View Single Post
Old 11-07-06, 11:43 PM
  #6  
NoReg
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,115
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
All Phil 36-h f/w hubs are "asymmetrical flange" design (i.e., equal spoke length with standard rim)

I have heard that some 145 tandem/touring hubs are dishless. It may be that the 165 hub is both dishless and has the better rigging angles. The rigging angles I read, aren't necesarilly all that great on the 145s, but at least they are the same. And if you look at the thread I have on diferential spokes, you can read the argument that says that equalising the strain may well be the more important issue than getting better angles.
NoReg is offline