Gear selection for racing
#76
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I, for one don't like to settle for "close enough" when it comes to gearing, when there's a gear that is optimal. At 25 mph, which is a very common speed in a race or a ride, if I am in the 17 cog I am spinning at 100 RPM, if I go to the 19 at the same speed, I'm spinning at 112.
I don't know about you, but to me, a 12 rpm cadence difference is pretty huge when I'm just sitting and spinning.
The 18 cog gives a very close, smooth gear transition right at a speed that I will use all the time, so that I can maintain optimal cadence.
I can feel a huge difference in gear size and cadence between the 17 and the 19, which is why I switched cassettes to one that had an 18 also, but hey, it looks like you're not sensitive to gearing and cadence, so ride what works for you.
I don't know about you, but to me, a 12 rpm cadence difference is pretty huge when I'm just sitting and spinning.
The 18 cog gives a very close, smooth gear transition right at a speed that I will use all the time, so that I can maintain optimal cadence.
I can feel a huge difference in gear size and cadence between the 17 and the 19, which is why I switched cassettes to one that had an 18 also, but hey, it looks like you're not sensitive to gearing and cadence, so ride what works for you.
#78
Nonsense
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,918
Bikes: Affirmative
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 880 Post(s)
Liked 541 Times
in
237 Posts
I honestly don't think I've ever been in a situation where closing a gap required an 11t.
Last edited by TheKillerPenguin; 05-19-09 at 11:34 AM.
#79
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Required... maybe not, but I was doing 130 rpm already and I was pretty much at my limit since I had just been gapped at the top of the climb. Maybe I would have been able to catch back on without (spinning a lower gear even faster) it but at the time I certainly felt that if I didn't have it that would have been it right there. That allowed me to make the front part of the split in the field whereas many people right behind me did not. Unfortunately I got popped on the climb on the next lap and suffered to the finish mostly by myself. I was already in an aero tuck trying to catch up but was not gaining on the field, pedaling allowed me to bump my speed up fast enough to make it and 130rpm is not exactly mashing. I hit 52 on that descent, and for every other lap I don't think I went over 45.
#80
Batüwü Creakcreak
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The illadelph
Posts: 20,791
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
160 Posts
That sounds like it's just too long a shift for my taste. Yes, I know, it's the same tooth difference as you get on a regular compact crank, but that's a big part of what I don't like about compact cranks - in fact, it's the biggest reason. 36/50 makes sense to me, but any more is really pushing it. I'm basically a big fan of the standard double, even on reasonably hilly courses.
You can anticipate the shift when you need to shift to the little ring, and you can drop a few gears in the back. Everyone makes such a huge deal of this, but I never saw an issue on the 50/34 setup I raced and trained with last year.
In crits, you never shift up in front so no issues there.
In a road race, you'll be able to see where the hills are so you can anticipate the climbs.
The tooth difference is pretty much a moot point since you can shift in a split second and make up for it...
#83
Nonsense
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,918
Bikes: Affirmative
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 880 Post(s)
Liked 541 Times
in
237 Posts
Required... maybe not, but I was doing 130 rpm already and I was pretty much at my limit since I had just been gapped at the top of the climb. Maybe I would have been able to catch back on without (spinning a lower gear even faster) it but at the time I certainly felt that if I didn't have it that would have been it right there. That allowed me to make the front part of the split in the field whereas many people right behind me did not. Unfortunately I got popped on the climb on the next lap and suffered to the finish mostly by myself. I was already in an aero tuck trying to catch up but was not gaining on the field, pedaling allowed me to bump my speed up fast enough to make it and 130rpm is not exactly mashing. I hit 52 on that descent, and for every other lap I don't think I went over 45.
#84
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Some guys in the 3s did it but most everyone shifted.
Half the lap was uphill with increasing grade so every lap from the bottom corner to the top was about a minute at ~6w/kg. Every lap for me was little ring from around the start/finish to the top of the climb then big ring from the top corner down the back straight, down the descent, through the bottom corner, accelerate hard out of the bottom corner, slight lull around the start/finish, shift to little ring, repeat... I was actually feeling pretty good until the damn cramp, power climbing is something I am relatively good at. If I had a compact with a lower cassette maybe I would have done the whole thing in my big ring but the shifting wasn't a problem until after I cramped and lost the pack anyway.
Edit: note that this is not the same race as the one I am talking about with KP. This was a crit on Saturday and that was a circuit on Sunday, although they are both part of the same stage race.
Edit2: yeah, about 20 seconds for the steep part of the climb from corner to corner. I did about 500W average (7.7W/kg) with 700W+ accelerations pretty much every lap. That was a hard crit course. Every field that day was completely shattered.
Last edited by umd; 05-19-09 at 12:06 PM.
#85
Batüwü Creakcreak
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The illadelph
Posts: 20,791
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
160 Posts
Yeah, but still, I don't think you'd lose out too much if you had a 52/36 setup. If it was dialed in and with a dog fang you'd be golden.
I use a dog fang on my SRM for multiple reasons, but I still get 'chain slip' when I'm shifting to the little ring and am cross chained. The chain skates on the little ring for a few seconds at times. I guess that's because of the cheap 9/10 speed rings. I'll get god chainrings soon. Maybe I'll throw the ones from my 105 crank on the SRM because I'm having a really hard time selling that crankset.
What I'd get for that crankset would probably be the same as I'd pay for a new set of rings, so I might as well just use them, eh?
