Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,252
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Bikecult.com has a chart of the various attempts on the "one hour" record over the past 125 years. The slowest one hour times were those of the riders who attempted the record "the hard way": on a bike with traditional geometry, riding in a traditional sprinter's position on a track near sea level.

    It was interesting to see how slowly progress has been made on the "traditional" hour's record. No funny bikes. No funny riding positions. No advantage from riding at high altitude. The slow gains made in the traditional hour record, and the unwillingness of most modern riders to attempt breaking it, suggests that Boardman's time in 2000 may be approaching the outer limit of human ability.


    The "Traditional" Hour's Record - Key Times


    2000 Boardman 30.6 mph

    1967 Braeke 29.8 mph

    1956 Anquetil 28.6 mph

    1933 Richard 27.7 mph

    1912 Egg 26.9 mph


    It took eight decades to advance the record less than 4 mph. And five decades to advance the record 2 mph. That suggests, under "traditional" rules, it is unlikely that any rider in 2005 can complete a "traditional" hour going faster than about 31 mph. Could Lance be the guy who proves the human limit has not been met?
    Last edited by alanbikehouston; 02-26-05 at 11:37 AM.

  2. #2
    El Diablo 2Rodies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Austin Tx, Ex So Cal
    My Bikes
    Cannondale CAAD8/Record 10s, Felt DA700 Chorus 10s,
    Posts
    2,752
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm still confused about one thing. If the air is so thin at altitude wouldn't it be easier to achieve a faster time at sea level? I can't imagine that the aero advantage would be that much better in thinner air.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    328
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    With power being roughly a function of velocity cubed, a small increase in speed requires a huge increase in power. At 10,000 ft the air density is ~ 70% of the sea level value. That's a 30% reduction in aero resistance! Of course, 30% less air to breathe

  4. #4
    El Diablo 2Rodies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Austin Tx, Ex So Cal
    My Bikes
    Cannondale CAAD8/Record 10s, Felt DA700 Chorus 10s,
    Posts
    2,752
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by boyze
    With power being roughly a function of velocity cubed, a small increase in speed requires a huge increase in power. At 10,000 ft the air density is ~ 70% of the sea level value. That's a 30% reduction in aero resistance! Of course, 30% less air to breathe

    Which was my point. I'm surprised that the loss of wind resistance is a great benifiet than the handicap of less dense air. It's obviously the case but suprising non the less.

  5. #5
    Senior Member rich007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NJ/NYC
    My Bikes
    2008 Salsa Fargo
    Posts
    420
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 2Rodies
    Which was my point. I'm surprised that the loss of wind resistance is a great benifiet than the handicap of less dense air. It's obviously the case but suprising non the less.
    Because, you can always acclimatize to altitude by spending (and training) up high... In about 4-6 weeks your blood becomes more dense with red blood cells and that allows you to produce 'almost' the same power output as at the sea level, with the benefit of lesser air resistance...

  6. #6
    El Diablo 2Rodies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Austin Tx, Ex So Cal
    My Bikes
    Cannondale CAAD8/Record 10s, Felt DA700 Chorus 10s,
    Posts
    2,752
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rich007
    Because, you can always acclimatize to altitude by spending (and training) up high... In about 4-6 weeks your blood becomes more dense with red blood cells and that allows you to produce 'almost' the same power output as at the sea level, with the benefit of lesser air resistance...

    Gottcha, thanks!

  7. #7
    Senior Member CAAD5AL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    SLC, UT
    Posts
    692
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's amazing stuff - I can't believe how long the 1967 record held, and only to be beaten by .8mph, and in the days of EPO no less.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,252
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CAAD5AL
    That's amazing stuff - I can't believe how long the 1967 record held, and only to be beaten by .8mph, and in the days of EPO no less.
    It is my impression that there have been very few attempts to break the 1967 record. That record was set at sea level, using a traditional style of road bike, and a traditional riding position. Most of the record attempts since that time have involved riders who chose to use either a "funny" bike, a "funny" riding position, or who chose to ride at high altitude.

    Sometimes boxers, even world champion boxers, are accused of "dodging" fights with a tough opponent. I'm inclined to guess that guys such as Lance and Ullrich might be a bit nervous about going after the "traditional" hour record. The "traditional" hour measures a rider not only against the best riders of this generation, but allows a direct comparison with the best riders of prior generations. What if one of today's "best" riders attempted this record, and ended up with a "28.5 MPH ride"? Might be a bit of an embarrassment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •