Originally Posted by Helmet Head
Nice glimpse into our future if you facilities fanatics have your way.
The lawyer had to point out to the judge that the cyclist had no legal obligation to be on the path.
Many people, probably including the judge, would consider that an oversight in the law.
This is where "more and more facilities" thinking is taking us, folks.
The next step is to fix the "oversight" in the law.
Wow, I completely agree with HH for once. Cool!