Originally Posted by John Forester
Hurst is telling us that the assumption (one can't call it a theory) behind bike lanes, and embodied in the design standards, is so faulty that nobody can tell whether the product will be good or bad. That is the measure of the disdain in which our society holds cyclists ...
Okay, but what Hurst is really saying is it's an insignificant issue. He is saying that if everybody who is so embroiled with this great Question suddenly quit for good, at this point it wouldn't make much difference.
The unbearable lightness of being. Specifically, the unbearable lightness of being a bike lane pundit.
Robert