Racer Tech Thread
#1551
OMC
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 6,960
Bikes: Specialized Allez Sprint, Look 585, Specialized Allez Comp Race
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 461 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
49 Posts
Re: narrower bars, they felt good for one 40 mile ride so far. I'm off the bike for the next week in preparation for the Fickle Finger of Fate and its attendant PSA test, so it'll be a while before I make a final decision about cutting back the cable housings.
@hubcyclist - if you're going to change the small ring, go with a 38, the smallest that'll fit on a 130 BCD crank. My eight speed bikes both have 13-26 cassettes...but I don't race them.
@hubcyclist - if you're going to change the small ring, go with a 38, the smallest that'll fit on a 130 BCD crank. My eight speed bikes both have 13-26 cassettes...but I don't race them.
#1552
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
fwiw, i am moderately strong, generally prefer to train on a compact (it just opens up a ton of terrain, esp when i want to keep power low) and race on a standard. horses for courses.
#1554
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
June 27, 2005 is the first use I can find of eWang on this forum. What made riders go before then?I also would like to know the significance of power to chaining. I've always liked bigger rings as it puts less tension on the chain.
#1555
Senior Member
I use 42cm marked bars which measure 41.x cm, something like 41.2 cm or so. I bought another same brand/model 40 cm, it measures virtually the same. Previously I had 43 cm bars outside to outside that measured about 41 cm c-c.
My shoulder width says to use 42s or even a 43. I've ridden 44s when I was doing long miles thinking I was a road racer (hahahaha…). I can't find it but there's a picture of me in here somewhere in a sprint in 2008 or 2009 and the comments went along the lines of "why do you have such a narrow bar?".
My shoulder width says to use 42s or even a 43. I've ridden 44s when I was doing long miles thinking I was a road racer (hahahaha…). I can't find it but there's a picture of me in here somewhere in a sprint in 2008 or 2009 and the comments went along the lines of "why do you have such a narrow bar?".
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
#1556
OMC
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 6,960
Bikes: Specialized Allez Sprint, Look 585, Specialized Allez Comp Race
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 461 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
49 Posts
I could never figure out why people are so concerned with minimizing chain wear. They cost about the same as a tire and last about the same number of miles. Monitor the wear and replace as necessary. Maybe my eWang is insufficient?
#1557
Senior Member
However I don't think it's about wear. It's about (probably) the perceived extra friction. In a pinch it may not matter, like I found myself in the big-big Sunday by accident (group ride, not a race, and I was already dropped). I quickly changed to a similar gear using the small ring.
It's also about risk. Someone on that ride lost their derailleur when it went into the spokes. Big-big means your derailleur is under all sorts of tension - derailleur maxed out to the inside against the in-out sprint, cage pulled taut maxing out the pulley cage spring, and derailleur pulling chain hard from the outside. You lose all your margins of error - slightly loose dropout, slight misadjustment, slight spoke looseness, etc. The small-middle equivalent offers much less risk. If you back pedal in the small-middle probably nothing will happen. In the big-big you'll realistically derail your chain.
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
#1558
OMC
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 6,960
Bikes: Specialized Allez Sprint, Look 585, Specialized Allez Comp Race
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 461 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
49 Posts
I understand that big-big isn't something to use on a regular basis. I once tore up my DA rear dérailleur when my bike fell over to the right and I didn't check the hanger, then shifted the RD into the spokes. I see more chance for problems shifting to the small ring under pressure in a race than going to big-big...but then I'm pretty careful to check that hangar since that disaster. On a long hill, I'll shift to the small ring early on.
#1559
Senior Member
I wrote a while back about going to narrower bars. They came in last Friday and I installed them, tried them out on a fast ride Saturday. They were remarkably easy to get used to. I went from 44cm to 40cm. I used the measurements from the tip of the saddle to the hoods to set the hoods' positions...now the drops feel too close. Probably just the difference in design between the two bars. Overall, I like the change.
But it gets better. I tried the 42s on the cross bike, and they feel ridiculously wide. Like driving a tractor. I am absolutely not a fan. So I picked up a 42 cm set of Deda bars (measured outside-to-outside, so equivalent to normal 40s) to swap in instead. That should be the butter zone.
