Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > "The 33"-Road Bike Racing
Reload this Page >

Random Thought Thread, aka The RTT (**possible spoilers**)

Search
Notices
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

Random Thought Thread, aka The RTT (**possible spoilers**)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-13, 08:08 PM
  #9626  
Senior Member
 
rankin116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: ChapelBorro NC
Posts: 4,126
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
Jump away, I've got hours of testing in tunnels, HDC and the field. At zero yaw rider's impact on frame differentiation is pretty minimal. All the big surface areas of the bike see clean air. Given a 35-40 MPH sprint down a barricaded area would produce something near to zero yaw (certainly it appeared that crosswinds weren't an issue that day) I'd be comfortable in standing by my statement that Foil>Evo.

As you push more yaw your point is more viable.

At zero more differentiation could come from cable routing, handlebar width and shape, lever placement, Etc. But that's noise in the frame question.

I'd throw a pretty big load of cash betting Gerrans has a lower CdA just based on his size and a smaller bike, which in the frame vs. frame question is also noise, but in the Sagan vs. Gerrans question sure wasn't.
Nah, I really don't have a dog in this fight. I was commenting more on my feeling that there are sooo many variables at play on the road that I find it hard to buy into 'this frame is faster no matter what' thing. As a scientist I question any sort of blanket statements like that, but I fully admit that I have not sought out the data. I think what gets to me the most is that almost all of the data comes from people selling something. I know there really isn't a way around that either, not like the government is going to start funding bicycle aerodynamics research so we can have peer-reviewed publications.
rankin116 is offline  
Old 07-02-13, 08:17 PM
  #9627  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
...
It took me less than 90 seconds to come up with that.
...
And in 90 seconds, you've just eliminated field sprints and pack riding as we know it. Anyone for bumping shoulders with the dude in the Obree position (either one)? In his original position, he couldn't even stay on the track by himself without putting his chest on his bars. Roadies like to complain about triathletes riding in unstable postures...

So, how do you fix this? You either be content with wild evolutions of racing style as it follows technology trends or you make another rule.

The above process is exactly what the UCI did, and those 90 seconds of rulemaking just described the, say, 1930's rulebook. You are defining a bicycle based on what you don't want it to look like (not a recumbent, HPV, or "lay down" bike). Then the guy comes along with the sketchy frame that is drilled full of holes and you create a rule for that. Then the guy who rests his chest on his bars comes along and you design a rule for that. Etc. And then you get a huge picture made of negative space defining what a bike is not. And what inevitably drives it? It's not about how the bikes look, it's about how the game is played. NASCAR and Formula racing styles are totally different not because the drivers prefer different styles of racing but because the technology makes the race play out differently. You plop a couple Formula cars in a NASCAR race and it instantly becomes a Formula race with a bunch of yahoos in NASCAR cars bringing up the rear. If you want to preserve the NASCAR style, you start defining what a NASCAR car is and we are right back where we are with the UCI.

It's no secret that there are wildly faster bikes than roadbikes out there. I just looked back at an old local TT result: there was a recumbent category - the top recumbent beat DrWJODonnell (of the "Before you start another TT thread" fame) by over two minutes on a 14 mile course.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 07-02-13, 08:50 PM
  #9628  
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Posts: 9,788
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Regarding tech, I think I'm mostly with RX: imagine if we had thrown the doors open to innovation in the 90's instead of the UCI stifling it. What would we be racing on now?

The problem goes beyond merely limiting what's available for racing (I know RX pointed this out already, but stay with me). Because of the marketing effect of racing success and trickle down of technology, what's available to recreational riders is limited, yes, but so is even our imagination of what and how good a bicycle can be! Just look at the ridiculous Internet debates over putting hydraulic disc brakes on road racing bikes, a pretty low bar for innovation - but it's too easy to convince oneself that the bikes we have are "good enough." Imagine someone arguing that about cars! I know, people do, stick-in-the-mudism can never be done away with, but even in relatively mainstream circles, the idea that modern cars are "good enough," that they aren't ripe for improvement, is preposterous.

Professional racing could certainly improve the breed, but with the UCI rules as they stand, we're improving it in very limited and arbitrary ways. And it's only going to get worse, word on the street is that the UCI is planning to ban wheels deeper than 60mm or so in mass-start races. Why? Where does it stop?

