Search
Notices
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

Racer Tech Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-16, 11:08 PM
  #4326  
commu*ist spy
 
spectastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: oregon
Posts: 4,459
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
anyone have experience with san remo speed suit? it's like their aero jersey and aero bibs sown together, that's supposed to replicate the drag advantage of the speed suits, with the convenience and comfort of jerseys/bibs.

I like what it promises in performance and comfort. I don't like how you rip the jersey, and the whole thing is ruined. they also offer the same jersey and bibs, not sown together. I will hazard a guess that the performance between the jersey/bibs and san remo are pretty much identical, in which case I'll go for the former. what do you think?
spectastic is offline  
Old 12-03-16, 11:41 PM
  #4327  
Senior Member
 
hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 3,888
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Have one. Not a huge fan and prefer the bib jersey combo instead. Teammates love it and prefer it over bib jersey combo.

It is comfortable for crits, but I don't like how it feels as a single piece when I have things in pockets in road races or training rides.
hack is offline  
Old 12-04-16, 09:49 AM
  #4328  
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Ygduf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978

Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
I went 50-50 san remo and jersey/bibs for next year. san remo is awesome. beware it's sized up vs the race bibs/jersey
Ygduf is offline  
Old 12-04-16, 10:14 AM
  #4329  
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
Originally Posted by spectastic
anyone have experience with san remo speed suit? it's like their aero jersey and aero bibs sown together, that's supposed to replicate the drag advantage of the speed suits, with the convenience and comfort of jerseys/bibs.

I like what it promises in performance and comfort. I don't like how you rip the jersey, and the whole thing is ruined. they also offer the same jersey and bibs, not sown together. I will hazard a guess that the performance between the jersey/bibs and san remo are pretty much identical, in which case I'll go for the former. what do you think?
Son 140#ish wears a small and loves it. I think they have a couple.
He'll still take a skin suit for a crit/TT of course. Otherwise always the San Remo for racing.

Translation...if the juniors have not ripped them - they are well made. Outside of a crash they hold up well and we do the normal washing machine on them. They are sized a wee bit differently.

The other thing to think about is if you wear a special jersey (stage races, fondos) bibs work out better for obvious reasons.
Pack for that.

Last edited by Doge; 12-04-16 at 10:21 AM.
Doge is offline  
Old 12-05-16, 02:11 AM
  #4330  
commu*ist spy
 
spectastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: oregon
Posts: 4,459
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
i was reading a very in depth article about tire widths for different rim widths. for the most part, it argued that wider rims are better for aerodynamics and handling.

I want to ask about 15c aluminum rims though, because that's what I have. how do you compare 23 vs 25 in ride quality, handling, and rolling resistance?
spectastic is offline  
Old 12-05-16, 05:49 AM
  #4331  
OMC
 
revchuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 6,960

Bikes: Specialized Allez Sprint, Look 585, Specialized Allez Comp Race

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 461 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times in 49 Posts
IME, ride quality is better, handling is slightly worse. No idea about rolling resistance. This is based on "old school" wheels, 32 spoke Open Pro and RR465 rims on Ultegra hubs laced 3X. Note that some tires are bigger than others - nominally 25c Michelins ran 27mm+ on these rims, while Contis tended to be about 25mm wide.

The OPs are gone due to an unfortunate car/bike interface. The RR465s are on my TT bike as training wheels, and the rear (with a Powertap hub) stays on for races with a disc wheel cover.
__________________
Regards,
Chuck

Demain, on roule!
revchuck is offline  
Old 12-05-16, 09:32 AM
  #4332  
Senior Member
 
furiousferret's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redlands, CA
Posts: 6,313
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 842 Post(s)
Liked 469 Times in 250 Posts
Originally Posted by spectastic
anyone have experience with san remo speed suit? it's like their aero jersey and aero bibs sown together, that's supposed to replicate the drag advantage of the speed suits, with the convenience and comfort of jerseys/bibs.

