Lifelong Bib # Assignments
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 3,215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
One cloth number comment, a couple of local cross Series decided on series long cloth numbers this year, and after a few months some of them are starting to look pretty ragged.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 557
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
We get a separate cross number (tyvek type) for all the cross races here too. Our cloth road numbers hold up quite well.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Ontario
Posts: 740
Bikes: T1, S2, P3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
USAC currently requires numbers.
But what we're REALLY after is this:
Random spectator along the course can punch in any bib number into an phone or iPad app and find out who the rider is. The announcer (that no one listens to, ever) can do the same thing.
Riders can create their own publicity profile that the spectator sees including prior results, stats, photos, and such superfluous things as "I ride in honor of my friend who has cancer." Or "Team party after the race at XX Brew Pub! Join us."
Or other meaningful message (that we would sell the gsteinb for $5 plus shipping and handling).
Can't do that with chips.
I suppose you could create a hand held scanner device. Let me know how that goes.
But what we're REALLY after is this:
Random spectator along the course can punch in any bib number into an phone or iPad app and find out who the rider is. The announcer (that no one listens to, ever) can do the same thing.
Riders can create their own publicity profile that the spectator sees including prior results, stats, photos, and such superfluous things as "I ride in honor of my friend who has cancer." Or "Team party after the race at XX Brew Pub! Join us."
Or other meaningful message (that we would sell the gsteinb for $5 plus shipping and handling).
Can't do that with chips.
I suppose you could create a hand held scanner device. Let me know how that goes.
With chips you get instant results though. To use your phone example a spectator could not just look for numbers, but see the race in real time if its passing a timer (ie a crit or circuit course). Your example assumes a number is published to the name somewhere, which around here it isn't. A chip you just go on sportstats/mylaps and you get results immediately.
#29
Senior Member
Interesting thoughts.
One thing that can be changed but is currently a rule is that numbers have to be on a white background (and I think the number is supposed to be black). This is USAC any way.
A new rule for this year is that promoters are responsible for getting results. Not just posting them, actually getting them. This means officials won't care about leading or trailing numbers as long as they can keep straight who is lapped, who got a free lap, etc. The results are all up to the promoter. If the promoter thinks that having a 9 digit number is fine then it's fine - it'll be the promoter's responsibility to get results.
I've never used chips, basically scared off by the buy in (just like I've been scared by the buy in for a FinishLynx system). What is the chip system in FL?
I pay about $1200-1500 for a 7 week series with 6 fields, two fields with 125 field limits (but one field of 50). I issue new numbers each week after having some riders try to jump in races with prior weeks' numbers. For liability reasons I can't have that so therefore new numbers weekly (and I try and mix up the leading number each week).
One thing that can be changed but is currently a rule is that numbers have to be on a white background (and I think the number is supposed to be black). This is USAC any way.
A new rule for this year is that promoters are responsible for getting results. Not just posting them, actually getting them. This means officials won't care about leading or trailing numbers as long as they can keep straight who is lapped, who got a free lap, etc. The results are all up to the promoter. If the promoter thinks that having a 9 digit number is fine then it's fine - it'll be the promoter's responsibility to get results.
I've never used chips, basically scared off by the buy in (just like I've been scared by the buy in for a FinishLynx system). What is the chip system in FL?
I pay about $1200-1500 for a 7 week series with 6 fields, two fields with 125 field limits (but one field of 50). I issue new numbers each week after having some riders try to jump in races with prior weeks' numbers. For liability reasons I can't have that so therefore new numbers weekly (and I try and mix up the leading number each week).
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
#30
out walking the earth
I actually rode the NY Spring Series as #1 as defending champion one year. That was actually kind of cool.
#31
starting pistol means war
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,150
Bikes: Cervelo R3
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
We bought a system from MyLaps many moons ago. Purchased it as a local association for the whole state to use (I was on the board as VP for 5 years), but as we (promoter I work for) started developing our own software to get specific needs addressed, we decided to buy it from the LA.
Since then, another promoter has bought their own equipment as well
Since then, another promoter has bought their own equipment as well
#32
Old & Getting Older Racer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,343
Bikes: Bicycle Transportation: 2022 Hyundai Kona Electric, 2019 Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
5 Posts
Hi, here's an end user perspective. For a few years, a local promoter was also running his own sanctioning body (like OBRA and ABRA). He had a deal where you bought a year's worth of entries (it was a very good deal if you raced a lot) and you got a permanent, cloth number. I did that for two years and I liked it.
