Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 58
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    525
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    LSD Makes a Comeback?

    "The available evidence suggests that combining large volumes of low-intensity training with careful use of high-intensity interval training throughout the annual training cycle is the best practice model for development of endurance performance."

    http://sportsci.org/2009/ss.pdf

    Lydiard was wrong, Leary was right? LSD is back in vogue?

    This is going to make for a great BF food fight...

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    2009 Giant TCR Advanced 1, 2008 Jamis Quest
    Posts
    123
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The argument (as I've heard it) isn't that LSD doesn't work, but rather that if you don't have 30 hours/week like most non-pros with jobs, then the hours you do have are better spent on SST and threshold work.

    The article abstract sort of sets up a straw man in this regard. I don't think most people here would actually claim that "brief, high-intensity interval work is the only form of training necessary for performance optimization" as it says.

  3. #3
    Senior Member SteelerHoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    229
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    don't see any reason for a catfight. i don't think LSD (long steady distance) was ever out of vogue, except for among time limited amateur cyclists. if you have almost unlimited time to train (e.g. Pro), the LSD then progression to intensity is just about the only way to optimally train for long pro tour or pro continental length races.

    for the rest of us mortals with normal time constraints i think the reason we can't / don't dedicate as much time to LSD as would be optimal is because given a limited training schedule (and honestly limited length races) the best way to maximize time in the saddle is to modify the traditional LSD load before intensity progression. that being said, we would be faster / stronger cyclists if we could follow the LSD progression.

    for me, it seems the key is difference between what fits best for an amateur's lifestyle and race type vs. what has been proven to work at the highest levels (lots of early LSD and the luxury of 25+ hour training weeks! )

    i'm sure we'll hear about cat 1 and 2 guys that people know who do just fine on x amount of limited hours. but ask how they would fare in (and train for) higher level races longer than local level races and i imagine you'd hear them mention how their training regimen would be different, longer and LSD based.
    Steeler football is 60 minutes!! - Mike Tomlin

    Team racing and training blog: bbcracer.wordpress.com

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    525
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteelerHoo View Post
    don't see any reason for a catfight. i don't think LSD (long steady distance) was ever out of vogue, except for among time limited amateur cyclists. if you have almost unlimited time to train (e.g. Pro), the LSD then progression to intensity is just about the only way to optimally train for long pro tour or pro continental length races.

    for the rest of us mortals with normal time constraints i think the reason we can't / don't dedicate as much time to LSD as would be optimal is because given a limited training schedule (and honestly limited length races) the best way to maximize time in the saddle is to modify the traditional LSD load before intensity progression. that being said, we would be faster / stronger cyclists if we could follow the LSD progression.

    for me, it seems the key is difference between what fits best for an amateur's lifestyle and race type vs. what has been proven to work at the highest levels (lots of early LSD and the luxury of 25+ hour training weeks! )

    i'm sure we'll hear about cat 1 and 2 guys that people know who do just fine on x amount of limited hours. but ask how they would fare in (and train for) higher level races longer than local level races and i imagine you'd hear them mention how their training regimen would be different, longer and LSD based.
    With the rise of the SST movement it has become fashionable to tag Endurance, or zone 2 rides in Coggan's scheme, as "junk" miles. So even those that have sufficient time to train, say 12-15 hours on order per week, will sometimes say riding z2 is a waste of time.

    I think the "cat fight" begins when someone says that the average amateur would be better served riding the prescribed 80/20 mix of z2/HIT rather than riding predominantly > z3 for most of their training.

    While I haven't read the entire article cover to cover, as I read the exec summary and conclusions at the end, it seemed as though the authors weren't just advocating 80/20 for pros and elite amateurs.
    Last edited by LT Intolerant; 11-12-09 at 08:17 AM. Reason: spelling

  5. #5
    部門ニ/自転車オタク NomadVW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Yuma, AZ
    My Bikes
    2005 Specialized Roubaix Elite, 2005 Specialized FSR XC Comp, 2008 Blue T16, 2009 Blue RC8, Fetish Cycles Road Bike
    Posts
    3,172
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't think LSD and SST are mutually exclusive. That being said, I think LSD has a huge advantage over the non-LSD methods. It's called "base longevity." Or.. how long does the bottom end last. In PMC/power training terms, I think it should be the #1 modifier to the CTL time constant.
    Envision, Energize, Enable

  6. #6
    zone 2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    590
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So my last three weeks of z2 have been wasted? Nooooo!!! Well, I've made a plan through Friel's Bible and I'm stickin' to it, just to see how it goes.

