Spinner to a fault
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Anselmo, CA
Posts: 193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Spinner to a fault
It seems like the majority of competitive cyclists have the opposite problem as I do, spinning so much that power/strength is lacking. I can out-spin just about anyone I encounter on the road or in a race. And I often get comments from people about my high RPM. This has it's benefits on all but the longest climbs and for accelerations, especially in crits. I can avoid the dreaded lactic build-up longer at a high cadence.
But the limitations are obvious in the flat out hammering department, when higher RPMs can't beat higher FTP. I'm assuming here that a lower cadence with a higher power output will cause less fatigue than a higher cadence with a lower power output.
Any specific advice on how to not rely on high cadence so much and how to build more power, especially now that I'm midway into the racing season? Or is it acceptable to just play to my strengths?
But the limitations are obvious in the flat out hammering department, when higher RPMs can't beat higher FTP. I'm assuming here that a lower cadence with a higher power output will cause less fatigue than a higher cadence with a lower power output.
Any specific advice on how to not rely on high cadence so much and how to build more power, especially now that I'm midway into the racing season? Or is it acceptable to just play to my strengths?
#2
Batüwü Creakcreak
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The illadelph
Posts: 20,791
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
160 Posts
You can generate the same power by either spinning more or applying more force.
You build more power by training FTP not by deciding to switch to low cadence.
You build more power by training FTP not by deciding to switch to low cadence.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Anselmo, CA
Posts: 193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Are you saying that if, as an example, I train more in Zone 4 to train FTP, my overall speed and race endurance will increase regardless of whether I spin or mash?
#7
Senior Member
Spinning and power are not mutually exclusive, if anything, they go together. Track sprinters have a very high cadence and are extremely poerful. Sounds like you need to work on powwer, but don't try to get more power by altering your cadence. It sounds like you have a good spin.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 95
Bikes: Giant TCR
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I used to actively try to keep my rpm at 95+ and never really noticed it hurting me in hard group rides or races. I've since gone completely without a computer and don't pay any attention to my cadence beyond doing what feels good. I think I may have dropped a good 10 rpm in the process. Bottom line (for me at least) is don't overthink it
-sean
-sean
#9
Batüwü Creakcreak
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The illadelph
Posts: 20,791
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
160 Posts
Yes. I also think you should pick up a book about training so you can figure some of this stuff out. It seems like you know very little about the topic and it would really help you out as you start training for next season!
#10
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
6 Posts
If it wasn't acceptable, I'd never win a thing.
#11
You blink and it's gone.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundas, Ontario
Posts: 4,436
Bikes: Race bike, training bike, go fast bike and a trainer slave.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Keep spinning....The goal is to push the next gear at the same cadence...you go faster
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 274
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I think you may be confusing the term "power" with the term "torque". Like someone already said above, a Watt (measure of power) is a Watt. So, if you are generating less power, regardless of cadence, you'll likely experience less fatigue than if you were generating higher power. However, to generate the same power at lower cadence requires more torque (force applied to pedal). Because of the higher torque, many people's legs tend to fatigue sooner at lower cadence than at higher cadence. However, to spin at a high cadence requires cadiovascular fitness and neuromuscular adaptations, both of which are trainable. . . in the end, every rider is unique in all these areas, so "optimal cadence" is very personal.
#13
Killing Rabbits
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,697
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 217 Times
in
102 Posts
Yep, your self selected cadence for a given power output is best; forcing people to pedal faster or slower often results in a decrease in performance. The human body is inherently lazy; you apply a given workload and it will find the easiest way to do it with what it's given.
That said you can “spin to a fault.” Leg flapping takes energy, and at some point it’s just a waste. Imagine riding a bike with no chain on a trainer at 120rpm...
Furthermore, much of racing is dependent on maximal fiber activation, so super spiny guy may get dropped even though his legs are freshest because he can’t produce sufficient force.
