Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-28-13, 01:26 AM   #26
bigfred 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NZ
Bikes: More than 1, but, less than S-1
Posts: 3,834
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by carleton View Post
What about the non-round shaped posts? Those cause the most issues that I've seen (even from 170lb guys). The posts will slip into the frame.

Also, the 1-bolt seat clamp systems that allow for minute adjustments, but are prone to tilting when "on the rivet". The 2-bolt systems don't tilt.

This is an example:



vs




Is it a game of ounces where they choose these posts because they use less metal hardware?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tetonrider View Post
i got it...but then you concluded with a question wondering if decisions are about weight.

i am bolt-agnostic; i currently have a few bikes with 1-bolt posts and a few with 2-bolt setups. all else equal, a 1-bolt setup IS lighter. i find them a bit touchier to set up because multiple things can change at once, but i generally don't have a problem with the angle changing while riding if torqued properly. could be a function of my weight and riding style, though.
It was Carleton who initially posed the question about the single bolt systems.

Your point about the weight of Specialized components makes some of their decissions all the more confusing.

They truly are just pandering to the "style" they believe people will buy. But, they're there to make money, not convince us that what we actually need isn't what we think we want.
__________________
Birth Certificate, Passport, Marriage License Driver's License and Residency Permit all say I'm a Fred. I guess there's no denying it.
bigfred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-13, 01:34 AM   #27
carpediemracing
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tariffville, CT
Bikes: Tsunami Bikes
Posts: 14,579
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 66 Post(s)
I think that some ISP frames are designed such that the ISP bit can absorb some shock? I'm thinking of the Giant and I think a Time frame?

Of course I'm the one that used an adapter shim so I could use a 27.2 in my 31.6 ST Cannondale, so you're preaching to the choir.

I guess this will nip my desire to go looking for an aero zero-setback 27.2 seat post for a month or two.
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
carpediemracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-13, 01:36 AM   #28
tetonrider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 3,527
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 106 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigfred View Post
It was Carleton who initially posed the question about the single bolt systems.

Your point about the weight of Specialized components makes some of their decissions all the more confusing.

They truly are just pandering to the "style" they believe people will buy. But, they're there to make money, not convince us that what we actually need isn't what we think we want.
yessir…but it was carelton's post i initially quoted (with the reference to weight and posts and trade-offs). sorry for thinking it was you when you later replied questioning it.

i'm not sure i would use the term pandering. pretty sure most people realize specialized is a company in it for the money.

also, i was just sharing an anecdote that even at their top-level bike they still have to make some trade-offs. the conversation i had with the engineers is actually how impressed they are (and these are skeptical types) with the way those decisions are made. the product manager ultimately makes the call.

yeah, seems weird to have a heavier post (why not have a vibration-absorbing AND light post?) on one's top-end bike, but when you think that they have actual production costs and margins that they want to hit…and when they've determined that $10,500 is the sweet-spot and not $10,650, they have to trim somewhere. the point from the engineers was that to their amazement they will take the input of the engineers and, say, not scale back on the quality of the suspension in this case but rather where it will do the least harm to the ride characteristics.

i found the anecdote interesting. big companies often get a bad rap when it comes to making decisions purely on numbers. was nice to hear that it is not only about the #s for them. these are guys who are not without options in terms of employment, so they were pleased that their work has an impact on the bikes that are offered for sale.

anyway, back somewhat to our regularly-scheduled topic: in this example, the post is not a proprietary size so it is easy enough for people to see the included post and buy a new one. i tend to prefer bikes with standard size posts as i usually swap them out for something that better meets my needs, but in the cases where i have bikes with proprietary posts at least there is some semblance of consistency (aero road frame gets an aero post; TT bike has an aero post).
tetonrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-13, 10:46 PM   #29
Racer Ex 
Resident Alien
 
Racer Ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Bikes:
Posts: 12,526
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Lose some weight lard butt. Only half of the proprietary posts I've had slipped.
Racer Ex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-13, 11:17 PM   #30
bigfred 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NZ
Bikes: More than 1, but, less than S-1
Posts: 3,834
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I guess we can simplify it to: They keep building them, because we (the greater cycling pop. in general) keep buying them.
__________________
Birth Certificate, Passport, Marriage License Driver's License and Residency Permit all say I'm a Fred. I guess there's no denying it.
bigfred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-13, 11:24 AM   #31
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Bikes:
Posts: 13,135
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racer Ex View Post
Lose some weight lard butt. Only half of the proprietary posts I've had slipped.
Hahahaha!

