Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-29-14, 11:08 AM   #1251
Flatballer
No matches
 
Flatballer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Bikes: two wheeled ones
Posts: 10,680
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
And if you like math, and assume bitcoin can somehow take over the world, you can figure out what each bitcoin would have to be worth. There's approximately $70 trillion US dollars worth of "money" in the world today. If you spread that over 21 million bitcoins each bitcoin is worth around $3.5 million. Makes it a pretty good bargain at $1000.
Flatballer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-14, 11:38 AM   #1252
Fat Boy
Wheelsuck
 
Fat Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 6,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It seems terribly risky, but in that risk is a substantial upside. Will it take over all currency? I highly doubt it. It could become a reasonable sized player, though. If a big company like Amazon, Walmart or, hell, even Starbucks started to accept it for payment, it could quite quickly become 'mainstream'. The ability to ship it all over the world without transaction fees could be a real advantage.

It's kind of one of those 'toothpaste out of the tube' type of deals, I think. Even if Bitcoin itself doesn't ultimately succeed, I think some sort of virtual currency may very well be a common part of our future.
Fat Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-14, 12:15 PM   #1253
mattm
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Bikes:
Posts: 13,816
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 154 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flatballer View Post
and assume bitcoin can somehow take over the world
Does anyone really think that's a possibility?
__________________
cat 1.

blog
mattm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-14, 12:25 PM   #1254
ovoleg
Powered by Borscht
 
ovoleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Bikes: Russian Vodka
Posts: 8,344
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattm View Post
Does anyone really think that's a possibility?
world governments will step I'm sure. I think it'll exist in some form or another, just like silkroad and piratebay.
ovoleg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-14, 12:35 PM   #1255
Flatballer
No matches
 
Flatballer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Bikes: two wheeled ones
Posts: 10,680
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise...01/chrisdixon/. Here's one VC guy who thinks it'll be worth $100k. Whether that's just him running a long game pump and dump I dunno.

I don't think anyone thinks people in poor countries will be using bitcoins instead of US Dollars anytime soon, but certainly there are people who think it will be the major form of payment online, which is a good portion of overall money transfer.

I think it's a bubble, but I think as a means of transfer online it has some value, just not $1000+. It won't go to 0, but it won't be worth a ton either.
Flatballer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-14, 12:54 PM   #1256
furiousferret
Senior Member
 
furiousferret's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redlands, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 4,549
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 61 Post(s)
SharePoint 2013 is a pain. That is all.
furiousferret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-14, 01:21 PM   #1257
mattm
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Bikes:
Posts: 13,816
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 154 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by furiousferret View Post
SharePoint 2013 is a pain. That is all.
+1 I hate it!!

Sharepoint is bloated and stupid. The URLs to documents are way too long!! Whatever company that made it needs to redo it..
__________________
cat 1.

blog
mattm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-14, 03:23 PM   #1258
Fat Boy
Wheelsuck
 
Fat Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 6,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flatballer View Post
http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise...01/chrisdixon/. Here's one VC guy who thinks it'll be worth $100k. Whether that's just him running a long game pump and dump I dunno.

I don't think anyone thinks people in poor countries will be using bitcoins instead of US Dollars anytime soon, but certainly there are people who think it will be the major form of payment online, which is a good portion of overall money transfer.

I think it's a bubble, but I think as a means of transfer online it has some value, just not $1000+. It won't go to 0, but it won't be worth a ton either.
I think the developing countries would love something like Bitcoin. When you have governments that are complete clowns with how they deal with their currency the people are constantly looking for other forms of money that are less volatile. Maybe Bitcoin or something similar would be a good option. The problem right now is how to spend them, but if it starts being more readily acceptable, then there are some interesting future scenarios.

Like any currency, people have to have faith in it. That's the biggest hurdle. Who knows if it'll get over that one.
Fat Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-14, 03:26 PM   #1259
Creakyknees
ride lots be safe
 
Creakyknees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Bikes:
Posts: 5,205
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattm View Post
+1 I hate it!!