I liked:
Being able to pin on my number the night before
Having the same number for all of his races -- no more, "What number am I?"
Not having to add excessively to my box full of numbers in my garage
The promoter dealt with
People without permanent numbers, which was the majority of racers
People forgetting numbers -- I forgot once and they gave me the same number but in Tyvek (which became my spare number)
Since you only got the permanent number if you bought the full year deal, the promoter did not have to with people trying to sneak into races.
Now the promoter does USAC sanctioned races so the permanent numbers are gone. Also, I hate that USAC or our local USAC body (SCNCA) requires a different number for every race. It seems like such a waste. As a rider, pinning on multiple numbers, if I'm doing multiple races, sucks. I presume promoters hate buying so many numbers when they know statistically, certain races have large numbers of people who do multiple races. For instance, a large percent of 55+/65+ guys also race 50+ at criteriums where they schedule those categories. That's something like 30 racers. A similar thing happens with 50+ and 45+.
I'd love to have a permanent number again and an alphanumeric or color coding scheme would be fine with me.
I liked:
Being able to pin on my number the night before
Having the same number for all of his races -- no more, "What number am I?"
Not having to add excessively to my box full of numbers in my garage
The promoter dealt with
People without permanent numbers, which was the majority of racers
People forgetting numbers -- I forgot once and they gave me the same number but in Tyvek (which became my spare number)
Since you only got the permanent number if you bought the full year deal, the promoter did not have to with people trying to sneak into races.
Now the promoter does USAC sanctioned races so the permanent numbers are gone. Also, I hate that USAC or our local USAC body (SCNCA) requires a different number for every race. It seems like such a waste. As a rider, pinning on multiple numbers, if I'm doing multiple races, sucks. I presume promoters hate buying so many numbers when they know statistically, certain races have large numbers of people who do multiple races. For instance, a large percent of 55+/65+ guys also race 50+ at criteriums where they schedule those categories. That's something like 30 racers. A similar thing happens with 50+ and 45+.
I'd love to have a permanent number again and an alphanumeric or color coding scheme would be fine with me.
__________________
Thanks.
Cleave
"Real men still wear pink."
Visit my blog at https://cleavesblant.wordpress.com/
Lightning Velo Cycling Club: https://www.lightningvelo.org/
Learn about our Green Dream Home at https://www.lawville.org/
Thanks.
Cleave
"Real men still wear pink."
Visit my blog at https://cleavesblant.wordpress.com/
Lightning Velo Cycling Club: https://www.lightningvelo.org/
Learn about our Green Dream Home at https://www.lawville.org/
#33
Elite Fred
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edge City
Posts: 10,945
Bikes: 2009 Spooky (cracked frame), 2006 Curtlo, 2002 Lemond (current race bike) Zurich, 1987 Serotta Colorado, 1986 Cannondale for commuting, a 1984 Cannondale on loan to my son
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times
in
19 Posts
Chips are great for 99.9% of the time, but the chip is never placed at the leading edge of the tire crossing the line. You still need numbers and cameras for that when it is really close. Until the winner of the race is defined as having the first chip to cross the line we will need the conventional things as well.
Having a number pinned on helps the officials with DQ'ing riders that are breaking rules. The official on the moto can't read your chip number.
Having a number pinned on helps the officials with DQ'ing riders that are breaking rules. The official on the moto can't read your chip number.
#34
starting pistol means war
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,150
Bikes: Cervelo R3
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Chips are great for 99.9% of the time, but the chip is never placed at the leading edge of the tire crossing the line. You still need numbers and cameras for that when it is really close. Until the winner of the race is defined as having the first chip to cross the line we will need the conventional things as well.
Having a number pinned on helps the officials with DQ'ing riders that are breaking rules. The official on the moto can't read your chip number.
Having a number pinned on helps the officials with DQ'ing riders that are breaking rules. The official on the moto can't read your chip number.
Yes numbers are still important, for line judges and moto-officials and back-up to what the chip says. Also, a chip could have gone bad and having the rider scored by the s/f judge gives us a better chance of getting results 100% correct. Not something we could ever say in the days before transponders!
I hope Jamie can find a solution for Michigan. If I think of any ideas, I'll post.
