Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-07-13, 09:16 AM   #26
Grumpy McTrumpy
gmt
 
Grumpy McTrumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Bikes:
Posts: 12,461
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
This Tour has taken a big turn for the boring. The bully is going to win, with or without his doped-up team.

AC sans whatever he was on a few years ago can't do jack about it. None of the "big guns" can. Echoes of Postal.

The green jersey is locked up.

So it's back to waiting for sprint stages. At least those don't require dope.
Grumpy McTrumpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-13, 09:19 AM   #27
Grumpy McTrumpy
gmt
 
Grumpy McTrumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Bikes:
Posts: 12,461
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AzTallRider View Post
Is it possible for team-wide doping to go undetected for an extend period of time, given the current state of testing and "information insecurity"? Would it need to be something new?
since the postal doping "program" required complicity by the UCI in order to succeed, then whatever the new "program" is could also be done with a similar handshake agreement.
Grumpy McTrumpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-13, 09:26 AM   #28
echappist 
fuggitivo solitario
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Arlington, VA
Bikes:
Posts: 8,822
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Homebrew01 View Post
But ... But ... But, he never tested positive.
echappist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-13, 09:31 AM   #29
echappist 
fuggitivo solitario
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Arlington, VA
Bikes:
Posts: 8,822
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy View Post
since the postal doping "program" required complicity by the UCI in order to succeed, then whatever the new "program" is could also be done with a similar handshake agreement.
alas my point about Cookson and Sky.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racer Ex View Post
So we just need a lot of stages with 5 mountains to make this interesting.
what's the bet that Porte is told to "sandbag it" after yesterday's effort? losing 10+ minutes on a stage when every other GC rider makes it...

also, i hope Vaughters post Martin's SRM file to show just what it took today. My bet is that they probably went along at 5.7-5.8w/kg on the climbs. Martin is one of my more "favored" riders, and i do hope that he's at least clean.
echappist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-13, 10:26 AM   #30
Racer Ex 
Resident Alien
 
Racer Ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Bikes:
Posts: 12,618
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by echappist View Post
also, i hope Vaughters post Martin's SRM file to show just what it took today. My bet is that they probably went along at 5.7-5.8w/kg on the climbs. Martin is one of my more "favored" riders, and i do hope that he's at least clean.
Vaughters>Brailsford.

I've met and talked to a lot of people in and around Garmin. If someone was doping on that team I'd be really surprised and would put it down to a case of someone being a dumbass as opposed to some systematic thing.

Garmin IS transparent...one of my teammates wrote the recent book on them and pretty much said he never ran into a closed door. Sky on the other hand played a lot of "today isn't good for us" with journalists.
Racer Ex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-13, 10:46 AM   #31
Fat Boy
Wheelsuck
 
Fat Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 6,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've heard of riders that don't like Vaughters as a person/manager. I've never heard of an issue of him on the issue of doping. He's been there. He knows what it's all about. He knows how much he doesn't like it on a very personal level.

At this point, the only thing that it going to stop the nonsense is the riders themselves. They need to self-police, and they don't. They need to stand up and criticize the _s4!7_ out of Sky. Don't ride with them. Let them ride a couple minutes up the road from the rest of the peloton. Make a farce out of the race until it changes. They won't do that, though, and what we saw tomorrow will continue.
Fat Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-13, 11:16 AM   #32
Racer Ex 
Resident Alien
 
Racer Ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Bikes:
Posts: 12,618
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Boy View Post
and what we saw tomorrow will continue.
While you're in the future, could you pick up a WSG and get me some closing prices
Racer Ex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-13, 11:43 AM   #33
Fat Boy
Wheelsuck
 
Fat Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 6,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racer Ex View Post
While you're in the future, could you pick up a WSG and get me some closing prices
I can only get my Delorean to 88mph every so often. You have to put in your orders ahead of time.



Ummmm....ya....how about 'yesterday'.
Fat Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-13, 12:30 PM   #34
echappist 
fuggitivo solitario
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Arlington, VA
Bikes:
Posts: 8,822
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
i thought this tweet from JV was sorta funny

Quote:
Jonathan Vaughters@Vaughters4h
We need a panda, now. Anyone? Panda! Hurry the F up with the Panda!
and then someone posted this from Ireland



all of this, of course, in reference to

echappist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-13, 01:19 PM   #35
chasm54
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Bikes:
Posts: 8,657
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Today was interesting. Sky not looking so Postal with Porte failing utterly to repeat anything like yesterday's effort and Froome fending for himself. Long way to go, this isn't close to being over.

If Sky are doping it has to be institutionalised and systematic. Given the number of riders that have passed through their hands - and the fact that some of them have left in slightly acrimonious circumstances - I'd say it might be difficult to keep that quiet. And apart from a twenty-minute period yesterday, nobody has done anything superhuman.