  7. #7
    Senior Member SteelerHoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    229
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LorenzoNF View Post
    So my last three weeks of z2 have been wasted? Nooooo!!! Well, I've made a plan through Friel's Bible and I'm stickin' to it, just to see how it goes.
    LOL, you and me both! as a 12-15 hour per week guy, my last 2 months of LSD have been wasted! my coach is wrong, he's a heretic, time to convert and join the "SST Movement" 11 (now 12) guys on bikeforums can't be wrong
    Steeler football is 60 minutes!! - Mike Tomlin

    Team racing and training blog: bbcracer.wordpress.com

  8. #8
    Writin' stuff ZeCanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    3,779
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think the primary issue with LSD for the average amateur, training less than 12-15 hrs/week, is they forget about the L and D and just go S.

    In other words, a LSD schedule requires LONG DISTANCE days in order to force the desired adaptation. Going out for 2 hours at true LSD pace is completely useless, unless you're in a nearly untrained state. That same pace for 4-6 hrs can produce the kind of fatigue necessary of adaptation. Hence the trend towards SST type work for athletes with those kind of time constraints.

    I spend a lot of time at LSD pace in November/December/beginning of January, but all those rides are 4+ hrs, and are part of a 18-25hr/week schedule. If I can't get that much time in, I'm more likely to hit a light tempo or even low SST pace for the duration.

    2 hrs of LSD is a recovery ride in my book, not a training ride. Then again, I do fall into the 'elite amateur' category, so my races will tend to be longer than most on this board.
    Velo Magazine/VeloNews.com tech guy get in touch or hit me on the tweeter @CaleyFretz

  9. #9
    部門ニ/自転車オタク NomadVW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Yuma, AZ
    My Bikes
    2005 Specialized Roubaix Elite, 2005 Specialized FSR XC Comp, 2008 Blue T16, 2009 Blue RC8, Fetish Cycles Road Bike
    Posts
    3,172
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^^^
    That, and I don't fall into the "elite amateur" category.
    Envision, Energize, Enable

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    525
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LorenzoNF View Post
    So my last three weeks of z2 have been wasted? Nooooo!!! Well, I've made a plan through Friel's Bible and I'm stickin' to it, just to see how it goes.
    I think the good news is that based on this new study your approach is validated.

  11. #11
    Senior Member SteelerHoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    229
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ZeCanon, Boom! +1
    Steeler football is 60 minutes!! - Mike Tomlin

    Team racing and training blog: bbcracer.wordpress.com

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    525
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ZeCanon View Post
    I think the primary issue with LSD for the average amateur, training less than 12-15 hrs/week, is they forget about the L and D and just go S.

    In other words, a LSD schedule requires LONG DISTANCE days in order to force the desired adaptation. Going out for 2 hours at true LSD pace is completely useless, unless you're in a nearly untrained state. That same pace for 4-6 hrs can produce the kind of fatigue necessary of adaptation. Hence the trend towards SST type work for athletes with those kind of time constraints.

    I spend a lot of time at LSD pace in November/December/beginning of January, but all those rides are 4+ hrs, and are part of a 18-25hr/week schedule. If I can't get that much time in, I'm more likely to hit a light tempo or even low SST pace for the duration.

    2 hrs of LSD is a recovery ride in my book, not a training ride. Then again, I do fall into the 'elite amateur' category, so my races will tend to be longer than most on this board
    Hmm, not sure I see much LSD these days amongst amateurs based on my experiences racing/riding in NCal and SCal. Most cyclists that I observe get their "volume" through fast group rides (e.g., Spectrum Ride in NCAL or the Simi Ride in SCal), which rarely fall into the category of LSD, or Z2. IME most riders who put in moderate volume weeks (10-15 hours) probably ride too hard, with long 3-4 hour group rides at race-like intensities being the norm pretty much year round. So I see them going long distances very fast, not slow

    Insofar as having to go for a long duration, =>4 hours to see adaptation I don't know if that's necessarily the case. Wouldn't it depend on where your current fitness baseline is?

    What's interesting about the study is the authors say (on p. 46) that non-elite athletes could benefit from an 80/20, LSD/HIT program too. My guess is that because when you go hard you are able to go really hard because you're fresh, and when you go long and slow you can overload appropriately based on your current baseline of fitness and see adaptation.

  13. #13
    Writin' stuff ZeCanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    3,779
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LT Intolerant View Post

    Insofar as having to go for a long duration, =>4 hours to see adaptation I don't know if that's necessarily the case. Wouldn't it depend on where your current fitness baseline is?
    This is the racing forum, I would expect that virtually everyone could do 2 hrs at LSD pace and feel just fine. Maybe 4 is high for some, but the point is that you need to ride long enough to put stress on your body, or else there is no point in walking out the door.

    Agreed on the group rides - I participate in those as well. However, I still get plenty of long, low intensity days in during the fall and early winter. LSD has it's place for those riding lots of hours, if only because riding 25 hours of tempo+ per week would result in a seriously dead cyclist pretty quickly.
    Velo Magazine/VeloNews.com tech guy get in touch or hit me on the tweeter @CaleyFretz

  14. #14
    gmt Grumpy McTrumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Binghamton, NY
    Posts
    11,906
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    was this thread precipitated by the similar thread on Google Wattage?