It makes me wonder about chilling effects, too. As technology has advanced, the trade-offs in weight or aerodynamics or power loss become more favorable to bicycle improvements that weren't practical before. I'd love to see a return to efforts to build suspended race bikes - I'm sure that there's some speed to be found there, especially in cyclocross. But do you put millions of dollars into developing something radically new when the UCI might up and ban it on a whim? I'd be pretty nervous about giving the OK on a project like that if I ran a big bike company. A world where disc brakes are considered a scary, radical change is pretty sad, if you ask me, but that's the world we're in - one where only a relatively small improvement like that is considered safe to really make a push for in the industry.
grolby is offline  
Old 07-02-13, 09:00 PM
  #9629  
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Posts: 9,788
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
And in 90 seconds, you've just eliminated field sprints and pack riding as we know it. Anyone for bumping shoulders with the dude in the Obree position (either one)? In his original position, he couldn't even stay on the track by himself without putting his chest on his bars. Roadies like to complain about triathletes riding in unstable postures...
I think your example is punching holes in your own declaration. Eliminates field sprints and pack riding? Really? Drafting in close quarters is still going to be critical in a mass-start bicycle race; successful designs are going to have to take that into account. I do agree with what you're saying about not wanting it to be the Wild West as far as safety is concerned, but otherwise you're making some awfully strong assumptions about effects on racing that I don't really think are warranted. Just look at your auto-racing examples: F1 and NASCAR racers aren't in the same environment. You don't see so much drafting in F1, as I understand it, because it interferes with the aerodynamics of the following vehicle and eliminates a lot of the downforce; but then, drafting is probably less of an issue to begin with when you have smaller grids and different kinds of courses. Obviously the rules have a huge role in dictating the kinds of vehicles that are raced in both sports, but the environmental differences would dictate different cars even if the equipment rules were the same.
grolby is offline  
Old 07-02-13, 09:01 PM
  #9630  
Senior Member
 
shovelhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jandro
I pressed the buttons a few times on a Ui2 setup when it first came out. It was... neat, I guess.
Riding it is one thing. Racing it is another. If you haven't raced it, you don't understand the advantages.
shovelhd is offline  
Old 07-02-13, 09:06 PM
  #9631  
shaken, not stirred.
 
gnome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Shaky Isles.
Posts: 5,250

Bikes: I've lost count.

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1412 Post(s)
Liked 971 Times in 390 Posts
Originally Posted by shovelhd
25 years ago today I married my best friend. Best decision I ever made. She is my rock.
__________________
Get a bicycle. You will not regret it if you live. ~Mark Twain, "Taming the Bicycle"
vBulletin: snafu
gnome is offline  
Old 07-02-13, 09:57 PM
  #9632  
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Flatballer
I don't even have a TT bike yet. Or race wheels. I have one track bike with crappy wheels, and one road bike with open pros and a PT. The road bike is a Ridley Noah, but the rest of my stuff is cheap. I have a long, long way to go on the engine before I can even try to convince my wife that we need more bike stuff.
Pretty much similar equipment on my part, but I'm not waiting for the engine to improve before buying the gear... I'm just not buying the gear. Results in this sport haven't been important enough for me to continue adding budget line items for the benefits. I am a believer in the technological innovations and their effects on performance, I'm just not interested in participating at that level.

Lame, I guess. At any rate, I'm at the point of diminishing returns on enjoyment of bike races. It would take a lot more time and money to get significantly more enjoyment out of it, and I have RC gliders to build, boy scout camps to go to, little athletes to coach, and a marriage to enjoy.

Last edited by waterrockets; 07-02-13 at 10:00 PM.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 07-02-13, 10:01 PM
  #9633  
fuggitivo solitario
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 9,107
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
not lame, just un-a-Merikun
echappist is offline  
Old 07-02-13, 10:07 PM
  #9634  
Resident Alien
 
Racer Ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
And in 90 seconds, you've just eliminated field sprints and pack riding as we know it. Anyone for bumping shoulders with the dude in the Obree position (either one)?
Yeah, no one ever crashes in our current position bumping another rider.

You must have been reading the UCI's version of the Obree position. Quick Q n A...how many times did Obree crash?

You ever ride a team pursuit or team time trial? Nah. To dangerous. Much safer sprinting.

Jesus H. are you serious? I go downhill at 55-60 MPH with my chest on the bars. I've banged elbows dozens of time in the aerobars.

Last edited by Racer Ex; 07-02-13 at 11:13 PM.
Racer Ex is offline  
Old 07-02-13, 10:41 PM
  #9635  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
I would quarrel with this continual zero sum game that people like to play about equipment vs. training and what you should focus on. Hey, how about both? Because that sure has seemed to work for me and it's hard to argue that in this sport wins or losses don't often come in a split second. Quick, you think Sagan would have liked an extra 3w the other day?
+1!

Originally Posted by Racer Ex
I've got it on everything. It's the shiznit. Try it on a TT bike and you'll never go back.
+3 for every bike i have with di2. it's incredible.
tetonrider is offline  
Old 07-02-13, 11:07 PM
  #9636  
Senior Member
 
Jandro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,059
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by shovelhd
Riding it is one thing. Racing it is another. If you haven't raced it, you don't understand the advantages.
I don't doubt it. I'll check it out when I start losing races because of equipment and not because I'm slow So far, only the latter is the case.
__________________
Attack in the feeling because it says I'll win absolutely.
Jandro is offline  
Old 07-02-13, 11:13 PM
  #9637  
Resident Alien
 
Racer Ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by rankin116
Nah, I really don't have a dog in this fight. I was commenting more on my feeling that there are sooo many variables at play on the road that I find it hard to buy into 'this frame is faster no matter what' thing. As a scientist I question any sort of blanket statements like that, but I fully admit that I have not sought out the data. I think what gets to me the most is that almost all of the data comes from people selling something. I know there really isn't a way around that either, not like the government is going to start funding bicycle aerodynamics research so we can have peer-reviewed publications.
Well, the data I base my comments on isn't manufacturer generated, and I throw a lot of questions at neutral data as well. FWIW the more I do the more I know and the less I can predict, if that makes any sense.

Some stuff is a slam dunk. Other stuff leaves you trying to wrap your head around why.
Racer Ex is offline  
Old 07-02-13, 11:16 PM
  #9638  
Resident Alien
 
Racer Ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by waterrockets
I have RC gliders to build, boy scout camps to go to, little athletes to coach, and a marriage to enjoy.
You'll never make it to Europe with those messed up priorities.
Racer Ex is offline  
Old 07-03-13, 04:53 AM
  #9639  
Super Moderator
 
Homebrew01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times in 612 Posts
Originally Posted by waterrockets
Pretty much similar equipment on my part, but I'm not waiting for the engine to improve before buying the gear... I'm just not buying the gear. Results in this sport haven't been important enough for me to continue adding budget line items for the benefits. I am a believer in the technological innovations and their effects on performance, I'm just not interested in participating at that level.

Lame, I guess. At any rate, I'm at the point of diminishing returns on enjoyment of bike races. It would take a lot more time and money to get significantly more enjoyment out of it, and I have RC gliders to build, boy scout camps to go to, little athletes to coach, and a marriage to enjoy.
Same here.
It's pretty obvious that equipent matters .... but it's the cost benefit analysis that is up for discussion many times. Big teams and affluent amateurs can buy the best for every advantage, but others have to pick and choose. So, yes, $1500 wheels will make a difference, but is that the best use of $1500 ? Depends.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html

Last edited by Homebrew01; 07-03-13 at 06:18 AM.
Homebrew01 is offline  
Old 07-03-13, 05:10 AM
  #9640  
Senior Member
 
mike868y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 9,284
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 248 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Flatballer
I don't even have a TT bike yet. Or race wheels. I have one track bike with crappy wheels, and one road bike with open pros and a PT. The road bike is a Ridley Noah, but the rest of my stuff is cheap. I have a long, long way to go on the engine before I can even try to convince my wife that we need more bike stuff.
i'm kind of the same way. i've got one road bike (and a fixed gear but that's just a grocery getting, bar bike, etc.). it's a tarmac expert so a pretty nice frame but nothing special. my wheel set (my only wheel set) is a hodgepodge mavic ksyrium elite/fulcrum setup that is basically all I have left on functioning wheels. it has an ultegra group and stock seatpost/handlebars. i changed the stem because the stock one broke. i would love some carbon wheels for racing, but I have a hard time convincing myself it's "worth it."

cutting beer out of my diet would probably do far more for my performance.
mike868y is offline  
Old 07-03-13, 05:22 AM
  #9641  
Senior Member
 
shovelhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mike868y
i'm kind of the same way. i've got one road bike (and a fixed gear but that's just a grocery getting, bar bike, etc.). it's a tarmac expert so a pretty nice frame but nothing special. my wheel set (my only wheel set) is a hodgepodge mavic ksyrium elite/fulcrum setup that is basically all I have left on functioning wheels. it has an ultegra group and stock seatpost/handlebars. i changed the stem because the stock one broke. i would love some carbon wheels for racing, but I have a hard time convincing myself it's "worth it."
You get a pass because you're a starving college student.

I could not afford $2500 for a new Dura-Ace Di2 group. I bought the gearset used. A friend gave me the sprint shifters. The climbing and TT buttons were $7.99/set on closeout at Performance. The seatpost battery cost $15, and another $10 for connectors.

Same deal for my wheels. $500 for the used set of 404's, and about the same for the used set of psimet clinchers.
shovelhd is offline  
Old 07-03-13, 05:56 AM
  #9642  
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
Yeah, no one ever crashes in our current position bumping another rider.

You must have been reading the UCI's version of the Obree position. Quick Q n A...how many times did Obree crash?

You ever ride a team pursuit or team time trial? Nah. To dangerous. Much safer sprinting.

Jesus H. are you serious? I go downhill at 55-60 MPH with my chest on the bars. I've banged elbows dozens of time in the aerobars.
Not elbows but it is a TTT...

waterrockets is offline  
Old 07-03-13, 06:20 AM
  #9643  
Senior Member
 
shovelhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The guy on the front looks familiar. I think he's the jerk that took my Strava KOM away.
shovelhd is offline  
Old 07-03-13, 06:41 AM
  #9644  
out walking the earth
Thread Starter
 
gsteinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lake Placid, NY
Posts: 21,441
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 912 Post(s)
Liked 752 Times in 342 Posts
looks like he went bowling
gsteinb is offline  
Old 07-03-13, 07:20 AM
  #9645  
fuggitivo solitario
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 9,107
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by shovelhd
The guy on the front looks familiar. I think he's the jerk that took my Strava KOM away.
doesn't he, now?

i hear he disrespects the race officials and sprints when he's at the registration table
echappist is offline  
Old 07-03-13, 07:30 AM
  #9646  
My idea of fun
 
kensuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 9,920

Bikes: '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '02 Kona Lavadome, '07 Giant TCR Advanced, '07 Karate Monkey

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by shovelhd
25 years ago today I married my best friend. Best decision I ever made. She is my rock.



We're doing 20 years this August.
kensuf is offline  
Old 07-03-13, 07:57 AM
  #9647  
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Note that the guy hitting the deck does not have aero bars
waterrockets is offline  
Old 07-03-13, 08:03 AM
  #9648  
Senior Member
 
johnybutts's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,317

Bikes: Type of horse.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by waterrockets
Note that the guy hitting the deck does not have aero bars
So what exactly happened?
johnybutts is offline  
Old 07-03-13, 08:34 AM
  #9649  
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Crashy's team was in front, about to get passed by RX's team as they approached a right-hand corner. He missed the corner while RX's team was passing on the left. When they missed the corner, RX's team maintained their line going straight, planning a turnaround to get back on course. When Crashy realized he missed the turn and had caused another team to go straight, he inexplicably freaked out and swerved left, sweeping his own front on RX's wheel.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 07-03-13, 09:14 AM
  #9650  
Senior Member
 
island rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: FFLD CTY, CT
Posts: 1,971
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Homebrew01
So, yes, $1500 wheels will make a difference, but is that the best use of $1500 ? Depends.
Don't do this to me.... I have HED set #1 in my possession, #2 is coming today, and #3 on Friday. I took the 7 and 9 out of the box. Strangely, they didn't seem any different than any other wheel (except tubular, wider and deeper than I currently have). I thought they would be dripping fast and try to roll away out of the box.
island rider is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.