Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Rolls vs Brooks

  1. #1
    RGW
    RGW is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Buffalo - NY
    My Bikes
    Gunnar Roadie & Salsa Casseroll, Felt F75X
    Posts
    100
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rolls vs Brooks

    I have been using a Selle San Marco Roll saddle for the past year and a half. I bought it based on many of the reviews indicating howcomfortable the Rolls was. However I only find it moderately comfortable After about an hour, it starts to wear on me. So I'm thinking of getting a Brooks B17 again based on many of the reviews I've read on what a comfortable sadd;e the Brooks is (eventually after wearing it in!) So I'm looking fow any feedback on those who have used both a Rolls and a Brooks. Did you notice a noticable difference?

  2. #2
    Cat 666 fatallightning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    nyack, ny (yes, that one)
    Posts
    1,462
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    And this pertains to road bike racing how?
    “Oh man, it’s going to take days to kill all these people!” - jens voigt
    Current: Calfee Tetra Pro/ Tiemeyer Signature Track/ Cannondale CAADX/ Trek T1/ Giordana Capella TT
    RIP: Cervelo SLC-SL/ Salsa Campeon/ Cannondale 2.8
    SOLD: Serotta Classique Ti/ Landshark 853/ Orbea Starship/ Cannondale CAAD9/ Bianchi Pista/

  3. #3
    Senior Member socalrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Upland, CA
    My Bikes
    Litespeed Liege, Motorola Team Issue Eddy Mercxk, Surly Crosscheck Cyclocross bike, Fisher Supercaliber Mtn. Bike
    Posts
    5,002
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would look at getting a Swift, b17 Narrow or Team Pro.. There are closer in width to your Rolls than the standard B17 which is a fairly wide saddle..

  4. #4
    Mitcholo CrimsonKarter21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
    My Bikes
    2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
    Posts
    8,851
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Try a Regal first.

  5. #5
    175mm crank of love RichinPeoria's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,365
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CrimsonKarter21 View Post
    Try a Regal first.
    +1

    If you want a racing type saddle then you might want to try a Regal.
    Its more narrow and less padded than the Rolls.

    Brooks can be very uncomfortable depending on the rider.

    I have a Regal, Rolls, Brooks B17 (22 years old) and an Imperial.

    I do most of my riding on my Rolls. My old B17 is on my wet weather bike.
    Have a good day and htfu you big baby, Rich
    Quote Originally Posted by coasting View Post
    So I step away from BF for a day and this thread takes a nose dive! .....
    The only good bit is RichPeoria's yummy food pics again! Congratulations Rich; you are a king amongst fools

  6. #6
    SLJ 6/8/65-5/2/07 Walter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    SE Florida, USA aka the Treasure Coast
    Posts
    5,291
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by RichinPeoria View Post
    +1

    If you want a racing type saddle then you might want to try a Regal.
    Its more narrow and less padded than the Rolls.

    Brooks can be very uncomfortable depending on the rider.

    I have a Regal, Rolls, Brooks B17 (22 years old) and an Imperial.

    I do most of my riding on my Rolls. My old B17 is on my wet weather bike.
    That's the one place I'd be kind of worried about using a Brooks.

    I second or third or whatever the number is by nowthe Regal. I've got 3. One of them however has a slightly different shape that the other 2. Don't know why but it isn't as nice as the others. There's been a guy selling Regals on eBay for awhile now for $50 or less. I got one of the white ones with the World Champion rainbow and I'm quite happy. Stainless steel rivets though.


    “Life is not one damned thing after another. Life is one damned thing over and over.”
    Edna St. Vincent Millay

  7. #7
    Elite Fred mollusk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Edge City
    My Bikes
    2009 Spooky (cracked frame), 2006 Curtlo, 2002 Lemond (current race bike) Zurich, 1987 Serotta Colorado, 1986 Cannondale for commuting, a 1984 Cannondale on loan to my son
    Posts
    10,623
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Brooks B17 is better suited for riders that are more upright. The Brooks Pro works better for more aggressive riders that ride a lot in the drops. And the Brooks Pro offers more places to position yourself.

    For me a Brooks Pro (broken in) is super comfortable, but with a massive weight penalty. I find that a Fizik Arionne is quite similar in shape (works well in the drops and offers lots of different sitting positions) and almost as comfortable but it weighs a whole lot less.

    Of course saddles need to work well with your particular butt and everyone's is different.
    I'm the world's forgotten boy. The one who's searchin', searchin' to destroy.

  8. #8
    Mitcholo CrimsonKarter21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
    My Bikes
    2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
    Posts
    8,851
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by RichinPeoria View Post
    +1

    If you want a racing type saddle then you might want to try a Regal.
    Its more narrow and less padded than the Rolls.

    Brooks can be very uncomfortable depending on the rider.

    I have a Regal, Rolls, Brooks B17 (22 years old) and an Imperial.

    I do most of my riding on my Rolls. My old B17 is on my wet weather bike.
    Huh? It's wider, no? The Regal is 150mm in the back.

  9. #9
    175mm crank of love RichinPeoria's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,365
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CrimsonKarter21 View Post
    Huh? It's wider, no? The Regal is 150mm in the back.
    I dont have the measurements I took handy but I have had them both next to each other and the Rolls is wider and feels wider than the Regal.

    From the Nashbar site
    130mm wide 280mm long Regal
    147mm wide 278mm long Rolls
    Have a good day and htfu you big baby, Rich
    Quote Originally Posted by coasting View Post
    So I step away from BF for a day and this thread takes a nose dive! .....
    The only good bit is RichPeoria's yummy food pics again! Congratulations Rich; you are a king amongst fools

  10. #10
    starting pistol means war YMCA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    east coast
    My Bikes
    Cervelo R3
    Posts
    3,041
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by fatallightning View Post
    And this pertains to road bike racing how?
    Rolls was "the" saddle for a couple decades in racing. When I started back when, about half the peloton was using one.

    I preferred the Turbo.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •