Training Status??? (III)
Senior Member
I get smoked on the climbs. I could be 40 pounds lighter and I'd probably still get smoked on the climbs. I got smoked on the climbs when I was 60 lbs lighter. Took me about 10 years (of non-powermeter era) to accept that I won't ever be a good climber.
Granted, I think I'd be healthier if I was 15% body fat, and realistically I'd be a better rider. However I'm not fooling myself in thinking that I'd somehow manage to get into some good w/kg world.
Granted, I think I'd be healthier if I was 15% body fat, and realistically I'd be a better rider. However I'm not fooling myself in thinking that I'd somehow manage to get into some good w/kg world.
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 789
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am n=1 that anybody can do it. I am not a natural endurance athlete, but with a lot of expertly guided hard work over several years, and simultaneously learning how to eat better, I now have a w/kg that was unimaginable a short while ago (to me; I'm sure not to many of you).
I am confident that most could, for instance, become competitive in a cat 3 RR over rolling hills, if the time and effort are put in. (I note that I likely couldn't do it without being coached; learning how to train has been part of my learning curve.)
As an aside, it seems to me that at any given level, there are those in BF land that work very hard to be there, and there are those that maybe don't work quite as hard, but apparently have a bit more natural talent.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
these are from three races, road, crit and circuit. won the field behind the break, was 4th, 5th.
seems like you did well, now you just have to get more comfortable up there and pick off a few more riders and you can settle into a life of satisfying 4th and 5th place finishes. Or figure out a way to win, in which case please let me know.
Nonsense
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,918
Bikes: Affirmative
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 880 Post(s)
Liked 541 Times
in
237 Posts
Affirmative, I do believe you have helped me find my niche.
Version 7.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 13,127
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 297 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1340 Post(s)
Liked 2,482 Times
in
1,457 Posts
Here you go for six pack abs the easy way. UCI legal.
**** that
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 15,402
Mentioned: 151 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1099 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
30 Posts
Rode around for an hour or so, did some opener/sprint thingies.
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 4,850
Bikes: Yeti ASRc, Focus Raven 29er, Flyxii FR316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Might be worthy of its own thread, but thought I'd ask here before posting.
Spending the summer at ~6,000ft. Previous FTP 325w (at 2000ft), maybe slightly higher. At altitude, and only going up from here, it's ~300w. Various studies and online calculators agree with this, namely: Cycling Power Lab
If I adjust my training zones based off of my new FTP at this altitude, am I actually going to get...weaker? I mean, I'll have the same TSS, in theory, for any given workout (if FTP is adjusted properly), but I won't be doing the same amount of work.
Can anyone lend any insight? Is this where that ol' "Sleep high, train low" thing comes from?
Spending the summer at ~6,000ft. Previous FTP 325w (at 2000ft), maybe slightly higher. At altitude, and only going up from here, it's ~300w. Various studies and online calculators agree with this, namely: Cycling Power Lab
If I adjust my training zones based off of my new FTP at this altitude, am I actually going to get...weaker? I mean, I'll have the same TSS, in theory, for any given workout (if FTP is adjusted properly), but I won't be doing the same amount of work.
Can anyone lend any insight? Is this where that ol' "Sleep high, train low" thing comes from?
**** that
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 15,402
Mentioned: 151 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1099 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
30 Posts
Speaking of elevation, I don't know the answer - but I am racing at 5k feet of elevation tomorrow! Plan is to get there day-of and hope I don't feel too s****y.
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 789
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Might be worthy of its own thread, but thought I'd ask here before posting.
Spending the summer at ~6,000ft. Previous FTP 325w (at 2000ft), maybe slightly higher. At altitude, and only going up from here, it's ~300w. Various studies and online calculators agree with this, namely: Cycling Power Lab
If I adjust my training zones based off of my new FTP at this altitude, am I actually going to get...weaker? I mean, I'll have the same TSS, in theory, for any given workout (if FTP is adjusted properly), but I won't be doing the same amount of work.
Can anyone lend any insight? Is this where that ol' "Sleep high, train low" thing comes from?
Spending the summer at ~6,000ft. Previous FTP 325w (at 2000ft), maybe slightly higher. At altitude, and only going up from here, it's ~300w. Various studies and online calculators agree with this, namely: Cycling Power Lab
If I adjust my training zones based off of my new FTP at this altitude, am I actually going to get...weaker? I mean, I'll have the same TSS, in theory, for any given workout (if FTP is adjusted properly), but I won't be doing the same amount of work.
Can anyone lend any insight? Is this where that ol' "Sleep high, train low" thing comes from?
Altitude changes the blood, so it can carry more oxygen when you go back to sea level...but at altitude you are, in fact, capable of less work because you can get less oxygen into your blood stream, so yes, you can't train as hard. That's exactly the explanation for "sleep high, train low".
Here in Boulder a good setup is to live in Nederland at 7500' but come down to Boulder at 5,000' to train - it's only a 25 minute drive.
Also, you don't train in an oxygen tent...but you do sleep in one.
And, as a rough guess, at 6,000' your ewang will be ~10% lower. Loosely, figure 2-3% per 1,000' of altitude at altitudes around 5,000'...the percentage is less when nearer sea level.
The fun comes when you go back to sea level...
PS - I admittedly don't have deep understanding of this, I'm just relaying the common wisdom around Boulder.
PPS - reticulyte life span is ~30 days, so that's how long it takes your blood to completely adapt to a new altitude.
Senior Member
Did the Stahl Ride Saturday edition today (usually a Wednesday, but work gets in the way). 65 miles, 5000 feet. Mostly easy, first climb Tempo. Last climb I hit the lower steep portion (before the regroup) hard and crushed my PR. Old time 16:52, new time 16:00. Pretty happy with that. Crit in the morning.
commu*ist spy
maybe you can simulate the michael phelps sleeping apparatus by sticking a continuous stream of an inert gas, like say.. argon, nitrogen, carbon monoxide into your room to displace some of the oxygen. I would hazard a guess that 15% would simulate the alps, and 7% would simulate mount everest
commu*ist spy
Killing Rabbits
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,697
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 217 Times
in
102 Posts
maybe you can simulate the michael phelps sleeping apparatus by sticking a continuous stream of an inert gas, like say.. argon, nitrogen, carbon monoxide into your room to displace some of the oxygen. I would hazard a guess that 15% would simulate the alps, and 7% would simulate mount everest
Just FYI carbon monoxide is poisonous and breathing argon is prohibited by WADA.
commu*ist spy
It's a joke
Wait for real they banned argon? I guess I'll have to use helium from now on
Wait for real they banned argon? I guess I'll have to use helium from now on
Last edited by spectastic; 06-28-15 at 12:25 AM.
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,690
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Liked 417 Times
in
249 Posts
Think today will be a rest day.
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
OMC
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 6,960
Bikes: Specialized Allez Sprint, Look 585, Specialized Allez Comp Race
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 461 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
49 Posts
Ouch!
__________________
Regards,
Chuck
Demain, on roule!
Regards,
Chuck
Demain, on roule!
Ninny
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Gunks
Posts: 5,295
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Might be worthy of its own thread, but thought I'd ask here before posting.
Spending the summer at ~6,000ft. Previous FTP 325w (at 2000ft), maybe slightly higher. At altitude, and only going up from here, it's ~300w. Various studies and online calculators agree with this, namely: Cycling Power Lab
If I adjust my training zones based off of my new FTP at this altitude, am I actually going to get...weaker? I mean, I'll have the same TSS, in theory, for any given workout (if FTP is adjusted properly), but I won't be doing the same amount of work.
Can anyone lend any insight? Is this where that ol' "Sleep high, train low" thing comes from?
Spending the summer at ~6,000ft. Previous FTP 325w (at 2000ft), maybe slightly higher. At altitude, and only going up from here, it's ~300w. Various studies and online calculators agree with this, namely: Cycling Power Lab
If I adjust my training zones based off of my new FTP at this altitude, am I actually going to get...weaker? I mean, I'll have the same TSS, in theory, for any given workout (if FTP is adjusted properly), but I won't be doing the same amount of work.
Can anyone lend any insight? Is this where that ol' "Sleep high, train low" thing comes from?
No, you won't get weaker. You need to adjust your training zones, because you won't be able to hit your low-altitude numbers. You'll be creating the same amount of physiological stress and adaptation using the lower numbers.
If by the end of the summer you get your high-altitude FTP up to 325w, then you'll be jamming along at 350w when you get back down to low altitude.
Nonsense
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,918
Bikes: Affirmative
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 880 Post(s)
Liked 541 Times
in
237 Posts
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,690
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Liked 417 Times
in
249 Posts
Oh well, feeling a little better. May ride a few miles just to be sure everything works. Next race not til Aug 1, so there's time to take it easy.
BB
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Version 7.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 13,127
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 297 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1340 Post(s)
Liked 2,482 Times
in
1,457 Posts
The best approach is to show up the day of the race which you are doing. Each hour at elevation gets worse for 3 days and then slow acclimation begins. However, even at 5000 feet you may not have the capability to hit and recover. Once anaerobic at altitude, the recovery is slower. This will be the same for everyone coming from sea level. The guys who are acclimated for altitude will do better. And the response to altitude, like endurance sports, is genetically driven. You may not feel much impact to it sucks. Good luck
Version 7.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 13,127
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 297 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1340 Post(s)
Liked 2,482 Times
in
1,457 Posts
No, you won't get weaker. You need to adjust your training zones, because you won't be able to hit your low-altitude numbers. You'll be creating the same amount of physiological stress and adaptation using the lower numbers.
If by the end of the summer you get your high-altitude FTP up to 325w, then you'll be jamming along at 350w when you get back down to low altitude.
If by the end of the summer you get your high-altitude FTP up to 325w, then you'll be jamming along at 350w when you get back down to low altitude.
The fix to this is live high and train low - think Tenerife. Low altitude training maintains the VO2 capability and muscle mass while the 18 hours plus of high altitude living plus lower intensity training induces the other effects.
And not all athletes respond the same with some doing much worse at altitude and getting no bump in fitness at sea level.
The other aspect of altitude is that recovery is much harder due to less oxygen. Some use oxygen generators to facilitate recovery.
Nonsense
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,918
Bikes: Affirmative
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 880 Post(s)
Liked 541 Times
in
237 Posts
I know a guy that used to sleep in an altitude tent. FWIW he no longer races, I would wager the hit to his sex life was bigger than the bump in ftp.
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,001
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
For the first time this season, went out today to do VO2Max hill climb intervals. Instead of the standard 5 (or 6) x 5 min w/ 5 min recoveries, I went with 6 x 4 min @ z5. I really like these intervals, but I also dread them. Especially the first time of the season.
As it turns out, the day went very well. I did 6 intervals, and every single one was within 2 W (!) of 120% of FTP, or higher. Next time I do them I should definitely be doing 5 min work intervals.
Of course, the key is to be able to maintain a sense of equinimity in training, since there will always be days when one is a bit stronger or a bit weaker, but still, it is easier to enjoy days like these.
As it turns out, the day went very well. I did 6 intervals, and every single one was within 2 W (!) of 120% of FTP, or higher. Next time I do them I should definitely be doing 5 min work intervals.
Of course, the key is to be able to maintain a sense of equinimity in training, since there will always be days when one is a bit stronger or a bit weaker, but still, it is easier to enjoy days like these.