Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > "The 33"-Road Bike Racing
Reload this Page >

Gear selection for racing

Search
Notices
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

Gear selection for racing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-09, 11:17 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
Taking your weight and 400 watts, you're going to be around 9mph on a 15% grade which will still put you below 80 rpm in a 39/25.


15% is friggin steep. It's steeper than any portion of L'Alpe de Huez for example.

I seriously doubt people in lower categories are charging up sustained 15% grades at a pace that can't be maintained spinning a 39/27 or 39/28, or a 34/25.

Note, I'm not saying that you can't race that with a 39/25 either, but what I am saying is at the power outputs you'd expect from a typical Cat 4, you're going to be lugging it up a 15% grade in a 39/25.
1+ We have races with 15% grades, but they only last a couple hundred feet at the most, and you are better off huffing it out of the saddle. Especially for bigger guys, if you can't huff it standing in a high gear, you'll be dropped. At 180lbs, it takes me way more than 400W to keep up with our best climbers on a 15% grade.

I have noticed that bigger, heavier, stronger riders favor steeper climbing gears than their lighter, less strong counterparts. I think it's simply that anyone can sit and spin and create 300W, whereas the bigger guys who have to produce much more than 300W to stay with the little guys can better produce that by standing on steeper gears.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 11:25 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tariffville, CT
Posts: 15,405

Bikes: Tsunami road bikes, Dolan DF4 track

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 102 Posts
400 watts for a kilometer at 7-9 mph (10 kph) is about 6 minutes. No way I could do 400w for 6 minutes. 300 would be stretching it.

I recall a ride earlier this year where I was sustaining 200w, under intense pressure, up a 7 or 8% grade (Palomar), and going about 4 or 5 mph. Nothing would have gotten me going faster.

New racer? Get a low gear (39x25 minimum) and go. The field will be totally blasted to pieces anyway, if the 15% grade is an accurate average. Everyone will be struggling up the stupid hills.

If I had to do a race like that, I'd look for a compact and put some really aero wheels on. At least then the time trialing while off the back would seem, well, a bit faster. In fact, that's what I used to do in hilly road races - set the bike up for time trialing. I almost made it back once, gaining back a couple minutes on a lethargic field, but I stopped at the feed zone. That's when someone said "Oh, they're like 15 seconds up the road". Grr. Of course that was the first 100km lap, and there was another 100 km lap to go. I wasn't about to do the second lap anyway.

cdr
carpediemracing is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 11:26 AM
  #28  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
Taking your weight and 400 watts, you're going to be around 9mph on a 15% grade which will still put you below 80 rpm in a 39/25.


15% is friggin steep. It's steeper than any portion of L'Alpe de Huez for example.

I seriously doubt people in lower categories are charging up sustained 15% grades at a pace that can't be maintained spinning a 39/27 or 39/28, or a 34/25.

Note, I'm not saying that you can't race that with a 39/25 either, but what I am saying is at the power outputs you'd expect from a typical Cat 4, you're going to be lugging it up a 15% grade in a 39/25.
I tend to agree with you there. In my limited experience, I'm often very comfortable spinning up hills where most around me are out of the saddle cranking up the watts.
GuyinBlue is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 11:31 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,840
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GuyinBlue
The race I'm planning for has 3,300 feet of climbing with six 1 km climbs at 15% avg gradient.

Where do you think that fits on the scale of flat to mountainy?
what race is this?
MDcatV is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 11:49 AM
  #30  
One speed: FAST !
 
fordfasterr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ft. Lauderdale FL
Posts: 3,375

Bikes: Ebay Bikes... =)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i've noticed that many people here in flat-land use 11-21/23

I use 12/23 just because.
fordfasterr is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 11:52 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by fordfasterr
i've noticed that many people here in flat-land use 11-21/23

I use 12/23 just because.
If I don't absolutely need the 25, I like the 12-23 cassette because it has an 18 cog.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 11:59 AM
  #32  
One speed: FAST !
 
fordfasterr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ft. Lauderdale FL
Posts: 3,375

Bikes: Ebay Bikes... =)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
If I don't absolutely need the 25, I like the 12-23 cassette because it has an 18 cog.
at what speed do you use the 18t cog? with a 53t cr right?
fordfasterr is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 12:38 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Posts: 9,788
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
Taking your weight and 400 watts, you're going to be around 9mph on a 15% grade which will still put you below 80 rpm in a 39/25.


