Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-18-14, 01:55 PM   #26
gsteinb
out walking the earth
Thread Starter
 
gsteinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: teh Jersey
Bikes:
Posts: 19,820
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
nice.

it's the difference between DA and ultegra and DA SRM and FSA SRM. everything else is the same.
gsteinb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-14, 01:57 PM   #27
06SpiceRed
Powered by Di2
 
06SpiceRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Louisville/Lakwood, Colorado
Bikes: Di2 this and Di2 that
Posts: 135
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsteinb View Post
well that's ****ing deflating
Well considering the debate about weight in this case is negligible....why dont you guys argue about who spent more on the bike given the group? Why not make the case that someones wallet is that much lighter for a 1/4lb difference. I know a whole bunch of guys over at WW that are willing to swing their junk at that.
06SpiceRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-14, 02:17 PM   #28
grolby
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Bikes:
Posts: 9,190
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
So make it 2.5 lbs, and you're at 36 seconds, yeah? Assuming that math works that way, which maybe it doesn't. Geez, I couldn't even make a good case that my 18.5 lb race bike is a reasonable excuse for climbing as badly as I do. Damn.
grolby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-14, 04:18 PM   #29
aaronmcd
Senior Member
 
aaronmcd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Bikes: Cervelo S5
Posts: 2,409
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
The way I do it is assume steep enough that wind is fairly negligible, so time saved is roughly proportional to weight saved.
If total weight = 170, 1/4 pound is 1/680 of the weight. So 3600s/680 = 5 seconds. A tad less accounting for wind.
aaronmcd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-14, 04:34 PM   #30
Dave Cutter
Senior Member
 
Dave Cutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: D'uh... I am a Cutter
Bikes: '14 Trek 1.1, '10 Fuji Finest 3.0, '98 Cannondale R500, '88 Trek 360
Posts: 4,921
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 06SpiceRed View Post
Well considering the debate about weight in this case is negligible.......
I am not sure the weight argument is not really so much about weight as it is about advantage. All things being equal... any inequality is an advantage. There is no magic weight difference, or training skill, or drug enhancement that wins the race. But it all adds up. Special training, special attention to the special bicycle, weight controlled and limited by the gram.

In the end... all things being equal (and they never are)... its the heart and drive of the athlete that makes the difference.
Dave Cutter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-14, 06:53 PM   #31
Ygduf 
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Ygduf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Posts: 9,297
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsteinb View Post
well that's ****ing deflating
I quit wearing base layers on hillclimbs. those things, soaked in sweat, can weigh like 3/4 of a lb.
__________________

twitter.com/ygduf
strava.com/athletes/ygduf
Ygduf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-14, 06:56 PM   #32
Ygduf 
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Ygduf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Posts: 9,297
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronmcd View Post
The way I do it is assume steep enough that wind is fairly negligible, so time saved is roughly proportional to weight saved.
If total weight = 170, 1/4 pound is 1/680 of the weight. So 3600s/680 = 5 seconds. A tad less accounting for wind.
this is how I do it for my guestimates. also, I should go climb whiteface. I could totally top-10 that strava segment and feel good about myself
__________________

twitter.com/ygduf
strava.com/athletes/ygduf
Ygduf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-14, 08:59 PM   #33
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
Posts: 26,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ygduf View Post
I quit wearing base layers on hillclimbs. those things, soaked in sweat, can weigh like 3/4 of a lb.
I have yet to see a compelling reason to wear a base layer in any warm weather. Wicking is great, and that's what my jersey does. A base layer is going to slow the transfer of sweat to the moving air external to my clothes. The extra layer is going to add insulation, and the sweat-soaking is going to prevent any chance of wind/skin contact through most of the layer. It just makes zero sense to me. I wear a tight jersey, so sweat is immediately wicked into the fabric, the knits are advanced enough to maximize exterior surface area, while minimizing the area contacting my skin on the interior. I just don't see how another layer of fabric improves that.