#14
Senior Member
play to your strengths but train your weaknesses. The only way to get the torque you lacking is to ride in the bigger gears. you get stronger by lifting heavier weights periodically, not by lifting light weights a million times.
Obviously this is where you have to be careful to do the right amount because you will be overloading your legs. spinning is more playing it safe.
Obviously this is where you have to be careful to do the right amount because you will be overloading your legs. spinning is more playing it safe.
Last edited by Nick Bain; 04-28-11 at 09:53 PM.
#15
Wheelsuck
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Keep a your high cadence, but shift 3 gears up.
--------------------------------------------------------
Incidentally, if you can maintain a high cadence without losing biomechanical efficiency (i.e. no 'leg flapping'), there are mechanical advantages. For a given speed, you'll be in a bigger rear cog, and the bigger the rear cog you're in, the more efficient a chain drive system is. It might only be 1/2% gain or less, but it's something.
--------------------------------------------------------
Incidentally, if you can maintain a high cadence without losing biomechanical efficiency (i.e. no 'leg flapping'), there are mechanical advantages. For a given speed, you'll be in a bigger rear cog, and the bigger the rear cog you're in, the more efficient a chain drive system is. It might only be 1/2% gain or less, but it's something.
#16
Senior Member
you can be efficient as hell but efficiency has nothing to do with torque. example: honda engine. If you shift up 3 gears, you will have to lower your cadence to match the output of high cadence riding style. the first couple times you do it, you will probably be going slower and feel less efficient. It will pay off. Hill climbs are when most people get dropped. Lance beat everyone on a hill because he could turn the biggest gear at 80 rpm.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Murrieta, CA
Posts: 1,035
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
While out doing intervals on a flat course I always come to the point where I need to spin faster or shift and grind a bigger gear to get into the zone I want. Lately I've been grinding a bigger gear because it seems like there is more growth potential for me there. My strength has been improving and I've slowly been able to spin that bigger gear at higher cadence.
#18
Wheelsuck
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#19
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
6 Posts
At low to moderate workloads that makes total sense; more repetitions with lower force puts more of the total work on the fatigue resistant slow twitch fibers.
Yep, your self selected cadence for a given power output is best; forcing people to pedal faster or slower often results in a decrease in performance. The human body is inherently lazy; you apply a given workload and it will find the easiest way to do it with what it's given.
That said you can “spin to a fault.” Leg flapping takes energy, and at some point it’s just a waste. Imagine riding a bike with no chain on a trainer at 120rpm.
Furthermore, much of racing is dependent on maximal fiber activation, so super spiny guy may get dropped even though his legs are freshest because he can’t produce sufficient force.
Yep, your self selected cadence for a given power output is best; forcing people to pedal faster or slower often results in a decrease in performance. The human body is inherently lazy; you apply a given workload and it will find the easiest way to do it with what it's given.
That said you can “spin to a fault.” Leg flapping takes energy, and at some point it’s just a waste. Imagine riding a bike with no chain on a trainer at 120rpm.
Furthermore, much of racing is dependent on maximal fiber activation, so super spiny guy may get dropped even though his legs are freshest because he can’t produce sufficient force.
I think you may be confusing the term "power" with the term "torque". Like someone already said above, a Watt (measure of power) is a Watt. So, if you are generating less power, regardless of cadence, you'll likely experience less fatigue than if you were generating higher power. However, to generate the same power at lower cadence requires more torque (force applied to pedal). Because of the higher torque, many people's legs tend to fatigue sooner at lower cadence than at higher cadence. However, to spin at a high cadence requires cadiovascular fitness and neuromuscular adaptations, both of which are trainable. . . in the end, every rider is unique in all these areas, so "optimal cadence" is very personal.
#20
Senior Member
If you have more force you can spin the bigger gear but before that you have to turn the bigger gear slower. That is my opinion if that makes any sense. lol. I don't want to get into a pissing match. lol.
