Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > "The 33"-Road Bike Racing
Reload this Page >

Newbie Road Frame Question

Search
Notices
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

Newbie Road Frame Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-10, 07:34 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 52

Bikes: No name fixie and a Fuji track

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Newbie Road Frame Question

Hello All,

So this hipster (if I admit it, its not so bad, right?) wants to make the jump from fixed gear commuting/alleycat racing to doing a little cat 5 just-finish-the-race road cycling. I tried track racing, but that oval gets boring pretty quick.

Now, I don't have a road bike and therein lies my question. Instead of dropping a bunch of money on a new bike for road racing that I don't know if I'll love, I want to build up a classic lightweight steel frame (70's or 80's) with relatively new components. My LBS says this isn't a problem aside from long reach brakes and seat stay spacing.

Is this a bad idea for a person getting into road racing? These frames worked for a long time back in the day, why not today? I just figure if I didn't like racing then I'd still have a sweet classic bike to ride around. If I did like racing, I could upgrade later

Any opinions?

Thanks
Vinylisbest is offline  
Old 05-28-10, 07:37 AM
  #2  
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Vinylisbest
Hello All,

So this hipster (if I admit it, its not so bad, right?) wants to make the jump from fixed gear commuting/alleycat racing to doing a little cat 5 just-finish-the-race road cycling. I tried track racing, but that oval gets boring pretty quick.

Now, I don't have a road bike and therein lies my question. Instead of dropping a bunch of money on a new bike for road racing that I don't know if I'll love, I want to build up a classic lightweight steel frame (70's or 80's) with relatively new components. My LBS says this isn't a problem aside from long reach brakes and seat stay spacing.

Is this a bad idea for a person getting into road racing? These frames worked for a long time back in the day, why not today? I just figure if I didn't like racing then I'd still have a sweet classic bike to ride around. If I did like racing, I could upgrade later

Any opinions?

Thanks
This probably belongs in the vintage forum, regarding specifics of using an older frame, so post there for those questions.

Regarding the racing, yeah, any road bike that works well is going to be fine to get your racing career going. An old steel bike won't hold you back much on flat courses until maybe the P/1/2 level racing, and probably not much there either.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 05-28-10, 07:37 AM
  #3  
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Vinylisbest
Hello All,

So this hipster (if I admit it, its not so bad, right?) wants to make the jump from fixed gear commuting/alleycat racing to doing a little cat 5 just-finish-the-race road cycling. I tried track racing, but that oval gets boring pretty quick.

Now, I don't have a road bike and therein lies my question. Instead of dropping a bunch of money on a new bike for road racing that I don't know if I'll love, I want to build up a classic lightweight steel frame (70's or 80's) with relatively new components. My LBS says this isn't a problem aside from long reach brakes and seat stay spacing.

Is this a bad idea for a person getting into road racing? These frames worked for a long time back in the day, why not today? I just figure if I didn't like racing then I'd still have a sweet classic bike to ride around. If I did like racing, I could upgrade later

Any opinions?

Thanks
This probably belongs in the vintage forum, regarding specifics of using an older frame, so post there for those questions.

Regarding the racing, yeah, any road bike that works well is going to be fine to get your racing career going. An old steel bike won't hold you back much on flat courses until maybe the P/1/2 level racing, and probably not much there either.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 05-28-10, 07:58 AM
  #4  
VeloSIRraptor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Deschutes
Posts: 4,585
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
possible - yes.
Various people on this forum including me have raced steel bikes with no problems at all.

If you get a groupset with integrated shifters/brake levers and keep it adjusted correctly - you'll be just fine.
The legs are the issue, the bike isn't.

Best of luck!
Hida Yanra is offline  
Old 05-28-10, 08:07 AM
  #5  
Writin' stuff
 
ZeCanon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Durango, CO
Posts: 3,784
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times in 4 Posts
You sound a lot like a buddy of mine: https://bikefag.wordpress.com/

Read through it, you might get some ideas. Or shoot him a message. He's stuck between that interesting hipster world and the bike racer world.
ZeCanon is offline  
Old 05-28-10, 08:49 AM
  #6  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ZeCanon
You sound a lot like a buddy of mine: https://bikefag.wordpress.com/.
I just spent a lot of time there... interesting blog.
umd is offline  
Old 05-28-10, 08:52 AM
  #7  
Bulldozer
 
GirlAnachronism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Agreed, as long as it works, just about any bike will get you started.