I like what it promises in performance and comfort. I don't like how you rip the jersey, and the whole thing is ruined. they also offer the same jersey and bibs, not sown together. I will hazard a guess that the performance between the jersey/bibs and san remo are pretty much identical, in which case I'll go for the former. what do you think?
Love the San Remo's. Comfortable, feels faster, and less of a hassle (1 item in the laundry, easier bathroom breaks, etc). IMO, I think all team kits should be a San Remo style; the design just makes so much more sense.
furiousferret is offline  
Old 12-05-16, 09:59 AM
  #4333  
commu*ist spy
 
spectastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: oregon
Posts: 4,459
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by furiousferret
Love the San Remo's. Comfortable, feels faster, and less of a hassle (1 item in the laundry, easier bathroom breaks, etc). IMO, I think all team kits should be a San Remo style; the design just makes so much more sense.
I tried one on, and the bibs are really tight on the medium, and still kind of tight on the large. so I'm probably getting a m jersey with xl bibs. i can see the attraction though, much less wrinkles, even the large kit, compared to the jersey.
spectastic is offline  
Old 12-05-16, 11:41 AM
  #4334  
Senior Member
 
furiousferret's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redlands, CA
Posts: 6,313
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 842 Post(s)
Liked 469 Times in 250 Posts
I'd go with the large because of shrinkage, if its too snug you'll get tears at the pockets.
furiousferret is offline  
Old 12-05-16, 12:13 PM
  #4335  
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 15,402
Mentioned: 151 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1099 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by spectastic
anyone have experience with san remo speed suit? it's like their aero jersey and aero bibs sown together, that's supposed to replicate the drag advantage of the speed suits, with the convenience and comfort of jerseys/bibs.

I like what it promises in performance and comfort. I don't like how you rip the jersey, and the whole thing is ruined. they also offer the same jersey and bibs, not sown together. I will hazard a guess that the performance between the jersey/bibs and san remo are pretty much identical, in which case I'll go for the former. what do you think?
Our kit sponsor for next year (HyperThreads) makes their skin suits like this, fwiw.

It seems less aero, more bulky, but I only tried one on for about 30 seconds, haven't ridden in it yet.
__________________
cat 1.

my race videos
mattm is offline  
Old 12-05-16, 04:11 PM
  #4336  
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Ygduf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978

Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by furiousferret
Love the San Remo's. Comfortable, feels faster, and less of a hassle (1 item in the laundry, easier bathroom breaks, etc). IMO, I think all team kits should be a San Remo style; the design just makes so much more sense.
downside is crashing and losing both top and bottom for sure.
Ygduf is offline  
Old 12-08-16, 07:45 AM
  #4337  
Senior Member
 
topflightpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,569
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 678 Times in 429 Posts
I'm thinking of learning how to build wheels. I have a buddy who can teach me. Right now, I'm thinking of trying some generic carbon clincher rims laced to DT350 hubs. The 350s are a lot cheaper than 240s, and not that much more expensive. Anyone have much experience with them? I have no interest in something like BHS hubs.
topflightpro is offline  
Old 12-09-16, 01:32 AM
  #4338  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ygduf
downside is crashing and losing both top and bottom for sure.
+1

i happen to love the sanremo, but i've lost a few due to crashes.
tetonrider is offline  
Old 12-09-16, 11:11 AM
  #4339  
commu*ist spy
 
spectastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: oregon
Posts: 4,459
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by revchuck
IME, ride quality is better, handling is slightly worse. No idea about rolling resistance. This is based on "old school" wheels, 32 spoke Open Pro and RR465 rims on Ultegra hubs laced 3X. Note that some tires are bigger than others - nominally 25c Michelins ran 27mm+ on these rims, while Contis tended to be about 25mm wide.

The OPs are gone due to an unfortunate car/bike interface. The RR465s are on my TT bike as training wheels, and the rear (with a Powertap hub) stays on for races with a disc wheel cover.
i see. when you say handling slightly worse, do you mean the tire's more squishy when you're steering, or the corner doesn't feel as smooth?
spectastic is offline  
Old 12-09-16, 11:49 AM
  #4340  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Originally Posted by furiousferret
Love the San Remo's. Comfortable, feels faster, and less of a hassle (1 item in the laundry, easier bathroom breaks, etc). IMO, I think all team kits should be a San Remo style; the design just makes so much more sense.
They also make surprisingly good baselayers for cool but not cold weather. Just put on kneewarmers and throw a longsleeve jersey on for 50's weather.
caloso is offline  
Old 12-09-16, 12:41 PM
  #4341  
OMC
 
revchuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 6,960

Bikes: Specialized Allez Sprint, Look 585, Specialized Allez Comp Race

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 461 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times in 49 Posts
Originally Posted by spectastic
i see. when you say handling slightly worse, do you mean the tire's more squishy when you're steering, or the corner doesn't feel as smooth?
They didn't feel as solid in corners as what I'm using now. That may be due as much to the difference in wheels - the wheels I'm using now are Boyd 44mm carbon clinchers that measure 23mm on the outside and probably 17mm on the inside with 700x25 Turbo Pros (26mm wide on those wheels) and Ardennes+ that measure 25mm on the outside and (IIRC) 21mm on the inside with 700x24 S-Works Turbos (27mm wide on those wheels).
__________________
Regards,
Chuck

Demain, on roule!
revchuck is offline  
Old 12-09-16, 12:44 PM
  #4342  
commu*ist spy
 
spectastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: oregon
Posts: 4,459
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by revchuck
They didn't feel as solid in corners as what I'm using now. That may be due as much to the difference in wheels - the wheels I'm using now are Boyd 44mm carbon clinchers that measure 23mm on the outside and probably 17mm on the inside with 700x25 Turbo Pros (26mm wide on those wheels) and Ardennes+ that measure 25mm on the outside and (IIRC) 21mm on the inside with 700x24 S-Works Turbos (27mm wide on those wheels).
oh, well yea. the wider rims will provide better support on the corners. I was asking more about how the handling differs between a 23 and 25 on an aluminum rim with 15 mm inner width. I doubt it really matters.
spectastic is offline  
Old 12-09-16, 12:59 PM
  #4343  
Senior Member
 
hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 3,888
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by spectastic
oh, well yea. the wider rims will provide better support on the corners. I was asking more about how the handling differs between a 23 and 25 on an aluminum rim with 15 mm inner width. I doubt it really matters.
I didn't like wider tires on narrow rims. Felt like the tire was going to fold over when making hard turns. Much more comfortable on a 25mm tire and 25mm outer wheel.
hack is offline  
Old 12-09-16, 01:16 PM
  #4344  
commu*ist spy
 
spectastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: oregon
Posts: 4,459
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by hack
I didn't like wider tires on narrow rims. Felt like the tire was going to fold over when making hard turns. Much more comfortable on a 25mm tire and 25mm outer wheel.
do you run low pressure for crits?
spectastic is offline  
Old 12-09-16, 01:34 PM
  #4345  
Senior Member
 
hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 3,888
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by spectastic
do you run low pressure for crits?
Not really. I don't use the narrow wheels with 25s anymore though. My older Reynolds strike wheels are setup with 23's and 100-105 psi. I don't use those too often. 90% or more of my time is spent on a 50mm deep 25mm wide wheel with 25 tires. Run those around 95 psi and they feel great.
hack is offline  
Old 12-09-16, 01:51 PM
  #4346  
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
Originally Posted by hack
I didn't like wider tires on narrow rims. Felt like the tire was going to fold over when making hard turns. Much more comfortable on a 25mm tire and 25mm outer wheel.
Same as junior runs ~140#. Crits about 95/100 RR - depends on road, about the same. Smooth road and planning a sprint a bit higher. TT - near 120.
Doge is offline  
Old 12-09-16, 06:03 PM
  #4347  
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
I had to look before putting back in the box for a Christmas present.

I imagine they will cost 17sec in a 40K TT - but they are for going up hill. Actually they are really just cause my son likes them.

These are likely better on a wall or display. They are so beautiful - and very light. The brake pads are the most noticeable weight.
KCNCSmall.jpg
Doge is offline  
Old 12-09-16, 06:32 PM
  #4348  
commu*ist spy
 
spectastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: oregon
Posts: 4,459
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
so spoiled.
spectastic is offline  
Old 12-09-16, 07:07 PM
  #4349  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Doge
I had to look before putting back in the box for a Christmas present.

I imagine they will cost 17sec in a 40K TT - but they are for going up hill. Actually they are really just cause my son likes them.

These are likely better on a wall or display. They are so beautiful - and very light. The brake pads are the most noticeable weight.
Attachment 545424
what's the weight difference between those & eebrakes?

fwiw i found the eebrakes to be the one lightweight brake that still performed really well relative to DA brakes (~90%). all the other lightweight brakes IME were unacceptable -- some scary, even -- and not materially lighter than the eebrakes.

ymmv.
tetonrider is offline  
Old 12-09-16, 07:38 PM
  #4350  
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
Originally Posted by tetonrider
what's the weight difference between those & eebrakes?

fwiw i found the eebrakes to be the one lightweight brake that still performed really well relative to DA brakes (~90%). all the other lightweight brakes IME were unacceptable -- some scary, even -- and not materially lighter than the eebrakes.

ymmv.
Don't know. I think these are reported to be 175g. Daniel has used KCNC post, skewers, chainring, some starting age 11 and likes the weirdness of the stuff...and it is machined.

The real function is secondary as long as it is safe. This is mainly an uphill bike although he may do a crit and a few group rides.
Doge is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.