I use a dog fang on my SRM for multiple reasons, but I still get 'chain slip' when I'm shifting to the little ring and am cross chained. The chain skates on the little ring for a few seconds at times. I guess that's because of the cheap 9/10 speed rings. I'll get god chainrings soon. Maybe I'll throw the ones from my 105 crank on the SRM because I'm having a really hard time selling that crankset.
What I'd get for that crankset would probably be the same as I'd pay for a new set of rings, so I might as well just use them, eh?
#86
Senior Member
My point is that if you jump 17 to 19 and skip the 18 or jump 16 to 18 and skip the 17 you still have the same jump at some point. There is nothing magical about the 18 that makes it any better to have or lose than the 16 or 17. Unless you have a "corncob" you are going to have a 2T jump somewhere and you are going to have to sacrifice some optimum cadence regardless.
Yes, you can "get away" with just about anything, heck just ride a fixie, then you will have to mash or over spin most of the time. But the point of multispeed derailer gears is to have the right gear all the time.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
#88
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I guess that is where we will have to agree to disagree.
#89
Rice Baker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: socal
Posts: 566
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Having a broad "powerband" is really a strength in racing. I've never heard anyone complain about gaps in gearing after they were dropped. The 18t is good for training, but I would rarely use it in races (thats what we're talking about here, right?)
#90
Senior Member
Eh. Tempest in a teapot. If you are always on the flat and racing a standard crank, it makes little sense to carry an 11, 25/26 tooth cog - you'll never use them. 11 is too high for all but the pro sprinters, and a 25/26 is too low. If you have climbs and descents, then the 11 (for the descents), 25/26 (for the climbs) make sense again.
There is a gap in the ratios between 15 and 17, and another between 17 and 19. Just a fact. Graph it out if you don't believe me. Efficiency is the name of the game, and keeping a constant cadence plays towards efficiency. If you don't need the extremes of the cassette, then ditch those gears and put them somewhere in the middle.
I was thinking about this the other day. The ideal two cassettes for racing would be a 12-23 for flat races and an 11-25 for hilly. A 12-25 is the "do everything" cassette, with the bottom half optimized for flat and the upper half for climbing.
There is a gap in the ratios between 15 and 17, and another between 17 and 19. Just a fact. Graph it out if you don't believe me. Efficiency is the name of the game, and keeping a constant cadence plays towards efficiency. If you don't need the extremes of the cassette, then ditch those gears and put them somewhere in the middle.
I was thinking about this the other day. The ideal two cassettes for racing would be a 12-23 for flat races and an 11-25 for hilly. A 12-25 is the "do everything" cassette, with the bottom half optimized for flat and the upper half for climbing.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#91
starting pistol means war
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,150
Bikes: Cervelo R3
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I sure haven't and I guarantee I've been in much faster races than most posters on this board.
Learn the art of pedaling and large gear ratios become less useful in anything below ProTour.
#92
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
YMCA, not being argumentative, but what would you recommend I should have done in the situation I decscribed a few posts ago?
#93
starting pistol means war
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,150
Bikes: Cervelo R3
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Tuck
Was not many years ago, Pro's were using top gears of 52x13, or sometimes a 12. And the speeds they were hitting tended to be much higher than what any local amateur race is hitting nowadays. It was all about souplesse.
If I go over 45mph, I'm not pedaling, so my 50x12 is plenty.
135rpms on 50x12 is 45mph, no big deal turning rpm's like that unless your saddle is too high
#94
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I was tucked. Not the hanging off the front of the bike tuck that some guys do, I'm not comfortable with that. Maybe that's the solution, but as tucked as I was comfortable with I only got up to about 45 and I needed to go faster than that if I was going to catch the group.
I probably could have spun a 53x12 to have gotten up to speed. Of course if I wasn't getting dropped in the first place it would not have been an issue...
I probably could have spun a 53x12 to have gotten up to speed. Of course if I wasn't getting dropped in the first place it would not have been an issue...
#95
Senior Member
You don't ride around 25 mph in a race at aboput 100 rpm? You wouldn't downshift to that gear before a turn, then get on it while you are still in the saddle and accelerate out of the corner in it?
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
#96
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#97
starting pistol means war
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,150
Bikes: Cervelo R3
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#98
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 287
Bikes: '07 Excalibur, '08 Anthem 1, and some others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I loves me my 11-26/compact. Never gotta change gears out or think about it before a race; I'm covered. (I don't do crits tho; I road race on a bi-weekly basis.)
1. I like to train on the gears I'm gonna race, and there's some pretty steep hills around here, like 8 mph @ 5W/kg for 25 min.
2. I love it so much I won't get a quarq until they finally intro the compact version. I figure descending's mostly about positioning/skill and I produce well below 80% of a pro's power output, so why bother with the tall end. Looking back, I've found some >140rpm pedaling sessions on downhills, but don't remember them in particular.
3. Managed to catch the pack with a several minute deficit on a downhill/flat after a crash with this gearing. But I'm a wuss and clearly need a skirt.
1. I like to train on the gears I'm gonna race, and there's some pretty steep hills around here, like 8 mph @ 5W/kg for 25 min.
2. I love it so much I won't get a quarq until they finally intro the compact version. I figure descending's mostly about positioning/skill and I produce well below 80% of a pro's power output, so why bother with the tall end. Looking back, I've found some >140rpm pedaling sessions on downhills, but don't remember them in particular.
3. Managed to catch the pack with a several minute deficit on a downhill/flat after a crash with this gearing. But I'm a wuss and clearly need a skirt.