Old 02-26-07, 01:10 PM
  #7  
TO11MTM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wroomwroomoops
So, I realized I like frames which are 54 or even 56, except for the standover height - because I'm only 171cm tall, and have relatively short legs, too.

Also, I like to have the seat relatively high for my height, too.

So, am I condemned to use women's frames ?
As the other poster said, you'd probably be WORSE off on a women's frame. They will typically have a shorter reach versus Standover...

I don't know if Diamondback exists in the same sense that they do in the states over in Europe (I'm not sure...) But they have an UNGODLY compact geometry. We're talking a 50cm seat tube (Center to top) to a 56CM Effective Top Tube.

For reference, a Specialized Allez has a geometry closer to a 52cm Seat tube (Center to top) to a 56cm effective top tube.

If they don't exist over there check if another company has a similar geometry setup. They can't be the only company that have a setup like that.

Worst comes to worst I can smuggle one over, just pay for the frame, plane ticket, and my beer at Tavastia.
TO11MTM is offline