Snake oil.
waterrockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-14, 09:05 PM   #34
Enthalpic
Killing Rabbits
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quantum tunneling via nanoparticles, duh.
Enthalpic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-14, 09:20 PM   #35
Ygduf 
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Ygduf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Posts: 9,297
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterrockets View Post
I have yet to see a compelling reason to wear a base layer in any warm weather. Wicking is great, and that's what my jersey does. A base layer is going to slow the transfer of sweat to the moving air external to my clothes. The extra layer is going to add insulation, and the sweat-soaking is going to prevent any chance of wind/skin contact through most of the layer. It just makes zero sense to me. I wear a tight jersey, so sweat is immediately wicked into the fabric, the knits are advanced enough to maximize exterior surface area, while minimizing the area contacting my skin on the interior. I just don't see how another layer of fabric improves that.

Snake oil.
for extra long rides I will wear under armor longsleeve upf baselayers. I feel like the white sleeves do help in harsh sun/heat.

otherwise I just wore them because I started out wearing them and prefered the feel to bib straps/jersey. And the possibility of saving road rash in my crashes (which always seemed to work on my shoulders vs. the just-bibs hip rashes I had).

ymmv
__________________

twitter.com/ygduf
strava.com/athletes/ygduf
Ygduf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-14, 09:29 PM   #36
aaronmcd
Senior Member
 
aaronmcd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Bikes: Cervelo S5
Posts: 2,409
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Yeah, base layer in warm weather = wet and gross.
aaronmcd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-14, 02:06 AM   #37
tetonrider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 3,333
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsteinb View Post
One bike weights 1/4 pound more than the other. How much of a difference does it make over an hour going up hill?
depends a bit on your weight, your bike's weight, and your expected power, but over here for a 5+ mile climb at 8+% (@ a 30' pace), 1# = just under 10" saved.

you didn't say how long your climb is (guessing ~8 miles from the 3500' gain @ 8.5%). don't know what you weigh or your power, but i'll bet that 1/4# for the climb you describe is ~4-5".

it either means nothing or a great deal, depending on your goals.

(side note, 1 extra watt is a little over 5" saved on that 30' effort--i'd guess about 8-10" saved on yours.)

this assumes aerodynamics between gear choices do not change.

how much do you weigh? is the grade consistent?
tetonrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-14, 06:02 AM   #38
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
Posts: 26,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ygduf View Post
for extra long rides I will wear under armor longsleeve upf baselayers. I feel like the white sleeves do help in harsh sun/heat.

otherwise I just wore them because I started out wearing them and prefered the feel to bib straps/jersey. And the possibility of saving road rash in my crashes (which always seemed to work on my shoulders vs. the just-bibs hip rashes I had).

ymmv
Yeah, I wear arm coolers much of the time. I'm not convinced they help with cooling, but I am convinced that they don't make me hotter (shade plus wicking at least keeps up with heat retention from insulation). I'm positive they help with UV protection though.

Base layer as tradition, I can see, but it just goes into one of the many traditions that don't make sense to me.

Actually, to go completely 41 with this thread again, I think that hairy legs are cooler than shaved because of the heat-sink properties of hair and the fact that it increases surface area for evaporation. Back when I shaved, I always felt a lot more sweaty right after I shaved off all the hair. I do keep the leg hairs shorter though, so they don't mat down in sweat.
waterrockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-14, 06:31 AM   #39
Looigi
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 8,942
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
How'd this turn into a baselayer discussion? Not complaining, and I'll add that in the hot races this year, ATOC, some of the CDDauphine, etc I saw not a single baselayer on a rider among the many (majority at some points) riding with jerseys unzipped.
Looigi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-14, 06:37 AM   #40
gsteinb
out walking the earth
Thread Starter
 
gsteinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: teh Jersey
Bikes:
Posts: 19,820
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Looigi View Post
How'd this turn into a baselayer discussion? Not complaining, and I'll add that in the hot races this year, ATOC, some of the CDDauphine, etc I saw not a single baselayer on a rider among the many (majority at some points) riding with jerseys unzipped.
217