Fair warning though--this sport is crazy addicting and you might be surprised at how much you love it. Your story fits my own cycling history exactly (hipster d-bag running around the city on a fixed gear, spent a little time at the track, eventually picked up a cheapish road bike).

I bought my road bike to get into shape for the track, and literally have not ridden my track bikes even once since I discovered the joys of having gears. Then I thought I'd just try out a few local races here and there to see if it was any fun, and have raced every single weekend since that first one and am now certifiably addicted.

Welcome, and enjoy your new brakes and gears
GirlAnachronism is offline  
Old 05-28-10, 08:54 AM
  #8  
Writin' stuff
 
ZeCanon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Durango, CO
Posts: 3,784
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times in 4 Posts
Yeah he's a cool guy. Former smoker (among other things), now completely clean. Got into riding with the CSU team. Stopped smoking that February (a few years ago), and won his first C race at the very end of the same season.

Great writer too.
ZeCanon is offline  
Old 05-28-10, 09:27 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 52

Bikes: No name fixie and a Fuji track

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the responses guys. I read bikefags blog. Funny, I used to grow up in Lawrence, KS. So I know those hills that Sam kid is talking about.

Well, thanks for not laughing at me. I'll see what the bank has in store (i.e. how much my wife will let me spend on yet another bike) and start reading up on race rules and such.
Vinylisbest is offline  
Old 06-01-10, 04:06 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Posts: 1,990

Bikes: Dawes Kalahari, Puch Prima Super Sport, Graham Weigh 853

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I think your plan is a good one. Btw, not all older racing frames had long reach brakes, quite a few were short reach. If you are planning on changing the brakes, you do need to check the front fork to see whether it accepts a recessed allen nut or a bolt.

I race a mid-80's Marinoni with more modern parts last summer and loved it. Unfortunately, I had to give it back, otherwise I would still be racing it. Superb bike!

(p.s. search ebay for Columbus SL and SLX as a quick way of finding nice frames)
acorn_user is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 08:59 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 52

Bikes: No name fixie and a Fuji track

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What do you guys think about these carbon/aluminum lugged composit frames. I've actually seen a few, even complete bikes, for around 500 on Ebay. Were they just a precursor to full carbon frames?
Vinylisbest is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 09:06 AM
  #12  
gmt
 
Grumpy McTrumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 12,509
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
there was a kid racing KSR in the P12 who rode an IF steel frame. No problem racing.
Grumpy McTrumpy is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 09:50 AM
  #13  
Tiocfáidh ár Lá
 
jfmckenna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The edge of b#
Posts: 5,475

Bikes: A whole bunch-a bikes.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 460 Post(s)
Liked 123 Times in 76 Posts
The thing is you may find it actually more expensive to take this route rather then just getting an entry level package. I took that route and bought a cheap Leader bike to learn on. After that frame was toasted I got a new one and moved the parts and wheels over to the new frame and went further to putting those parts on a cross bike.

So you may want to look into it. I'm one that likes to keep the vintage vintage though. And there is nothing wrong with racing a vintage bike as is either.
jfmckenna is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 11:44 AM
  #14  
nom nom nom
 
Frunkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,096

Bikes: Lemond Tete de Course, Slingshot DDX, Fuji Track Pro, Surly Steamroller

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ZeCanon
You sound a lot like a buddy of mine: https://bikefag.wordpress.com/

Read through it, you might get some ideas. Or shoot him a message. He's stuck between that interesting hipster world and the bike racer world.
The great Sheldeeny isn't racing anymore? Thats kind of a bummer.
Frunkin is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 11:54 AM
  #15  
VeloSIRraptor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Deschutes
Posts: 4,585
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Vinylisbest
What do you guys think about these carbon/aluminum lugged composit frames. I've actually seen a few, even complete bikes, for around 500 on Ebay. Were they just a precursor to full carbon frames?
you know, they seem to work just fine.
I'm racing one right now, and i have another one in the basement to build up if this one dies.

i have no complaints.
Hida Yanra is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 12:04 PM
  #16  
VeloSIRraptor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Deschutes
Posts: 4,585
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
at the moment my stable looks like:

2005 Raleigh Prestige (carbon w/ alum lugs, carbon cannondale premium fork, 9s - Great bike, races just fine)
2010 Raleigh Record Ace (Steel w/ lugs, steel fork, 9s - another great bike, races quite well)

unbuilt framesets:
2005 Raleigh Prestige (carbon w/ alum lugs, carbon specialized premium fork - in case the first one dies in a wreck)

previous to this, I raced a low-end aluminum Specialized Allez - the important part isn't what the bike is made of, it is what your legs are made of. If you want to race on an older steel bike, an older alum bike, a bonded bike.... whatever...
get started racing, everything else will sort itself out.

I don't know about where you are, but around here you can get a fully functional 9s groupset for under 300, PM me if you are having trouble getting a build off the ground, I may be able to help.
Hida Yanra is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 12:26 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
ericm979's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains
Posts: 6,169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
If you find a deal on an 80s steel frame and parts, that would be fine. Old stuff is certainly raceable. But modern bikes have better (dual pivot) brakes and integrated shifters. The brakes work better (so your hands don't hurt on long twisty descents) and the shifters mean you don't have to take a hand off the bars to shift. That's beneficial in a tight pack and on twisty roads.

If you can find a cheap road bike (aluminium and crabon is fine, as is all aluminium) that would arguably make for a better racing bike and a better training bike as you could spend less time wrenching and more time riding.
ericm979 is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 12:48 PM
  #18  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,386
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,687 Times in 2,510 Posts
you can occasionally find a deal on an old racing bike. Collectors are starting to drive up prices though. New parts will generally fit right on them, at least my 1980 racing bike fit all new parts with only a small tug on the chainstays to go from 126 spacing to 130. Newer bikes are a little lighter, probably will not make much difference in your early racing. As others have said, you might be better off with a new bike, my LBS had a very raceable aluminum bike for around $700 on clearance.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 01:18 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
mike868y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 9,284
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 248 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
As long as it fits, and functions well and isn't more than 25lbs, the bike is really very important in races. I've beaten guys on nicer bikes, but I've also been beaten by guys on POS bikes. The biggest thing is that it is functionally sound.
mike868y is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 04:34 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 52

Bikes: No name fixie and a Fuji track

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What About the Specialized Allez Steel? New, Steel, modern components (Shimano 2300). It would at least get me racing out of my fixed gear, and if I didn't like racing, I didn't drop much and have a fun steel road bike to run around.

https://www.specialized.com/us/en/bc/...45678&eid=4350

Anybody had experience with this bike?
Vinylisbest is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 10:54 PM
  #21  
VeloSIRraptor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Deschutes
Posts: 4,585
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
yep - that's a perfectly decent bike... the geometry is good and i've heard good things about it.
again - basically anything will work for this.
Hida Yanra is offline  
Old 06-03-10, 07:54 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 52

Bikes: No name fixie and a Fuji track

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for all the replies guys. Sounds like the allez steel just might be my ride!
Vinylisbest is offline  
Old 06-03-10, 08:44 AM
  #23  
Tiocfáidh ár Lá
 
jfmckenna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The edge of b#
Posts: 5,475

Bikes: A whole bunch-a bikes.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 460 Post(s)
Liked 123 Times in 76 Posts
Originally Posted by ericm979
and the shifters mean you don't have to take a hand off the bars to shift. That's beneficial in a tight pack and on twisty roads.

.
I never buy that argument. Don't you eat and drink in the field? That's far more dangerous then a quick shift. Don't get me wrong I love STI but I've raced on DT's just fine and I still see people today occasionally out there with them.
jfmckenna is offline  
Old 06-03-10, 01:34 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
ericm979's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains
Posts: 6,169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I raced with DT shifters back in the day. I practiced at it until I was really good at it- I could make lightning fast shifts and double shift the front and rear at the same time.

Integrated shifters are way better. Yes, like I pointed out earlier, you can race with DT shifters, but with integrated shifters you spend less thought on shifting, planning your shifts and deciding what gear to be in and more on racing.
ericm979 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tom Stormcrowe
Cyclocross Racing
3
09-20-14 07:50 PM
wsuhoops1000
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing
57
06-05-13 07:09 PM
Tom Stormcrowe
Mountain Bike Racing
2
01-21-13 10:05 AM
Tom Stormcrowe
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing
11
09-19-11 03:36 PM
Tom Stormcrowe
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
0
06-21-11 02:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.