View Single Post
Old 02-27-08, 01:05 PM
  #11  
Rob_E
Senior Member
 
Rob_E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,709

Bikes: Downtube 8H, Surly Troll

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 303 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
Think of the state & federal fuel taxes you AREN'T paying, when you ride your bike.
I'd rather not pay a tax in the first place instead of having the gov. give me back part of it.
Where would these rebates come from? Taxpayers!
Amen. Whatever refunds they might offer, would, I assume, be to encourage using less gas and thus easing demand, decreasing wear and tear on the roads, contributing less to pollution, etc. If all these problems are caused by gas-driven vehicles, pay for them out of taxes levied against gasoline. You haven't just encouraged commuting to work. You've encouraged alternative transportation and mass transit for all purposes.

Encouraging favourable behavior is good, but if you want to effect change, I would think that providing disincentives for the undesirable behaviors would be better.
Rob_E is offline