15% is friggin steep. It's steeper than any portion of L'Alpe de Huez for example.

I seriously doubt people in lower categories are charging up sustained 15% grades at a pace that can't be maintained spinning a 39/27 or 39/28, or a 34/25.

Note, I'm not saying that you can't race that with a 39/25 either, but what I am saying is at the power outputs you'd expect from a typical Cat 4, you're going to be lugging it up a 15% grade in a 39/25.
I suppose, like most Cat 4s, I have an exaggerated opinion of my own awesomeness.
grolby is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 12:41 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Posts: 9,788
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Originally Posted by GuyinBlue
I tend to agree with you there. In my limited experience, I'm often very comfortable spinning up hills where most around me are out of the saddle cranking up the watts.
Technical foul - the wattage at a given grade and speed remains constant at different cadences. However, it may be easier or more efficient for your legs to produce 400 W at 90 RPM than at 70 RPM. Etc. Getting out of the saddle, if you do not change speed, does not mean you are producing more power.
grolby is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 12:49 PM
  #35  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by grolby
Technical foul - the wattage at a given grade and speed remains constant at different cadences. However, it may be easier or more efficient for your legs to produce 400 W at 90 RPM than at 70 RPM. Etc. Getting out of the saddle, if you do not change speed, does not mean you are producing more power.
Got it. Thanks.
GuyinBlue is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 04:18 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by fordfasterr
at what speed do you use the 18t cog? with a 53t cr right?
I dunno, I think it's around 20mph. All I know is that the gap between 53/17 and 53/19 is larger than most other gaps in the cassette. Graph it out and you'll see what I mean.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 04:40 PM
  #37  
Ho-Jahm
 
Hocam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 4,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by grolby
I suppose, like most Cat 4s, I have an exaggerated opinion of my own awesomeness.
The 4/5 quabbin pack seemed to start out at 5-6 watts/kg but quickly settle into 4-4.5 watts/kg. At Jiminey Peak the big climb averaged almost 4.5 for a bit under 5 minutes.
Hocam is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 05:48 PM
  #38  
fair weather cyclist
 
pjcampbell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Green Mountains
Posts: 1,368

Bikes: Colnago c50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Best combo for most people racing hilly road races in North East is a Compact with something like a 12-25.
pjcampbell is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 06:04 PM
  #39  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Anybody who thinks they know what is best for someone else is wrong.
umd is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 06:22 PM
  #40  
Ink-Stained Wretch
 
pinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Holyoke, MA
Posts: 1,731
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm enjoying racing New England with a 12-23. Almost a straight block, super smooth. A 25 comes out for races with real climbing but round here that's limited to what Battenkill and the GMSR? Maybe Fitchburg if my legs are dead on day two...
pinky is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 06:32 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I use a 11-23 here in MA, and I really don't have many problems. Granted I'm not doing any mountain races, but it works for me. And no, I'm not a lightweight climber.
roy5000x2 is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 06:44 PM
  #42  
Ho-Jahm
 
Hocam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 4,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pinky
I'm enjoying racing New England with a 12-23. Almost a straight block, super smooth. A 25 comes out for races with real climbing but round here that's limited to what Battenkill and the GMSR? Maybe Fitchburg if my legs are dead on day two...
Any idea what the deal is with the lack of races in June/July/August? Bikereg.com seems almost empty except for Maine and a few crits in CT.
Hocam is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 07:34 PM
  #43  
Ink-Stained Wretch
 
pinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Holyoke, MA
Posts: 1,731
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The build to Fitchburg, the spring road races give way to the early summer crits (and Housatonic) then you've got the 'burg, followed by either Owasco or Toona, then Workingman's, then more crits, and (hopefully) Tokeneke, Bow, Topsfield...and more
pinky is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 07:54 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Posts: 9,788
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Originally Posted by roy5000x2
I use a 11-23 here in MA, and I really don't have many problems. Granted I'm not doing any mountain races, but it works for me. And no, I'm not a lightweight climber.
I am, and my standard cassette is a 12-25. It takes all kinds. I prefer to grind it out in the saddle on climbs as much as possible, and while a 39-25 does not exactly mean that you are "sitting and spinning" on an 8%-10% grade, at least at the speeds that I and most of the people I ride with are capable of, it can make the difference between having to get out of the saddle or remaining seated.