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigfred View Post
I guess we can simplify it to: They keep building them, because we (the greater cycling pop. in general) keep buying them.
True.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtrob View Post
Roadies can run tempo all year as that's what humans were designed for. If you want to be a cheetah, lay around and lick your paws more.
carleton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-13, 11:53 AM   #32
JerrySTL
Senior Member
 
JerrySTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Near St. Louis, Missouri
Bikes: Giant Defy Advanced, Windsor Tourist
Posts: 1,353
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
My Giant Defy Advanced has a CF teardrop shaped seatpost for an 'aero' advantage. Of course I usually have a big seat bag hanging behind it disturbing whatever area advantage there is.

I had to buy a $35 adapter kit from Giant so that I could use my workstand on the post.

Then like a big dummy I managed to over-torque the seat post clamp and ruin the seatpost. Instead of just buying any 27.2 post, I had to special order the teardrop shaped post for $200. I also bought a small torque wrench and some Tacx Carbon Prep so I won't make that mistake again.
JerrySTL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-13, 12:05 PM   #33
gsteinb
out walking the earth
 
gsteinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: teh Jersey
Bikes:
Posts: 19,851
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
in a decade we'll look at ISPs the way we view scott drop-ins and briko glasses
gsteinb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-13, 12:09 PM   #34
bigfred 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NZ
Bikes: More than 1, but, less than S-1
Posts: 3,834
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsteinb View Post
in a decade we'll look at ISPs the way we view scott drop-ins and briko glasses
That's fine. As long as we don't put them in the same category as Factory Pilots.
__________________
Birth Certificate, Passport, Marriage License Driver's License and Residency Permit all say I'm a Fred. I guess there's no denying it.
bigfred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-13, 12:46 PM   #35
carpediemracing
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tariffville, CT
Bikes: Tsunami Bikes
Posts: 14,579
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 66 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsteinb View Post
in a decade we'll look at ISPs the way we view scott drop-ins and briko glasses
Farg. You ruined my plans for the spring. I'm going to take the Drop-Ins off my bike now and take the inserts out of the Brikos.
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
carpediemracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-13, 02:46 PM   #36
Andy STi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bend, OR
Bikes:
Posts: 542
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by misterwaterfall View Post
what if i'm in the drops doing sst dirty 30 over unders at 90% ftp while my seat post slips on my way to the race?
perfect!
Andy STi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-13, 04:52 PM   #37
Ygduf 
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Ygduf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Posts: 9,396
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
want
__________________

strava.com/athletes/ygduf
Ygduf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-13, 06:46 PM   #38
bigfred 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NZ
Bikes: More than 1, but, less than S-1
Posts: 3,834
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Classic
__________________
Birth Certificate, Passport, Marriage License Driver's License and Residency Permit all say I'm a Fred. I guess there's no denying it.
bigfred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-13, 07:06 PM   #39
LesterOfPuppets
cowboy, steel horse, etc
 
LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rock Springs, WY
Bikes: My War
Posts: 26,688
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 198 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by carleton View Post
So, why the move to proprietary seatposts? As a heavy guy that has had several proprietary posts slip/tilt during training and racing, they simply don't work as well as the standard 27.2 posts. I won't even consider buying a frame that doesn't use 27.2.
If you go way back even 27.2 was kinda rare.

25.4 is probably the most common size over time, including cheep bikes.

Larger sizes came about as the desire for larger OD, thinner-walled tubing came about.

People are saying this is a 41 thing but I'm thinking both the 10 and the 229 would yield better answers than 41 or 33.
LesterOfPuppets is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-13, 07:11 PM   #40
botto 
.
 
botto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 40,362
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsteinb View Post
in a decade we'll look at ISPs the way we view scott drop-ins and briko glasses
botto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-13, 10:24 PM   #41
mollusk
Elite Fred
 
mollusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edge City
Bikes: 2009 Spooky (cracked frame), 2006 Curtlo, 2002 Lemond (current race bike) Zurich, 1987 Serotta Colorado, 1986 Cannondale for commuting, a 1984 Cannondale on loan to my son
Posts: 10,762
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
I have some of the bad player seat posts on some of my bikes. My old (1986) Serotta "Sunday Driver" has an aero Campy C-Record seat post. Gorgeous piece of metal, but very heavy. The whole C-Record group is heavy, but shifts like butter and is visually pleasing.

My rain bike that I bought on Ebay has the notorious USE Alien seat post. That only went into fail mode once and not sliding into the seat tube. The bit that holds the seat in place loosened up. It is currently out on loan to a team mate that had his bike stolen.

My race bike has a straight Thomson Elite. Never a problem.
mollusk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-13, 11:21 PM   #42
Skyline516
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: College Park, MD
Bikes: Ridley Noah RS, Old steel Trek
Posts: 74
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I purchased my noah rs because I was seduced by the aero stylings and fancy space-age look which included the aesthetics of the seatpost. Companies take advantage of those thoughts to get people to buy their stuff and it worked, in my case. Personally though, I have not had a problem since I assembled it and I weigh 100 kilos.
Skyline516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:04 PM.