View Single Post
Old 10-18-07, 01:50 PM
  #10  
solveg
Squirrel
 
solveg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Winfield, KS
Posts: 4,940

Bikes: Borthwick Touring bike, 83 Schwinn Peloton, 94 Scott Cheyenne, ?? Bianchi Torino

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Servo888
My stand-over height is right at my crotch right now; but my bikes length is perfect. There are plenty of frames out there these days that don't compromise, so that's something to look into. Also stand-over height at your crotch is dangerous - don't come after me if anything happens to your family jewels.
My situation, too. I like vintage bikes, so I always buy the bikes as big as I can straddle because my torso and arms are so long. My legs would like a 53 cm bike, but my back wants a 59 cm. I think my next bike will be a custom build, but I've never tried a bike with compact geometry.

Could someone explain exactly* what compact geometry is? Because I've avoided it because "compact" didn't sound like something someone who needed more torso space would want....
__________________
solveg is offline