Sharepoint is bloated and stupid. The URLs to documents are way too long!! Whatever company that made it needs to redo it..

https://www.box.com/

yer welcome
Creakyknees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-14, 11:23 PM   #1260
mattm
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Bikes:
Posts: 13,816
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 154 Post(s)
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/

Quote:
Okay, so you're a CS graduate and you did a hardware/assembly course as part of your degree, but perhaps that was a few years ago now and you haven't really kept up with the details of processor designs since then.In particular, you might not be aware of some key topics that developed rapidly in recent times...
  • pipelining (superscalar, OoO, VLIW, branch prediction, predication)
  • multi-core & simultaneous multithreading (SMT, hyper-threading)
  • SIMD vector instructions (MMX/SSE/AVX, AltiVec)
  • caches and the memory hierarchy
As a software-only guy, this is interesting reading.. granted I won't read the whole damn thing!
__________________
cat 1.

blog
mattm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-14, 07:18 AM   #1261
Flatballer
No matches
 
Flatballer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Bikes: two wheeled ones
Posts: 10,680
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Any car guys, there's a new game I found through Jalopnik (awesome car website if you don't visit it). It's called Automation: The Car Company Tycoon or something like that. It's not complete yet, but they're releasing it in stages. The demo is pretty good and lets you play around a lot, for $25 you can buy the full version and it will get updated as they finish. Should be done late 2014, and they've been pretty good about sticking to their promises and there's lots of buzz and money coming in, so they should be fine.

The basic gist is that you build a car company from the ground up, over the years, as technology progresses you get access to new stuff, you buy different factories to help you, etc.

The difference from most tycoon games is that it's extremely involved. The first thing you do is make an engine. And you don't just pick components and stick them together. You pick the block type (I-4, flatplane V8, crossplane V8, or I6 are the current choices, but they'll be expanded later, I4 is the only one available in the demo), block material (iron, aluminum, AlSi, Magnesium), crank material, connecting rod material, piston material. Every choice has a cost, it affects the economy, rpm limit, weight, build time (man hours), money, etc. It's extremely well modeled, such as pistons made of a different material than the block can lead to a lower MTBF or lower fuel economy (too much blowby). Then you pick the heads, valve configuration, etc. Turbo(s), if you pick one or two, you can choose the compressor ratio and everything. Fueling type (carb or injection, double barrel or four, common injection, direct injection, etc), intake type, etc. Then you dyno the engine and see if it blows up. Then you tweak for hours getting it right. Then you build a car to put it in (similarly involved, but not as finished yet as the engine builder). Eventually there will be a campaign where you try to make the whole company by building your car lineup and stuff and updating it through the years.

There's also challenge things, right now only engine challenges, where it gives you a list of restrictions, and a list of requirements, and a little story to go along with why you're building that engine, and then you try to make an engine that meets the requirements. It's pretty awesome.
Flatballer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-14, 01:07 AM   #1262
Enthalpic
Killing Rabbits
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Played with Scratch again tonight and changed the physics of my little orbit program. Learned about drawing and cloning. It's kind of fun if you get a neat orbit.

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/17567062/
Enthalpic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-14, 09:01 AM   #1263
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
Posts: 26,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flatballer View Post
Any car guys, there's a new game I found through Jalopnik (awesome car website if you don't visit it). It's called Automation: The Car Company Tycoon or something like that. It's not complete yet, but they're releasing it in stages. The demo is pretty good and lets you play around a lot, for $25 you can buy the full version and it will get updated as they finish. Should be done late 2014, and they've been pretty good about sticking to their promises and there's lots of buzz and money coming in, so they should be fine.

The basic gist is that you build a car company from the ground up, over the years, as technology progresses you get access to new stuff, you buy different factories to help you, etc.

