View Single Post
Old 06-01-07, 10:42 AM
  #3  
skanking biker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head

Few cyclists know about this, not to mention non-cyclists who are probably almost all unaware of it, much less understand the implications. This rule is at the heart of vehicular cycling.

The basic idea is that any time a lane is too narrow to be safely shared side-by-side, there is no legal obligation for the cyclist to keep to the side. Although the laws use the word "substandard", a typical lane is about 12 feet wide, and is arguably too narrow to safely share with most cars. So, arguably, this rule only applies in WOLs.
I have no problem agreeing with this and this happens to be how I ride anyway under most circumstances. Where I disagree with some VC advocates is that I do not think "taking the lane" is always ipso facto safe. This is why I do not oppose bikelanes being installed on highspeed, high volume roads.
skanking biker is offline