Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    256
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Which would you do to raise LT the quickest

    If you had the choice between riding 28 hrs in the next week at a moderate pace or riding 15 hours with three of the days having 3x15w lt intervals, what which one would you choose?

  2. #2
    Senior Member johnybutts's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Houston, TX
    My Bikes
    Type of horse.
    Posts
    3,219
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Neither, I'd get sick and have to spend a week off the bike if I did that much.

  3. #3
    i got nothing. Crash716's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Cali Forn NI A (SoCal)
    My Bikes
    13 BH G6 with SRAM Red
    Posts
    5,447
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    both of those would get me sick, so i choose c, continue a long on my not training enough to be a contender in a race and then make excuses like "my wife just had a baby" to my teammates training plan.
    14 days...

  4. #4
    My idea of fun kensuf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    My Bikes
    '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '02 Kona Lavadome, '07 Giant TCR Advanced, '07 Karate Monkey
    Posts
    9,727
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What's your previous training been like? Neither method will really do much for you long term without a good foundation and without being part of a plan.

    If you haven't been doing any structured intensity, and won't be doing any after, 3 LT sessions isn't enough to really raise the roof.

    If you haven't been riding many hours (~>10-15), a 28 hour base week isn't going to do anything except make you hate your bike and leave you tired and open you up to injury / sickness.
    Putting the Duh in Floriduh.

  5. #5
    fuggitivo solitario echappist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    7,651
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    bingo to all three responses.

    OP, this is the main (yet often under-appreciated) benefit of a power meter: the ability to quantify your training load. Each day's workout produces a certain training stress called training stress score (TSS). There's your chronic training load (or CTL, defined to be the moving exponential average of TSS of a long period, usually last 42days) and acute training load (or ATL, the moving exponential average of TSS of short period, usually last 7 days). If you are not mathematically inclined, the CTL basically changes very slowly as the stress of previous training counts more than the stress from your latest, while the opposite is true for ATL. You want to ramp your CTL at a steady, yet not too rapid fashion. Furthermore, there's something called training stress balance, which is CTL-ATL. Once this value gets too negative, people either overreach, overtrain, burn out, or get sick.

    So without knowing how much you were training (which given your access to a PM, should be quantified using the terms above), none of us can help you judge these things. For most of us, 28 hours of base represents such a sudden rise in ATL (remember, CTL ramps slowly) that it would mean the TSB dips way low, causing burnouts, illness, or both. Not to beat a dead horse, but this is why when you mentioned you use a PM, i suggested you get that book. Using info from the book, you soon realize that there's a typical TSS associated with each type of workouts, and there are calculators out there (Wattage Forum) that will allow you to plan your weekly training load and see how your CTL and TSB change, thus allowing you to structure your training to you can put in the most amount of work possible without burning out.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •