the body more efficiently than "less of more".

Time constraints also probably play a role. If you have limited time to train, it is probably more beneficial to increase the intensity. For instance, I think it is Friel who stated that endurance rides of 3-5 hours are beneficial, but riding at endurance pace for 1-2 hours isn't really doing anything. You need to be at endurance pace for long periods of time, else you should increase the intensity of your rides.

But I don't know. I'm feeling my way along and it really does sound like he is making his way around to the concept of sweet spot training that Allen and Coggan introduced.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 01-07-09, 07:59 PM
  #9  
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,273

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1428 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times in 353 Posts
I've been doing the CTS program for awhile now. The way the program is set up, steady states are done at or below LT (8/10ths perceived effort).

The program also has TT intervals which are 9/10ths perceived effort.

So 2x20 efforts in the CTS program can be done just below LT (Steady states) or as hard as you can hold for the time (TT intervals)

Both have their place. There's pretty good data that doing the steady states gets you most of the advantage that doing them balls out gives you at a lower cost.

And then the TT intervals are done in the final prep phase, to really push you.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 01-07-09, 08:14 PM
  #10  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Local psych ward
Posts: 813
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh

Both have their place. There's pretty good data that doing the steady states gets you most of the advantage that doing them balls out gives you at a lower cost.

And then the TT intervals are done in the final prep phase, to really push you.
That makes sense.
dysFTP is offline  
Old 01-07-09, 08:43 PM
  #11  
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
I tend to do better by pushing FTP up than pulling it. I'm still seeing huge and consistent gains from peak to peak.

Look at the power levels table (Table 2) here. Look at the differences between training in zone 3 and zone 4. All of the same adaptations are represented in both zones. More in zone 4, but it's not like zone 3 is abandoning your threshold training. I can train sweet spot in high zone 3 for five days in a row. That's better than a day in zone 4 (for less time) followed by a day in zone 2 to recover, in my opinion.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 01-08-09, 10:07 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,917
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I do most of my winter work indoors and find it hard to hold 100% of FTP for 20 minutes because I overheat and get bored..... No need to worry about me doing SST work at 100% of FTP this winter

I have found that I can do 80-90% of FTP for 15 minutes (x4) twice a week on the trainer and recover fine the next day..... With that said I cant wait for DST to start!
wfrogge is offline  
Old 01-08-09, 10:51 AM
  #13  
bzzzz
 
fuzzthebee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 360
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
FTP is not really a steady state if you think about heart rate drift, but I can do 60+ minutes at ~90% FTP and my HR is pretty much stable.
fuzzthebee is offline  
Old 01-08-09, 11:20 AM
  #14  
My idea of fun
 
kensuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 9,920

Bikes: '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '02 Kona Lavadome, '07 Giant TCR Advanced, '07 Karate Monkey

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by dysFTP
3) Throw it up
That's my preferred method. Painful, but quick.
kensuf is offline  
Old 01-08-09, 11:21 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,917
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fuzzthebee
FTP is not really a steady state if you think about heart rate drift, but I can do 60+ minutes at ~90% FTP and my HR is pretty much stable.
FTP is power not HR (duh I know) but you should account for HR drift even at 90%
wfrogge is offline  
Old 01-08-09, 07:20 PM
  #16  
bzzzz
 
fuzzthebee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 360
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wfrogge
FTP is power not HR (duh I know) but you should account for HR drift even at 90%
I train with a PT so I don't have to account for HR drift.

However, I only have a 4 bpm difference in average HR vs max HR during a 2 x 40' at 90% FTP. The first one is 153 bpm average, 157 bpm max. The second one is 153 bpm average, 157 bpm max. I reach 153 bpm around 5.5 minutes into the each interval. The last half of the second interval actually averages 91% FTP with an average HR of 154 bpm.

That seems pretty steady to me.
fuzzthebee is offline  
Old 01-08-09, 09:07 PM
  #17  
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
I keep forgetting, what's HR again? That strap thingy that was accidentally left in my PowerTap box?

Yeah, you should try to get as many HRs as possible. You never know how many you'll burn in an attack.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 01-09-09, 03:46 AM
  #18  
bzzzz
 
fuzzthebee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 360
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I only wear mine indoors - another number to look at.
fuzzthebee is offline  
Old 01-09-09, 08:48 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,917
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fuzzthebee
I train with a PT so I don't have to account for HR drift.

However, I only have a 4 bpm difference in average HR vs max HR during a 2 x 40' at 90% FTP. The first one is 153 bpm average, 157 bpm max. The second one is 153 bpm average, 157 bpm max. I reach 153 bpm around 5.5 minutes into the each interval. The last half of the second interval actually averages 91% FTP with an average HR of 154 bpm.

That seems pretty steady to me.

Account for it as in .... expect it and its no big deal.

I havent used my HR strap in over a year.
wfrogge is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.