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ygduf View Post
I quit wearing base layers on hillclimbs. those things, soaked in sweat, can weigh like 3/4 of a lb.

wet base layer = weight
gsteinb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-14, 06:41 AM   #41
Duane Behrens
Senior Member
 
Duane Behrens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Minnesota and Southern California
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac (carbon), Specialized Roubaix (carbon, wifey), Raleigh Super Course (my favorite), and 2 Centurion project bikes.
Posts: 623
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsteinb View Post
One bike weights 1/4 pound more than the other. How much of a difference does it make over an hour going up hill?
All else being equal, the train will arrive in Denver at 3:45. Glad I could help.
Duane Behrens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-14, 06:54 AM   #42
Homebrew01
Senior Member
 
Homebrew01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Posts: 19,547
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
For every 217 grams you will save 33 seconds over 41 minutes.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike
Homebrew01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-14, 08:18 AM   #43
clones2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Midwest
Bikes:
Posts: 159
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Everyone knows that being lighter makes you faster..... It's why I make sure to pisss myself before I start any longer sustained climb. Whatever it takes to get to the top faster.
clones2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-14, 08:44 AM   #44
topflightpro
Senior Member
 
topflightpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 3,894
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Base layers? I barely have a jersey on when it's hot out. The only reason I don't unzip it completely is that it starts moving around too much when unzipped - I usually have a third bottle back there.

And I'll be dripping so much sweat, I end up loosing way more than a quarter pound. In fact, I've lost as much as 5 pounds from sweating over the course of a five hour ride. (Yes, I know this is bad, but I drink as much as I can during and after the ride.)
topflightpro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-14, 10:23 AM   #45
mattm
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Bikes:
Posts: 13,651
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Homebrew01 View Post
For every 217 grams you will save 33 seconds over 41 minutes.
win
__________________
cat 1.

blog
mattm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-14, 10:25 AM   #46
gsteinb
out walking the earth
Thread Starter
 
gsteinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: teh Jersey
Bikes:
Posts: 19,820
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
1/4 pound = 20 seconds over the 8 miles. that's enough to make a difference in setting a PR
gsteinb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-14, 10:26 AM   #47
gsteinb
out walking the earth
Thread Starter
 
gsteinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: teh Jersey
Bikes:
Posts: 19,820
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ygduf View Post
I could totally top-10 that strava segment and feel good about myself
:/ I offer a place to stay at my house to just about anyone. You..you though. You're dead to me.
gsteinb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-14, 11:51 AM   #48
save10
Arrogant Roadie Punk
 
save10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: California
Bikes:
Posts: 2,353
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Good reason to wear a base layer

here is the greatest base-layer thread ever. poor Uww Emm Dee
save10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-14, 12:40 PM   #49
carpediemracing
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tariffville, CT
Bikes: Tsunami Bikes
Posts: 14,495
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Wouldn't a wet base layer simply be a net-zero gain of weight? The moisture is from sweating so the body already had it. Even if it's from dumping water on yourself you were carrying the water in the bottle.

Of course if there are rabid fans hurling buckets of water on riders then that's a different story.

Having said that I only own winter type base layers (long sleeve). I don't wear one in the summer.

I'm pretty sure that I wouldn't be able to tell the difference of 1/2 pound on my bike, and any time savings/loss in my realm of riding would be in the margin of error in terms of me trying to ride hard. 500 feet vertical per hour is about what I do in training. Weight, not significant. I do see a substantial gain/loss in pace if the wind is really strong one way or another.
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
carpediemracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-14, 01:02 PM   #50
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
Posts: 26,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by carpediemracing View Post
Wouldn't a wet base layer simply be a net-zero gain of weight? The moisture is from sweating so the body already had it. Even if it's from dumping water on yourself you were carrying the water in the bottle.
Well, the base layer is going to impede evaporation and runoff. If it was going straight to the jersey either it would be evaporating sooner, or the jersey would saturate faster than base layer + jersey, and sweat would start dripping sooner. So, while you did have it in you, once it's not, the base layer keeps it with you longer.
waterrockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:21 AM.