Not planning to jump to any conclusions, personally. Let's wait and see what happens.
chasm54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-13, 01:32 PM   #36
gsteinb
out walking the earth
 
gsteinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: teh Jersey
Bikes:
Posts: 19,947
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 91 Post(s)
what I know is I'm not smart enough or connected enough to know if doping is done systematically, with a wink and a nod, or with riders going rogue.
gsteinb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-13, 01:37 PM   #37
mattm
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Bikes:
Posts: 13,889
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 209 Post(s)
Wish Movistar had traded off attacks on that last climb to try to put Froome into the red, but alas there were only a few half-moves from Quintana and that was it.

Then (it seemed like) Valverde yelled at him, and he backed off.. why??
__________________
cat 1.

blog
mattm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-13, 03:48 PM   #38
thechemist
In the Pain Cave
 
thechemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Bikes:
Posts: 1,669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattm View Post
Wish Movistar had traded off attacks on that last climb to try to put Froome into the red, but alas there were only a few half-moves from Quintana and that was it.

Then (it seemed like) Valverde yelled at him, and he backed off.. why??
Yea, it really is starting to look interesting. Movistar looked pretty good out there!
thechemist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-13, 03:56 PM   #39
chasm54
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Bikes:
Posts: 8,657
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsteinb View Post
what I know is I'm not smart enough or connected enough to know if doping is done systematically, with a wink and a nod, or with riders going rogue.
But if it's riders going rogue, the suggestion that the Sky team's consistency and collective efficiency is in itself evidence of doping would be unsustainable, wouldn't it? And given their legendary attention to detail (I don't think there's anything fake about that) I'd be pretty surprised if they weren't able to spot suspicious signs in the numbers turned out by a rogue rider. My view is, if they are doping it is probably organised by, or at least enabled by, the management.

And if they aren't, we'll see some more disasters like Porte's, today.
chasm54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-13, 03:33 PM   #40
grolby
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Bikes:
Posts: 9,376
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 106 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by echappist View Post
what's the bet that Porte is told to "sandbag it" after yesterday's effort? losing 10+ minutes on a stage when every other GC rider makes it...
This is the problem... you can read what happened Saturday and Sunday pretty much however you want it. If you want to believe Sky's performance yesterday is definitive evidence of doping, you just say that Porte and the other Sky domestiques were told to ride badly today to prevent suspicion. If you are more optimistic, or at least more cautious in proclaiming the climb to Ax-3-Domaines as evidence of doping, you see yesterdays stage as a counterpoint, the expected result of a massive effort the day before.

I just don't think it's remotely reasonable to draw a firm conclusion either way. Personally, before Porte and especially Froome went on the rampage Saturday, I didn't think the Sky's vaunted train was looking all that impressive, and indeed if you subtract Porte's and Froome's efforts they didn't actually look to be "not normal," as a squad, not even as impressive as last year. And the domestiques who rode hard Saturday seemed to pay for it yesterday.

So I don't know what to think. I'm skeptical about the ride Froome did on Saturday, but I felt a good deal better about it after yesterday's stage. I'm also pretty skeptical about the supposition that Sky is on an organized program; most of the riders sure don't look like it. I think the biggest problem is, as discussed already, Sky's unwillingness to be transparent and release the data. They claim that it's too "noisy" and will be abused by alleged pseudoscientists, but without the data those same pseudoscientists are just going to estimate the numbers, and there's a lot more noise in those estimations. The problem with Sky is that, even if they are clean, they are acting as though they have something to hide, and that just isn't going to help them in the modern environment of skepticism and suspicion.
grolby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-13, 03:55 PM   #41
chasm54
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Bikes:
Posts: 8,657
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
interesting podcast in which Mike Creed gives his opinion on Sky, and Froome, and doping. Listen from about 15 minutes in - as long as you don't mind bad language.
chasm54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-13, 06:23 PM   #42
Racer Ex 
Resident Alien
 
Racer Ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Bikes:
Posts: 12,618
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by grolby View Post
I just don't think it's remotely reasonable to draw a firm conclusion either way...the problem with Sky is that, even if they are clean, they are acting as though they have something to hide, and that just isn't going to help them in the modern environment of skepticism and suspicion.
Head meet nail.

Their actions are deju vu Armstrong 2.0 to a scary degree.

Whether or not they are doping is almost secondary to them being completely full of sheet. I mean they were shocked to find out that the former Rabobank doctor they hired had a background of doping? And it took them a season to finally fire that guy while they were tossing guys like Julich under the bus to look like they were doing something while running away from questions.

They are transparent except they aren't going to give you any data or have an imbedded reporter. Especially if it's the guy who broke omerta.

And yes, anyone who questions them are psuedo scientists and wankers.

Full of sheet.
Racer Ex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-13, 01:49 AM   #43
chasm54
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Bikes:
Posts: 8,657
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racer Ex View Post
Head meet nail.

Their actions are deju vu Armstrong 2.0 to a scary degree.

Whether or not they are doping is almost secondary to them being completely full of sheet. I mean they were shocked to find out that the former Rabobank doctor they hired had a background of doping? And it took them a season to finally fire that guy while they were tossing guys like Julich under the bus to look like they were doing something while running away from questions.

They are transparent except they aren't going to give you any data or have an imbedded reporter. Especially if it's the guy who broke omerta.

And yes, anyone who questions them are psuedo scientists and wankers.

Full of sheet.
Yes, I agree with this. Whatever the truth about their cleanliness, Brailsford and his inner circle are arrogant, inward-looking and self-righteous. And they can't make up their minds about where they stand. To my knowledge they have twice invited journalists into the team only to think better of it, which looks appalling.

The only things that give me hope that they are just wankers, rather than cheats, are the huge difficulty of keeping a systematic doping programme quiet, and the fact that with the exception of last year's TdF, which suited them, they haven't looked remotely invulnerable. See the Vuelta last year, the Classics and Giro this year, Porte and Kiriyenka being toast on Sunday after their supposedly superhuman efforts on Saturday. If they are going Postal, they aren't actually very good at it.

Last edited by chasm54; 07-09-13 at 02:03 AM.
chasm54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-13, 12:53 AM   #44
mattm
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Bikes:
Posts: 13,889
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 209 Post(s)
Enough about Sky, how about that sprint today?! You know, the other guys that are doping..

If someone had done that to Cav, it seems like he'd be whining about it to no end. I guess the judges didn't seem to think much of it, so be it.

To be sure it wasn't an abnormal move in a sprint, but if someone isn't ready for a lean-in like that it seems like a dick move. It seemed like he did it on purpose to say "F you for letting this gap open in front of me, wanka".. maybe didn't expect dude to actually go down but still.

Anyway great to see Kittel upset the more obvious winners on the day!!
__________________
cat 1.

blog
mattm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-13, 03:36 AM   #45
chasm54
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Bikes:
Posts: 8,657
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Having watched it again, I'd say it was a deliberate block by Veelers. he looks back at Cav before drifting right.
chasm54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-13, 09:38 AM   #46
mattm
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Bikes:
Posts: 13,889
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 209 Post(s)
So T. Martin had blood on his crotch, nice.
__________________
cat 1.

blog
mattm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-13, 11:23 AM   #47
thechemist
In the Pain Cave
 
thechemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Bikes:
Posts: 1,669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattm View Post
So T. Martin had blood on his crotch, nice.
Youch...what was cause or am I just naive?

Sucks for Cav..right or wrong in what he did yesterday fans did a disservice to cycling.
thechemist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-13, 11:41 AM   #48
mattm
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Bikes:
Posts: 13,889
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 209 Post(s)
Nasty saddle sore I assume.. trying not to form a mental image!!
__________________
cat 1.

blog
mattm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-13, 12:32 PM   #49
MDcatV
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 6,760
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
i'm so farkin' clueless i had no idea what this thread was about.

froomestrong. riding up the finishing climb head and shoulders above noted climbers contador (who hasnt got it), valverde, rodriguez, quintana, and others by over a minute. without ever really attacking, just lifting pace. not normal.

froomestrong. fighting a raging headwind he was able to nearly beat the 2 time TT world champion (who rode hours earlier when the headwind wasnt prominent). again, not normal.

froomestrong. going from someone no one had ever heard of to nearly winning a GT (vuelta 2011<?>) at the age of 26 and finishing 2nd in the TdF a year later. again, again, not normal.

if i were saxo or movistar ds, i'd be on the phone calling for a top secret meeting and collaboration. i wouldnt invite belkin because i think they're happy just being there with a shot at the podium.
MDcatV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-13, 01:31 PM   #50
thechemist
In the Pain Cave
 
thechemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Bikes:
Posts: 1,669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Constantly improving in the young rider category like 11th than 6th(TdF). 2nd at british national TT in 2010. Top 15 finishes in 2011(i think it was 4th for the vuelta) on some big tours. 3rd in olympic TT. I mean sure it looks like he is doping and I probably have some tinted glasses as I do like the guy I just don't understand all the undue hate the guy has received?


edit: I take that back, wiggins was also not well received. Maybe it is the team?
thechemist is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:54 PM.