Originally Posted by
skanking biker
its not as simple as that. I was suprised to learn that the different labsa ll have different criteria for what constitutes a "positive" test. At his hearing scientists from a number of labs--including the labs in the USA testified that had they tested the sample, it would not have met the criteria for a positive.
hmmm. interesting point. so who ultimately sets the standards for what constitues a positive test, WADA? the UCI....the whole thing is confusing to me.....concerning a time limit, it does seem like a more reasonable amount of time to handle these matters needs to be in place. anyway.......*head spinning*