Originally Posted by Hocam
The 4/5 quabbin pack seemed to start out at 5-6 watts/kg but quickly settle into 4-4.5 watts/kg. At Jiminey Peak the big climb averaged almost 4.5 for a bit under 5 minutes.
You are only deepening my sense of chagrin and embarrassment. Though I will submit starting a climb at 5-6 W/kg and then "settling in" to 4-4.5 W/kg is, at least for Cat 4s in April, friggin ridiculous. Of course, I say this because they dropped me.

Best combo for most people racing hilly road races in North East is a Compact with something like a 12-25.
Just to prove that there are probably as many opinions on this as there are bike racers, I strongly disagree - a 12-25 cassette with a compact crank is WAY overkill for the vast majority of races in the Northeast. I've been very content with a standard double and a 12-25, and could probably get away with a 12-23. Of course, as noted above, I AM a lightweight climber.
grolby is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 07:58 PM
  #45  
Ho-Jahm
 
Hocam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 4,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I use a 12-25 and a compact, but that's for training. Racing means I'm rarely out of the 50T so what difference does it make?

Besides, a compact is really only 1 gear lower than a 39-25 so how does it become overkill?
Hocam is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 08:18 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Posts: 9,788
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Originally Posted by Hocam
I use a 12-25 and a compact, but that's for training. Racing means I'm rarely out of the 50T so what difference does it make?

Besides, a compact is really only 1 gear lower than a 39-25 so how does it become overkill?
Actually a 34-25 is significantly lower than a 39-25. With a difference of 14.7%, it's much larger than the jump from a 25 to a 27 tooth cog (8.0%). Now, to say that it is "way overkill" may be hyperbole, but this is BF, after all. If we don't have our hyperbole, what do we have?

ETA: if we're talking about remaining in the 50T, that is of course a different story, but I thought we were talking about climbing gears, aka the wee little ring on the crank.
grolby is offline  
Old 05-15-09, 07:08 AM
  #47  
Ho-Jahm
 
Hocam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 4,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
True.
Hocam is offline  
Old 05-15-09, 12:04 PM
  #48  
negligent.
 
slynkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: White Plains, NY
Posts: 837

Bikes: a few

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i run a 50/34 with an 12-25. but, i've only raced crits so far, where i've stayed in the 50 and never used anything smaller than the 17t, i think.

for my first road race in july, i'll put on an 11-25. it's got some good descents, and the finish hill is 1.5mi, average 8%, sections up to 15%.
slynkie is offline  
Old 05-15-09, 12:10 PM
  #49  
Batüwü Creakcreak
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The illadelph
Posts: 20,791
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 160 Posts
What I said earlier, 52/36.

Choice of cassettes for everything. 11-23 for crits/fast races. 12-25 for everything, and possibly 11-28 for really hilly stuff.

I think it's the best all around combo of crankset. If you can get used to shifting in the back with the front, and dial in the front shifting.
ridethecliche is offline  
Old 05-15-09, 12:20 PM
  #50  
negligent.
 
slynkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: White Plains, NY
Posts: 837

Bikes: a few

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ridethecliche
What I said earlier, 52/36.

Choice of cassettes for everything. 11-23 for crits/fast races. 12-25 for everything, and possibly 11-28 for really hilly stuff.

I think it's the best all around combo of crankset. If you can get used to shifting in the back with the front, and dial in the front shifting.
that does sound good. if only campy made an 11-28, i'd run your 52/36 suggestion, and never take the 11-28 off. my comfortable cadence range seems to be pretty wide, so i don't think i'd mind the gaps even for a crit.
slynkie is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.