Last edited by Nick Bain; 04-29-11 at 12:01 AM.
#21
Making a kilometer blurry
I respectfully disagree with your point because I think your output would increase or become unsustainable to the training zone.
If you have more force you can spin the bigger gear but before that you have to turn the bigger gear slower. That is my opinion if that makes any sense. lol. I don't want to get into a pissing match. lol.
If you have more force you can spin the bigger gear but before that you have to turn the bigger gear slower. That is my opinion if that makes any sense. lol. I don't want to get into a pissing match. lol.
Yeah, it's pretty simple. For a given power output, there are infinite combinations of torque and angular velocity to reach it:
where P is power, τ is torque, ω is the angular velocity, and · represents the scalar product. (from Wikipedia, of course)
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Look, I'm not going to try and do the math, although it's interesting. There are plenty of coaching and training strategies for both mashers and spinners. Each of us is different and there are probably optimums for both, as there have been throughout all of bicycle racing history. The bottom line for ME is to do what is most comfortable given distance, speed, time and goals, and work toward building the potency of the other. If you're a spinner, spin like hell and work on building power during training to increase your strength so you can gradually turn a bigger gear for a longer period while still spinning and feeling good. I would think the opposite would be true, too.
Anecdotally, I'm a spinner and find my optimum cadence to be 105 rpm and when I started training, I began on my 39 tooth ring because I couldn't physically spin the 52. As I trained over the year, I worked on building power and speed and sustainability and finally was able to spin the 52 tooth ring. Now, I'm on the 52 ring exclusively so my strength increased over time. I still have the same 105 rpm cadence that "feels" good and I'm faster for longer periods of time.
By the way, spinning is something that you'll eventually lose (generally) as the fast twitch muscles that produce that effect degenerate over time with age. MY coach tells me to continue using the highest cadence you can for as long as you can because cardio-vascularly, it's more efficient FOR MY BODY. So, if you don't want to be a spinner, just wait a while. It'll go away and you'll be left a masher.
Anecdotally, I'm a spinner and find my optimum cadence to be 105 rpm and when I started training, I began on my 39 tooth ring because I couldn't physically spin the 52. As I trained over the year, I worked on building power and speed and sustainability and finally was able to spin the 52 tooth ring. Now, I'm on the 52 ring exclusively so my strength increased over time. I still have the same 105 rpm cadence that "feels" good and I'm faster for longer periods of time.
By the way, spinning is something that you'll eventually lose (generally) as the fast twitch muscles that produce that effect degenerate over time with age. MY coach tells me to continue using the highest cadence you can for as long as you can because cardio-vascularly, it's more efficient FOR MY BODY. So, if you don't want to be a spinner, just wait a while. It'll go away and you'll be left a masher.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Anselmo, CA
Posts: 193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
While out doing intervals on a flat course I always come to the point where I need to spin faster or shift and grind a bigger gear to get into the zone I want. Lately I've been grinding a bigger gear because it seems like there is more growth potential for me there. My strength has been improving and I've slowly been able to spin that bigger gear at higher cadence.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Murrieta, CA
Posts: 1,035
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Assuming the grinding you refer to is just one gear higher than normal, this seems like practical advice. Does this apply for only higher intensity training, or should it be applied to zone 2 rides as well? Friel always seems to emphasize spinning at lower intensities (which helps explain how I developed my spin during three months of base building).
That being said this year was the first year I did a real "base" period. For those rides I tended to be slightly below average cadence. Right now for my longer interval workouts (5,10,20min) I'm pushing a bigger gear and lower cadence (low 80s for now). For the short intervals (1,2min) I'll spin higher (95+). I also do seated short hill repeats in an extremely big gear at about 60rpm for strength.
I switched to these types of workouts this year after realizing that my legs were never very sore after a hard ride. I had overall fatigue but not the muscle soreness I've heard other riders complain about. I'm also 40 and have asthma so I didn't think my cardiovascular system had much more room for growth.