The difference from most tycoon games is that it's extremely involved. The first thing you do is make an engine. And you don't just pick components and stick them together. You pick the block type (I-4, flatplane V8, crossplane V8, or I6 are the current choices, but they'll be expanded later, I4 is the only one available in the demo), block material (iron, aluminum, AlSi, Magnesium), crank material, connecting rod material, piston material. Every choice has a cost, it affects the economy, rpm limit, weight, build time (man hours), money, etc. It's extremely well modeled, such as pistons made of a different material than the block can lead to a lower MTBF or lower fuel economy (too much blowby). Then you pick the heads, valve configuration, etc. Turbo(s), if you pick one or two, you can choose the compressor ratio and everything. Fueling type (carb or injection, double barrel or four, common injection, direct injection, etc), intake type, etc. Then you dyno the engine and see if it blows up. Then you tweak for hours getting it right. Then you build a car to put it in (similarly involved, but not as finished yet as the engine builder). Eventually there will be a campaign where you try to make the whole company by building your car lineup and stuff and updating it through the years.

There's also challenge things, right now only engine challenges, where it gives you a list of restrictions, and a list of requirements, and a little story to go along with why you're building that engine, and then you try to make an engine that meets the requirements. It's pretty awesome.
Ack! last thing I need is another addiction cool though

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enthalpic View Post
Played with Scratch again tonight and changed the physics of my little orbit program. Learned about drawing and cloning. It's kind of fun if you get a neat orbit.

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/17567062/
Nice. Seems like most of my clones draw some cool stuff. I didn't know about the SHIFT- advanced mode stuff. Coooool.
waterrockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-14, 01:10 AM   #1264
Enthalpic
Killing Rabbits
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Crap this "game" is too much fun. By "game" I mean figuring out how to make simple games... this one was easy.

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/17671257/

Last edited by Enthalpic; 02-07-14 at 08:06 PM.
Enthalpic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-14, 08:33 AM   #1265
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
Posts: 26,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enthalpic View Post
Crap this "game" is too much fun. By "game" I mean figuring out how to make simple games... this one was easy.


http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/17622493/
All those 80's style games seem to be so easy to make with Scratch. This was actually my first learning project on it (using my daughter's account). 40 minutes to make this -- same game I made in a week in college.
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/15947387/
waterrockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-14, 12:41 PM   #1266
mattm
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Bikes:
Posts: 13,816
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 154 Post(s)
Speaking of 80's games, that "Flappy Bird" iOS game is supposedly pulling in $50k - per day!!

Per day... I mean wow.

Haven't played it, but it looks pretty simple.
__________________
cat 1.

blog
mattm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-14, 01:19 PM   #1267
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
Posts: 26,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Agreed.

It's a bit of a crap shoot for the developers. There are a ton of little games out there that are no lower tech, but they lack the balance and addictive play-ability. Still there are probably 100s of these well-designed games that never catch on either. I guess it's just like every other part of the entertainment industry with respect to tons of productions and relatively few that snag the attention of millions. Certainly the challenge is not a technical one though.

Bad Land is a pretty simple little game that I started playing a couple months ago when I'm waiting in line or whatever. Great feel, and I could probably write about 80% in Scratch w/out too much trouble (scrollers are a bit of a pain in Scratch though).
waterrockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-14, 07:22 PM   #1268
Enthalpic
Killing Rabbits
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattm View Post
Speaking of 80's games, that "Flappy Bird" iOS game is supposedly pulling in $50k - per day!!

Per day... I mean wow.

Haven't played it, but it looks pretty simple.
I tried the android version. I would say it's far from "balanced." It is stupidly hard, I guess people like frustration.

From a programming point of view it is very simplistic.

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/16975457/
Enthalpic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-14, 08:51 PM   #1269
Enthalpic
Killing Rabbits
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Still playing around on Scratch, it's been one month now and I've learned a lot.

Here is my attempt at schooling / flock behaviour. Their behaviour is not predetermined; it's a bunch of randomizations and rules that say they must stay close -but not too close- to each other and that they should try to align their direction.