#35
Elite Fred
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edge City
Posts: 10,945
Bikes: 2009 Spooky (cracked frame), 2006 Curtlo, 2002 Lemond (current race bike) Zurich, 1987 Serotta Colorado, 1986 Cannondale for commuting, a 1984 Cannondale on loan to my son
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times
in
19 Posts
Chip timing is not perfect, but it is really close to perfect and way better than most everything else. It just bothers me that it doesn't conform exactly to what the rules say about finishing.
Maybe long term we can think about having race jerseys for each team have a rectangle in the lower middle of the back with a contrasting background and a number (white and black work). Above that is the name of the race team clearly displayed. Now every rider is identified by team and number within the team.
Maybe long term we can think about having race jerseys for each team have a rectangle in the lower middle of the back with a contrasting background and a number (white and black work). Above that is the name of the race team clearly displayed. Now every rider is identified by team and number within the team.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,170
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
With chips you get instant results though. To use your phone example a spectator could not just look for numbers, but see the race in real time if its passing a timer (ie a crit or circuit course). Your example assumes a number is published to the name somewhere, which around here it isn't. A chip you just go on sportstats/mylaps and you get results immediately.
I know officials who've done major races that used chips for the TTs and it was a mess. I have yet to see good documentation of reliable order of finish for multiple riders in a close "photo finish", and that includes directly asking the mylaps people for it when they were trying to tell me I should consider their system for a venue where I was promoting a lot of races. Given the size of the sensor loop, I'm skeptical.
#37
Announcer
Thread Starter
Let's not get too far into the Chip Debate. That's a larger issue, and we're still in the Dark Ages technologically.
I'm just trying to work on the identification of riders by officials, spectators, and other riders.
Actually, I'm just trying to get away from pinning my teammate's number on while we're standing at the start line.
We could color code the bibs very easily, but when an official scores a race by hand (which they're still required to do), you can't have identical numbers in the pack even if the background is a different color because they're writing the numbers down in real time (though some rely on video to capture the passing peloton). It's too much to write down. And to that end, they only want to score two-digit numbers which is why they want entire fields in one number sequence when possible.
That's why they don't want, for example, a 35+ rider racing in the P-1-2 who wants to wear his 35+ number which is Yellow 135. And he's riding alongside a P-1-2 rider wearing White 135. The official would pull out a gun and shoot one of them dead rather than have to score two 135s.
I'm just trying to work on the identification of riders by officials, spectators, and other riders.
Actually, I'm just trying to get away from pinning my teammate's number on while we're standing at the start line.
We could color code the bibs very easily, but when an official scores a race by hand (which they're still required to do), you can't have identical numbers in the pack even if the background is a different color because they're writing the numbers down in real time (though some rely on video to capture the passing peloton). It's too much to write down. And to that end, they only want to score two-digit numbers which is why they want entire fields in one number sequence when possible.
That's why they don't want, for example, a 35+ rider racing in the P-1-2 who wants to wear his 35+ number which is Yellow 135. And he's riding alongside a P-1-2 rider wearing White 135. The official would pull out a gun and shoot one of them dead rather than have to score two 135s.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,910
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 327 Times
in
161 Posts
With chips you get instant results though. To use your phone example a spectator could not just look for numbers, but see the race in real time if its passing a timer (ie a crit or circuit course). Your example assumes a number is published to the name somewhere, which around here it isn't. A chip you just go on sportstats/mylaps and you get results immediately.
#40
Elite Fred
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edge City
Posts: 10,945
Bikes: 2009 Spooky (cracked frame), 2006 Curtlo, 2002 Lemond (current race bike) Zurich, 1987 Serotta Colorado, 1986 Cannondale for commuting, a 1984 Cannondale on loan to my son
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times
in
19 Posts
#43
Elite Fred
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edge City
Posts: 10,945
Bikes: 2009 Spooky (cracked frame), 2006 Curtlo, 2002 Lemond (current race bike) Zurich, 1987 Serotta Colorado, 1986 Cannondale for commuting, a 1984 Cannondale on loan to my son
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times
in
19 Posts
#46
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NorCal
Posts: 10
Bikes: Lapierre Xelious,Ciocc, 3 frames I built
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've raced bicycles and motorcycles. Racing in the MC world you get a number for life. Now it's all done with transponders, numbers are just for the programs. I like the idea of transponders for bicycle racing. You get a readout of your lap times, and you finish position.