Old 04-28-07, 09:46 AM
  #48  
John Forester
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,071
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bekologist
at risk of inflaming ol' mossy john,

it sounds like even the most vehemently dogmatic VC can advocate for bike lanes. 'design for vehicular cyling on roads' well, vehicular cyclists can and do use bike lanes, daily, all over the country. thousands of us. tens of thousands of vehicular cyclists use bike lanes daily. safely, competantly, in accordance with vehicular rules of the road.

mossy john states in another thread, that vehicular cyclists CAN ride in a bike lane, and vehicular cyclists should advocate for vehicular cycling, so logically, some advocating for bike lanes is within the aegis of vehicular cyclists' aganda.

interesting.
More semantic tricks that demonstrate only that Bekologist has no reasonable agenda that he can advance by reasonable means. There's nothing there.
John Forester is offline