Old 08-07-07, 07:24 PM
  #11  
Wogster
Senior Member
 
Wogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,931

Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by ang1sgt
Unless it is a High End Suspension fork and you need it for off-road work, I tell folks to stay with the rigid fork to be sure. If you need added comfort, by all means look for a carbon front fork as a replacement.

At 255 lbs My STEEL frame MTB with the CARBON front fork works very well for me. Very positive handling and not too jarring a ride at all.

Brooks B-17 rider here!
Do they make a rigid carbon fork, that is a drop in replacement for a suspension fork? If so, made by whom, and what model(s). I would like to dump the 80mm suspension fork on my bike, and since, these days, I am so close to the Clyde limit, ( 97kg at last check), I would consider CF, providing it's inexpensive enough (side benefit, I could get the bars up a little).
Wogster is offline