What's crazy is when I first got into riding bikes and even early in my racing days, I bought into "wider is better" mantra of Rivendell et al, and the idea that narrower bars made it harder to breathe or something. I had 42 cm bars on my road bike, and 44 cm bars on a touring bike. They were just hideously uncomfortable. Huge mistake.
#1560
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,569
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 678 Times
in
429 Posts
I tried a compact for a year. I could never get comfortable on it. So I went back to standard. 53/39 seems fine for most of the riding I do. The only time I really struggle is when the grade gets up to the mid- to high-teens. once I cross 15 percent, it's a struggle to keep moving. at 20 percent, I am inching up the hill.
Last year, I bought a long cage RD on and an 11-32 cassette for when I take occasional trips to the mountains. It gives me the same gearing as a 34-27. I also could steal the compact off my wife' bike if needed.
Last year, I bought a long cage RD on and an 11-32 cassette for when I take occasional trips to the mountains. It gives me the same gearing as a 34-27. I also could steal the compact off my wife' bike if needed.
#1561
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
I mentioned chain tension. I prefer a 52TX14T over a 45TX12T (same gear) as I believe less energy is lost in the chain/frame system. A tighter chain has more friction (and more compression on the chain stay - another thing). There is more force on the link parts. A chain run at an angle adds force between the plates, also adding friction. The wear is a byproduct of the lost watts.
Smaller rings and smaller cogs bend each link more - very little, but more. Bigger rings bend more links less. I pretend lube is between all plates and rollers and there is no static friction to overcome from starting to bend at the link. The less tension on the chain, the more likely there is lube between rollers and links.
#1562
Senior Member
There was a story about how Shimano had to increase durability of chains when they first came out with the hardened pin chains (for index shifting). Some pros like Phil Anderson were going through a chain in two weeks or less.
However I don't think it's about wear. It's about (probably) the perceived extra friction. In a pinch it may not matter, like I found myself in the big-big Sunday by accident (group ride, not a race, and I was already dropped). I quickly changed to a similar gear using the small ring.
It's also about risk. Someone on that ride lost their derailleur when it went into the spokes. Big-big means your derailleur is under all sorts of tension - derailleur maxed out to the inside against the in-out sprint, cage pulled taut maxing out the pulley cage spring, and derailleur pulling chain hard from the outside. You lose all your margins of error - slightly loose dropout, slight misadjustment, slight spoke looseness, etc. The small-middle equivalent offers much less risk. If you back pedal in the small-middle probably nothing will happen. In the big-big you'll realistically derail your chain.
However I don't think it's about wear. It's about (probably) the perceived extra friction. In a pinch it may not matter, like I found myself in the big-big Sunday by accident (group ride, not a race, and I was already dropped). I quickly changed to a similar gear using the small ring.
It's also about risk. Someone on that ride lost their derailleur when it went into the spokes. Big-big means your derailleur is under all sorts of tension - derailleur maxed out to the inside against the in-out sprint, cage pulled taut maxing out the pulley cage spring, and derailleur pulling chain hard from the outside. You lose all your margins of error - slightly loose dropout, slight misadjustment, slight spoke looseness, etc. The small-middle equivalent offers much less risk. If you back pedal in the small-middle probably nothing will happen. In the big-big you'll realistically derail your chain.
#1563
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 65
Bikes: Batavus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Correct me if I'm wrong here; but if you are saying that friction = power lost, doesn't that mean that 45x12 is better than 52x14, because the chain makes contact with fewer teeth. Fewer contact points = less friction = less power losses?
#1564
Ninny
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Gunks
Posts: 5,295
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
It's not the contact points, it's how much the chain has to distort. At the extremes, a chain running in a circle would have minimal friction, and a chain running between two small cogs would have lots of friction. Given the same chainline, larger chainring/cog = less friction.
#1565
Senior Member
That's not how it works. It's been found repeatedly over the years that larger sprocket combinations yield slightly less resistance. It's not a lot - maybe a watt or two, best case - but there is a difference. From what I understand, it is because of the slightly reduced radius of the bend each link has to make as the chain wraps around the chainring in particular. This is also the reason that there have been some companies selling extra large aftermarket cages and jockey wheels for rear derailleurs, but the benefits are much more questionable for the part of the chain that is not under high tension.
#1566
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
Experience shows smaller gears and rings wear faster.
But the friction I'm concerned about is in the chain. That between the rollers and pins and between the plates. I want less tension and a straight shot from rear cog to front ring whenever I can get it.
How much does this all matter? Hard to tell but chain optimization through different lubes seems to save 4-5W in testing. I guess its in that realm.
#1567
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
I mentioned the bars earlier and put a tape on them. Hood saddle 38cm c-c, plugs 44cm c-c. It flairs the brake levers out a bit. I moved the hoods about 1cm higher than this picture and they are flaired out even more, but that has not presented any problems. The flat tops make forearm resting much nicer. The round neck where the stem grabs is narrow, so putting a Garmin mount around the round part of the bar required a modified (plastic) mount clamp. For normal riding we use the provided stem Garmin mount and that also holds on the Di2 junction box.
#1568
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 65
Bikes: Batavus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ah, ok. Thanks! That makes sense, I guess that's why Tony Martin does his TT on those huge huge chainrings.
#1569
Senior Member
#1570
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
Some TT setups are pretty cool. One kid his kid with only 4-5 cogs in the middle. In the past I just ground my last two see post #1518. Current setup will allow me to put a 15 anywhere. In this case I will not use spacers as those don't add enough friction to keep cogs from stripping off at the hub under high torque. So we will look into running 14-16-17-15-18-19... 10 speeds with 11 speed spacing. Problem is we really want the 14T in the middle so were talking about going to a 56T front and grinding the teeth off a 13T and putting it in 1st position.
EDIT: Found this for a 14T middle https://www.ebay.com/itm/201345102045
So "Big Gear" ends up anyplace we want.
EDIT: Found this for a 14T middle https://www.ebay.com/itm/201345102045
So "Big Gear" ends up anyplace we want.
Last edited by Doge; 05-19-15 at 12:37 PM.
#1571
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 3,888
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Some of this stuff seems waaaaay more involved than I'd ever want to be with the tech side of things, but then again, my goals are much more modest (like, remember to bring the deeper wheel to a TT).
What kind of improvements/marginal gains do you think are you getting from these tweaks? Are the gains theoretical or have you actually seen directly measurable improvements?
What kind of improvements/marginal gains do you think are you getting from these tweaks? Are the gains theoretical or have you actually seen directly measurable improvements?
#1572
Senior Member
Good point. In fact I never shift into the small ring in my races to avoid even the chance of dropping a chain. Hills don't matter because I don't do ones big enough to require a small ring.
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
#1574
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
I think any one thing may not be measurable. Some do nothing. All introduce risk and stuff that when not tested - may blow up. Some is calculated risk - like the silk tires I had made by Fraincois (FMB) with no sidewall coating and record tread to save 30g/wheel. I knew they wouldn't last after one rain - and it rained their first use. Anyways, it is fun and we both enjoy it.
Results of it all? Guesses. The optimized chain was tested reported 5W savings. Other stuff is obvious, other are guesses. TT helmet choice is again a guess.
My guess is 1 step on the podium - 2-3 sec per half hour. Had Peter Sagan had these tweaks in this year's ToC I think he would have held yellow.
Last year Daniel got 1st in the 15-16 TT at VOS (all the best were there) by 1.6 sec. I do not think he would have been on the top step.
Daniel rides a 13#and grams Di2 Venge in race dress.
He will typically beat a kid in the TT/climb that has similar or more power.
(Brandon has way more power and it doesn't work against him.)
As I said - it is fun, but I am seeing more of this stuff done at the International / World class level now.
Results of it all? Guesses. The optimized chain was tested reported 5W savings. Other stuff is obvious, other are guesses. TT helmet choice is again a guess.
My guess is 1 step on the podium - 2-3 sec per half hour. Had Peter Sagan had these tweaks in this year's ToC I think he would have held yellow.
Last year Daniel got 1st in the 15-16 TT at VOS (all the best were there) by 1.6 sec. I do not think he would have been on the top step.
Daniel rides a 13#and grams Di2 Venge in race dress.
He will typically beat a kid in the TT/climb that has similar or more power.
(Brandon has way more power and it doesn't work against him.)
As I said - it is fun, but I am seeing more of this stuff done at the International / World class level now.