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/18077844/

From what I've read very similar simple rules control fantastic things like this. I would love to see this in person.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRNqhi2ka9k
Enthalpic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-14, 10:23 PM   #1270
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
Posts: 26,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Very cool stuff. These steering behaviors are a lot of fun to play with, as you can build them from the ground up and get some really natural looking behaviors. If you can start by modeling pretty close to how a fish can move in the water, then have each fish steer through that interface while obeying the school, flock, or swarm behavior, it all comes together really nicely.

Good work.
waterrockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-14, 10:43 PM   #1271
Enthalpic
Killing Rabbits
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
The steering keys still work (arrows, hold r to swim fast), try herding a bunch of clones into a ball then charging and scaring (spacebar). The scatter effect I wanted works OK.
Enthalpic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-14, 07:29 AM   #1272
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
Posts: 26,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Yeah, that is a cool effect. Easy to ball them up in the corners too
waterrockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-14, 11:07 PM   #1273
mattm
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Bikes:
Posts: 13,816
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 154 Post(s)
Write code to generate random numbers in a range.

int myrand(int min, int max);

But, you can't use rand() or any library methods for generating random numbers..

I wrote some basic code to do it but there's gotta be a better way.
__________________
cat 1.

blog
mattm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-14, 07:25 AM   #1274
slynkie
negligent.
 
slynkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: White Plains, NY
Bikes: a few
Posts: 837
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattm View Post
Write code to generate random numbers in a range.

int myrand(int min, int max);

But, you can't use rand() or any library methods for generating random numbers..

I wrote some basic code to do it but there's gotta be a better way.
You need something to seed the generator. I've never written a lib function for this but iirc, some common textbook examples are a) mouse cursor input and b) microphone input. I doubt lower level language lib implementations use these, though..

Off the top of my head - barring access to some input device you could use for seeding, I'd look for a high resolution time function, and use a digit from each time sample for your random #. If your timer isn't high enough resolution to get (different) digits quickly, try some small sleeps.
__________________
SUBADWITY
slynkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-14, 02:31 PM   #1275
mattm
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Bikes:
Posts: 13,816
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 154 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by slynkie View Post
You need something to seed the generator. I've never written a lib function for this but iirc, some common textbook examples are a) mouse cursor input and b) microphone input. I doubt lower level language lib implementations use these, though..

Off the top of my head - barring access to some input device you could use for seeding, I'd look for a high resolution time function, and use a digit from each time sample for your random #. If your timer isn't high enough resolution to get (different) digits quickly, try some small sleeps.
Yeah at first I tried using milliseconds as my seed but it wasn't fast enough; sleeping wouldn't be an option. (this is just for interview practice btw, but they wouldn't like the sleep option)

I also toyed with using uninitialized integers/strings as my seeds, but it's not reliable enough.

Quote:
Originally Posted by waterrockets View Post
Is this where you're trying to derive your own generator for the challenge, or are you actually trying to solve this problem?

http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/...ber-Generation
Yeah something like the "Multiply with Carry" method or the "XORshift" method seems to be the best approach.

Xorshift:

Quote:
uint32_t xor128(void) {
static uint32_t x = 123456789;
static uint32_t y = 362436069;
static uint32_t z = 521288629;
static uint32_t w = 88675123;
uint32_t t;

t = x ^ (x << 11);
x = y; y = z; z = w;
return w = w ^ (w >> 19) ^ (t ^ (t >> 8));
**
That code pretty much blew my mind. I understand the syntax, just not how one would arrive at it!!

I wrote a basic rand method using CPU clock cycles and the Middle-square method, but I doubt it would pass the "Diehard" test.

In one of my recent interviews I was asked to generate GUIDs without using a built-in rand() method, which brought this problem to mind.

If I ever get asked it again I'll have a better answer! (which would not be memorizing one of the fancy methods, but at least being familar with them and simpler options like the Middle-square method)
__________________
cat 1.

blog
mattm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:51 PM.