View Single Post
Old 03-01-08, 01:30 PM
  #4  
maddmaxx 
Boomer
 
maddmaxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,214

Bikes: Diamondback Clarity II frame homebuilt.

Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16098 Post(s)
Liked 1,457 Times in 1,064 Posts
If you feel like the bars should be brought back an inch and a quarter, thats almost 3 cm. If the bike was outfitted with a 120mm stem and everything else is sized perfectly then a change to a 90 stem would not be completely unreasonable. If however, the saddle position is so good that moving it a bit forward would be a bad change then the 56 mike may be too large for you. A 54 would be shorter by 2 of the centemeters that you are asking for. (The top tube length will end up being a more important fit parameter for you than the length of the seat tube).

IMHO you may want to try a 54 after all. 56 is a pretty big bike for a 50+ rider who may want to be a little more vertical. Just for example, I am almost 6' tall (with short legs) and I have come to find that I am much more comfortable on a 54 or 55 than my old 57.

I would recomend a frame that starts you out with a 110 stem so that you have a little wiggle room for later changes.
__________________
maddmaxx is offline