Originally Posted by Helmet Head

I can't even begin to tell you why this cracks me up so much. Maybe I will in a PM.

I think it's helpful to differentiate between "basic" and "advanced" VC. The other definitions tend to mix them all up. More importantly, when people write about VC, sometimes them mean basic VC, sometimes they mean basic+advance, sometimes they mean just advanced. If we achieve acceptance for these clarified terms, perhaps they will be adopted in wider circles.

Besides that, the term "strict VC", has been bandied about here lately, and I think it's useful to use it to differentiate between real and imagined VC advocates.