    The reason I am asking is because there seems to be a discrepancy about whether people are applying these training plans to :

    a. the season as a whole

    b. the off-season "base" period (meaning NOW)

    I think we need to establish that part first before going further.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    525
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy View Post
    was this thread precipitated by the similar thread on Google Wattage?

    The reason I am asking is because there seems to be a discrepancy about whether people are applying these training plans to :

    a. the season as a whole

    b. the off-season "base" period (meaning NOW)

    I think we need to establish that part first before going further.
    I'm not sure why its relevant but yes, I first caught wind of the study on the Wattage Forum. Also, why is it important to put this in the context of base vs. other times of the year before "going further"?

  16. #16
    gmt Grumpy McTrumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Binghamton, NY
    Posts
    11,906
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    primarily because of the tendency for athletes to peak early when doing larger quantities of higher-intensity training. For reasons which seem self-evident, I personally would not want to peak in February. Hence, the idea of a steady diet of low-intensity higher-duration seems very applicable to the off-season.

    It also correlates to the somewhat common belief that FTP gains made by "pushing up" (L4 intervals) may take longer to establish, but would result in a more stable change than those gains made by "pulling up" (L5 intervals and anaerobic).

    Even with a somewhat regular application of L4 intervals, it seems to me that the base period should consist of a larger amount of low-intensity hours.

  17. #17
    Glimmers of form esammuli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Escondido, CA
    My Bikes
    Cannondale SystemSix 3, Specialized Stumpjumper M4 Comp
    Posts
    1,542
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy View Post
    was this thread precipitated by the similar thread on Google Wattage?

    The reason I am asking is because there seems to be a discrepancy about whether people are applying these training plans to :

    a. the season as a whole

    b. the off-season "base" period (meaning NOW)

    I think we need to establish that part first before going further.
    There was a line in the study claiming that 80-20 is applicable for the whole season. I believe that the type of high intensity efforts change as the season progresses.

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    525
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy View Post
    primarily because of the tendency for athletes to peak early when doing larger quantities of higher-intensity training. For reasons which seem self-evident, I personally would not want to peak in February. Hence, the idea of a steady diet of low-intensity higher-duration seems very applicable to the off-season.

    It also correlates to the somewhat common belief that FTP gains made by "pushing up" (L4 intervals) may take longer to establish, but would result in a more stable change than those gains made by "pulling up" (L5 intervals and anaerobic).

    Even with a somewhat regular application of L4 intervals, it seems to me that the base period should consist of a larger amount of low-intensity hours.
    One of the findings was that there was no demonstrable increase in power at vo2 when cyclists (Spanish U23 elites) shifted from a lower volume 80/20 program in the winter, to a higher volume, slightly higher intensity program in the spring. So insofar as "peaking" early was concerned that wasn't the case, despite the fact that the riders felt qualitatively fitter in the spring.

    In regards to pushed-up FTP being more stable than pulled-up FTP I'm not sure what you mean.

    Last, if I'm reading your third point correctly it seems as though you are validating based on your experience what the study put forward. But again it sounds like the authors are advocating the 80/20 approach year round, not just for base.

  19. #19
    gmt Grumpy McTrumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Binghamton, NY
    Posts
    11,906
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LT Intolerant View Post

    In regards to pushed-up FTP being more stable than pulled-up FTP I'm not sure what you mean.
    Wattage has quite a lot of discussion on the matter. You might have to be creative with search terms though.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    525
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy View Post
    Wattage has quite a lot of discussion on the matter. You might have to be creative with search terms though.
    I'm quite familiar w both approaches (push vs pull). I guess what I'm trying to understand is how/where your comment regarding the two approaches fits in regards to the findings of the study. Sorry, it may be that I'm a bit thick, but I missed your point.

  21. #21
    Pedalphile
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    258
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wouldn't draw any conclusions since the study's sample size is too small.

  22. #22
    Peloton Dog patentcad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Chester, NY
    My Bikes
    2013 Scott Foil, 2009 Scott Addict R2, 2008 Cervelo P3 TT bike, 2008 Motobecane Fly Ti Hard Tail MTB
    Posts
    55,931
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    You guys don't ever just STFU and ride your bikes, do you?

  23. #23
    zone 2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    590
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by patentcad View Post
    You guys don't ever just STFU and ride your bikes, do you?
    Look where that's got ya.

  24. #24
    . botto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    40,335
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LT Intolerant View Post
    LSD Makes a Comeback?
    worked for dock ellis.

  25. #25
    Wheelsuck Fat Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,159
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by botto View Post
    touchdown!!!!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •