Originally Posted by sggoodri
I don't really care for your "Advanced" modifier as I don't see what borders on pathological lane dominance as a virtue or desirable progression from normal vehicular cycling.
I suggest we call it something more descriptive and clear, such as "Lane Dominance Cycling". The basic rules of the road, and why it's useful to follow them on a bike, would be outside the scope of a discussion about how to most effectively control a travel lane.
I agree that "what borders on pathological lane dominance" is not a "virtue or desirable progression from normal vehicular cycling". That's why I think the definition should be refined so that it does not border on pathological lane dominance. Does my proposed compromise version above seem that way to you?